Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations?

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 82, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 967-971

  Kuijs, R H ^a   Fennis, W M M ^a   Kreulen, C M ^a   Barink, M ^a   Verdonschot, N ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Composite; Cusp replacement; FE model; Polymerization stress

Indexed keywords

POLYMER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CERVIX; VISCOSITY;

CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYMERS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; VISCOSITY;

EID: 3042794404     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154405910308201206     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Akinmade AO, Nicholson JW (1995). Poisson's ratio of glass polyalkenoate (glassionomer) cements determined by an ultrasonic pulse method. J Mater Science Med 6:483-485.
2. al-Salehi SK, Burke FJ (1997). Methods used in dentin bonding tests: an analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quintessence Int 28:717-723.
3. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL (2002). Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations-a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 18:295-303.
4. Barink M, Van der Mark PC, Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N (2003). A three-dimensional finite element model of the polymerization process in dental restorations. Biomaterials 24:1427-1435.
5. Donly KJ, Jensen ME (1986). Posterior composite polymerization shrinkage in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three techniques. Pediatr Dent 8:209-212.
6. Donly KJ, Jensen ME, Reinhardt J, Walker JD (1987). Posterior composite polymerization shrinkage in primary teeth: an in vivo comparison of three restorative techniques. Pediatr Dent 9:22-25.
7. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1990). Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 6:167-171.
8. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1995). Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 103:322-326.
9. Hübsch PF (1995). A numerical and analytical investigation into some mechanical aspects of adhesive dentistry (PhD thesis). Swansea, UK: Univ. of Wales.
10. Hübsch PF, Middleton J, Knox J (2000). A finite element analysis of the stress at the restoration-tooth interface, comparing inlays and bulk fillings. Biomaterials 21:1015-1019.
11. Kuijs RH, Burgersdijk RC, Roeters FJ (1998). Laagdikte van hechtlakken. Relatie laagdikte en viscositeit. [Layer thickness of dental adhesives. Relation between layer thickness and viscosity]. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 12:434-436.
12. Meredith N, Setchell DJ (1997). In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 25:331-337.
13. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH (1998a). Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26:555-562.
14. Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I (1998b). Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation and microleakage. Am J Dent 11:229-234.
15. Proos KA, Swain MV, Ironside J, Steven GP (2002). Finite element analysis studies of an all-ceramic crown on a first premolar. Int J Prosthodont 15:404-412.
16. Suliman AA, Boyer DB, Lakes RS (1993). Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 9:6-10.
17. Suliman AH, Boyer DB, Lakes RS (1994). Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent 71:7-12.
18. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ (1996). Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 9:100-104.
19. Tjan AHL, Bergh BH, Lidner C (1992). Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 67:62-66.
20. Verdonschot N, Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Stolk J, Kreulen CM, Creugers NHJ (2001). Generation of 3-D finite element models of restored human teeth using micro CT-techniques. Int J Prosthodont 14:310-315.
21. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL (1996). Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 75:871-878.
22. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH (1998). Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 77:1435-1445.
23. Winkler MM, Katona TR, Paydar NH (1996). Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res 75:1477-1483.
24. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J (2001). The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities. J Adhes Dent 3:177-183.