Direct cuspal-coverage posterior resin composite restorations: A case report

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 143-150

  Deliperi, Simone ^a,b   Bardwell, David N ^a,b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Department of Restorative Dentistry ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644773448     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/04-177     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs (1998) Statement on posterior resin based composite. ADA Council on Dental Benefit Program Journal of the American Dental Association 129(11) 1627-1628.
2. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM & Gingell JC (1991) A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin Quintessence International 22(2) 143-151.
3. Christensen GJ (1998) Amalgam vs composite resin Journal of the American Dental Association 129(12) 1757-1759.
4. Deliperi S & Bardwell DN (2002) An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations Journal of the American Dental Association 133(12) 1387-1398.
5. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN & Congin MD (2003a) Reconstruction of severely damaged endodontically treated and bleached teeth using a microhybrid composite resin: Two-year case report Practical Procedure & Aesthetic Dentistry 15(3) 221-226.
6. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN & Papathanasiou A (2003b) Effect of different polymerization methods on composite microleakage American Journal of Dentistry 16(Spec No) 73A-76A.
7. Deliperi S & Bardwell D (2004) Clinical evaluation of a microhybrid composite to reconstruct endo-bleached teeth Journal of Dental Research 83(Special Issue A) Abstract #1376.
8. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN & Congin MD (2004) Reconstruction of devital teeth using direct fiber-reinforced composite resins: A case report Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 7(2) 165-171.
9. Dietschi D (2001) Layering concepts in anterior composite restorations Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(1) 71-80.
10. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ & Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration Journal of Dental Research 66(11) 1636-1639.
11. Ferracane JL & Condon JR (1992) Post-cure heat treatments for composites: Properties and fractography Dental Materials 8(5) 290-295.
12. Ferreira Rde S, Lopes GC & Baratieri LN (2004) Direct posterior resin composite restorations: Considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures Quintessence International 35(5) 359-366.
13. Han L, Okamoto A & Iwaku M (1992) The effect of various clinical factors on marginal enamel micro-cracks produced around composite restoration Dental Materials 11(1) 26-37.
14. Hickel R, Manhart J & García-Godoy F (2000) Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations American Journal of Dentistry 13(Spec No) 41D-54D.
15. Hickel R & Manhart J (2001) Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(1) 45-64.
16. Hoelscher DC, Neme AM, Pink FE & Hughes PJ (1998) The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials Operative Dentistry 23(1) 36-42.
17. Hondrum SO & Fenández R Jr (1997) Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class V restorative materials Operative Dentistry 22(1) 30-36.
18. rd & Suh BI (1999) Pulse activation: Reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins American Journal of Dentistry 12(3) 107-112.
19. Kramer N & Frankenberger R (2000) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: Wear of luting composites Operative Dentistry 25(6) 466-472.
20. Krejci I, Guntert A & Lutz F (1994) Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ Quintessence International 25(6) 403-409.
21. Krejci I, Due O, Dietschi D & de Campos E (2003) Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts Operative Dentistry 28(2) 127-135.
22. Kildal KK & Ruyter IE (1997) How different curing methods affect mechanical properties of composites for inlays when tested in dry and wet conditions European Journal of Oral Science 105(4) 353-361.
23. Leinfelder KF & Yarnell G (1995) Occlusion and restorative materials Dental Clinics of North America 39(2) 355-361.
24. Liebenberg WH (2000) Assuring restorative integrity in extensive posterior resin composite restorations: Pushing the envelope Quintessence International 31(3) 153-164.
25. Liebenberg WH (2001) Partial-coverage posterior ceramic restorations. Part 1: A return to diligence Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 13(5) 296-303.
26. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ & Carter JM (2001) A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 85(4) 386-395.
27. McDaniel JR, Davis RD, Murchison DF & Cohen RB (2000) Causes of failure among cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations: A clinical survey Journal of the American Dental Association 131(2) 173-177.
28. Miyazaki M, Oshida Y, Moore BK & Onose H (1996) Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of lightcured composites Dental Materials 12(6) 328-332.
29. Pallesen U & van Dijken JW (2000) An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system European Journal of Oral Science 108(3) 239-246.
30. Pallesen U & Qvist V (2003) Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation Clinical Oral Investigation 7(2) 71-79.
31. Peutzfeldt A & Asmussen E (2000) The effect of post-curing on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites Journal of Dentistry 28(6) 447-452.
32. Plasmans PJ, Creugers NH & Mulder J (1998) Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations Journal of Dental Research 77(3) 453-460.
33. Prati C, Simpson M, Mitchem J, Tao L & Pashley DH (1992) Relationship between bond strength and microleakage measured in the same Class I restorations Dental Materials 8(1) 37-41.
34. Rasmusson CG & Lundin SA (1995) Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five-year results Sweden Dental Journal 19(5) 173-182.
35. Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder KF & Thomas J (1989) Effect of finishing on the in vivo wear rate of a posterior composite resin Journal of the American Dental Association 118(3) 333-335.
36. Roulet JF (1997) Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam Journal of Dentistry 25(6) 459-473.
37. Sakaguchi RL & Berge HX (1998) Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites Journal of Dentistry 26(8) 695-700.
38. Smales RJ & Hawthorne WS (1996) Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations International Dental Journal 46(3) 126-130.
39. Shortall AC & Baylis RL (1991) Microleakage around direct composite inlays Journal of Dentistry 19(5) 307-311.
40. Suh BI (1999) Controlling and understanding the polymerization shrinkage-induced stresses in light cured composites Compendium of Continuous Education in Dentistry 25 s34-s41.
41. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Wilder AD Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR & Bayne SC (2001) Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years Journal of the American Dental Association 132(8) 1117-1123.
42. Swift EJ Jr (2001) Processed composites Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 13(5) 284.
43. Thordrup M, Isidor F & Horsted-Bindslev P (2001) A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays Quintessence International 32(3) 199-205.
44. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1994) Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems Journal of Dental Research 73(11) 1690-1702.
45. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1998) The clinical performance of adhesives Journal of Dentistry 26(1) 1-20.
46. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2001) Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry Operative Dentistry Supplement 6 119-144.
47. van Dijken JW (1994) A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations Acta Odontologica Scandinavian 52(6) 368-376.
48. van Dijken JW (2000) Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: An 11-year follow-up Journal of Dentistry 28(5) 299-306.
49. Wassell RW, Walls AW & McCabe JF (1995) Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: Three-year clinical results British Dental Journal 179(9) 343-349.
50. Wassell RW, Walls AW & McCabe JF (2000) Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up Journal of Dentistry 28(6) 375-382.
51. Wendt SL Jr (1987a) The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability Quintessence International 18(4) 265-271.
52. Wendt SL Jr (1987b) The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness, and color stability Quintessence International 18(5) 351-356.
53. Wendt SL Jr (1991) Microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays American Journal of Dentistry 4(1) 10-14.
54. Wendt SL Jr & Leinfelder KF (1992) Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results American Journal of Dentistry 5(5) 258-262.