Smith predictor type control architectures for time delayed teleoperation

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 797-818

  Smith, Andrew C ^a   Hashtrudi Zaad, Keyvan ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Communication delay; Neural networks; Predictive control; Smith predictor; Teleoperation

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT CONTROL; NEURAL NETWORKS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; SYSTEM STABILITY;

COMMUNICATION DELAY; PREDICTIVE CONTROL; SMITH PREDICTORS; TELEOPERATION;

TELECONTROL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 33745955839     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: 17413176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364906068393     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson, R. and Spong, M. 1989. Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 34 (5). 494-501.
2. Bejczy, A., Kim, W., and Venema, S. 1990. The phantom robot: predictive displays for teleoperation with time delay. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 1, pp. 546-551, Cincinnati, OH.
3. Casavola, A., Mosca, E., and Sorbara, M. 2004. Teleoperation of constrained dynamical systems over a tcp/ip local network. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 4, pp. 4122-4127, New Orleans, LA.
4. Diolaiti, N., Melchiorri, C., and Stramigioli, S. 2005. Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21 (5). 925-935.
5. Dubey, R., Chan, T., and Everett, S. 1997. Variable damping impedance control of a bilateral telerobotic system. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 17 (1). 37-45.
6. Fite, K., Goldfarb, M., and Rubio, A. 2003. Transparent telemanipulation in the presence of time delay. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, volume 1, pp. 254-259, Kobe, Japan.
7. Ganjefar, S., Momeni, H., and Janabi-Sharifi, F. 2002. Tele-operation systems design using augmented wave-variables and smith predictor method for reducing time-delay effects. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, pp. 333-338, Vancouver, B.C.
8. Ganjefar, S., Momeni, H., Janabi Sharifi, F., and Hamidi Beheshti, M. T. 2003. Behavior of smith predictor in teleoperation systems with modeling and delay time errors. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, volume 2, pp. 1176-1180, Istanbul, Turkey.
9. Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. and Salcudean, S. 1996. Adaptive transparent impedance reflecting teleoperation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pp. 1369-1374, Minneapolis, MN.
10. Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. and Salcudean, S. 2001. Analysis of control architectures for teleoperation systems with impedance/admittance master and slave manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research 20 (6). 419-445.
11. Hashtrudi-Zaad, K., Salcudean, S., and DiMaio, S. 2000. Force feedback teloperation of a mini-excavator over the internet, using a virutal master environment. Video Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 24-25, San Francisco, CA.
12. Haykin, S. 1994. Neural Network: A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillan College Publishing.
13. Heredia, E., Kumar, V., and Rahman, T. 1996. Adaptive teleoperation transparency based on impedance modeling. Proceedings of The International Society for Optical Engineering, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies III, 2901: 2-12.
14. Hirzinger, G., Heindl, J., and Landzettel, K. 1989. Predictive and knowledge-based telerobotic control concepts. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 3, pp. 1768-1777, Scottsdale, AZ.
15. Huang, J.-Q. and Lewis, F. 2003. Neural-network predictive control for nonlinear dynamic systems with time-delay. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 14 (2). 377-389.
16. Kim, W., Hannaford, B., and Bejczy, A. 1992. Force-reflection and shared compliant control in operating telemanipulators with time delay. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 8 (2). 176-185.
17. Lawrence, D. 1993. Stability and transparency in bilateral tele-operation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 9 (5). 624-637.
18. Leung, G., Francis, B., and Apkarian, J. 1995. Bilateral controller for teleoperators with time delay via -synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 11 (1). 105-116.
19. Love, L. and Book, W. 2004. Force reflecting teleoperation with adaptive impedance control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B 34 (1). 159-165.
20. Mehrotra, K., Mohan, C., and Ranka, S. 2000. Elements of Artificial Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21. Munir, S. and Book, W. 2002. Internet-based teleoperation using wave variables with prediction. IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics 7 (2). 124-133.
22. Negnevitsky, M. and Ringrose, M. 1999. Acceletared learning in multi-layer neural networks. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp. 1167-1171.
23. Niemeyer, G. and Slotine, J.-J. 1991. Stable adaptive teleoperation. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 16 (1). 152-162.
24. Niemeyer, G. and Slotine, J.-J. 1998. Towards force-reflecting teleoperation over the internet. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 3, pp. 1909-1915, Lueven, Belgium.
25. Park, J. and Sheridan, T. 1991. Supervisory teleoperation control using computer graphics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 1, pp. 493-498, Sacramento, CA.
26. Penin, L., Matsumoto, K., and Wakabayashi, S. 2000. Force reflection for ground control of space robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 7 (4). 50-63.
27. Ryu, J.-H., Kwon, D.-S., and Hannaford, B. 2004. Stable tele-operation with time-domain passivity control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 20 (2). 365-373.
28. Salcudean, S., Hashtrudi-Zaad, K., Tafazoli, S., DiMaio, S., and Reboulet, C. 1999. Bilateral matched impedance tele-operation with application to excavator control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 19 (6). 29-37.
29. Sheridan, T. 1989. Telerobotics. Automatica 25 (4). 487-507.
30. Sheridan, T. 1993. Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 9 (5). 592-606.
31. Sirouspour, S. and Shahdi, A. 2005. Bilateral teleoperation under communication time delay using an LQG controller. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, pp. 1257-1262, Toronto, ON.
32. Slotine, J.-J. and Li, W. 1989. Composite adaptive control of robot manipulators. Automatica 25 (4). 509-519.
33. Smith, A. 2005. Neural network based predictive control for time-delayed teleoperation. Master's thesis, Queen's University.
34. Smith, A., Mobasser, F., and Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. 2006. Neural network based contact force observers for haptic applications. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. Accepted.
35. Smith, O. 1957. Closer control of loops with dead time. Chemical Engineering Progress 53 (5). 217-219.
36. Stocco, L., Salcudean, S., and Sassani, F. 2001. Optimal kinematic design of a haptic pen. IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics 6 (3). 210-220.
37. Wan, W. 2006. Implementing online natural gradient learning: Problems and solutions. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17 (2). 317-329.
38. Yan, J. and Salcudean, S. 1996. Teleoperation controller design using H∞-optimization with application to motion-scaling. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 4 (3). 244-258.
39. Zhu, W.-H. and Salcudean, S. 2000. Stability guaranteed teleoperation: an adaptive motion/force control approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 45 (11). 1951-1969.