Alkanethiols on platinum: Multicomponent self-assembled monolayers

Langmuir

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 2578-2587

  Petrovykh, Dmitri Y ^a,b   Kimura Suda, Hiromi ^c,d   Opdahl, Aric ^c,e   Richter, Lee J ^c   Tarlov, Michael J ^c   Whitman, Lloyd J ^b  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d PerkinElmer Japan Co Ltd   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKANETHIOLS; DODECANETHIOL; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS (SAM); SPECTROSCOPIC ELLIPSOMETRY (SE);

BINDING ENERGY; CHEMISORPTION; CONTACT ANGLE; DEPOSITION; METALLIC FILMS; PLATINUM; SELF ASSEMBLY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

MONOLAYERS;

EID: 33645514247     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la050928a     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Chen, Y.; Ohlberg, D. A. A.; Li, X. M.; Stewart, D. R.; Williams, R. S.; Jeppesen, J. O.; Nielsen, K. A.; Stoddart, J. P.; Olynick, D. L.; Anderson, E. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 1610-1612.
2. Beebe, J. M.; Engelkes, V. B.; Miller, L. L.; Frisbie, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11268-11269.
3. Graff, K. Metal Impurities in Silicon Device Fabrication; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1995; Vol. 24.
4. Vilar, M. R.; Bouali, Y.; Kitakatsu, N.; Lang, P.; Michalitsch, R.; Garnier, F.; Dubot, P. Thin Solid Films 1998, 329, 236-240.
5. Li, Z. Y.; Chang, S. C.; Williams, R. S. Langmuir 2003, 19, 6744-6749.
6. Brito, R.; Tremont, R.; Feliciano, O.; Cabrera, C. R. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2003, 540, 53-59.
7. Laiho, T.; Leiro, J. A.; Lukkari, J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2003, 212, 525-529.
8. Schienoff, I. B.; Li, M.; Ly, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 117, 12528-12536.
9. Laibinis, P. E.; Whitesides, G. M.; Allara, D. L.; Tao, Y. T.; Parikh, A. N.; Nuzzo, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7152-7167.
10. Rieley, H.; Kendall, G. K.; Zemieael, F. W.; Smith, T. L.; Yang, S. H. Langmuir 1998, 14, 5147-5153.
11. Schoenfisch, M. H.; Pemberton, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4502-4513.
12. Blackstock, J. S.; Li, Z. Y.; Freeman, M. R.; Stewart, D. R. Surf. Sci. 2003, 546, 87-96.
13. Seah, M. P.; Gilmore, L. S.; Beamson, G. Surf. Interface Anal. 1998, 26, 642-649.
14. Powell, C. J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1995, 89, 141-149.
15. Hesse, R.; Chasse, T.; Szargan, R. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1999, 365, 48-54.
16. The total fwhm is the sum of Gaussian and Loremzian contributions. The Lorentzian fwhm was 0.1 eV for C Is and O Is and 0.25 eV for S 2p. For C Is components C2 and C3, the total fwhm was fixed to that of Cl (1.2-1.3 eV). For S 2p components, we used a spin-orbit intensity ratio of 0.5 and an energy splitting of 1.2 eV.; the total fwhm was 0.98 eV for SI and S2, 1.48 eV for S3.
17. Castner, D. G.; Hinds, K.; Grainger, D. W. Langmuir 1996, 12, 5083-5086.
18. Ishida, T.; Hara, M.; Kojima, I.; Tsuneda, S.; Nishida, N.; Sasabe, H.; Knoll, W. Langmuir 1998, 14, 2092-2096.
19. Heister, K.; Frey, S.; Golzhauser, A.; Ulman, A.; Zhamikov, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 11098-11104.
20. Heister, K.; Allara, D. L.; Bahnck, K.; Frey, S.; Zharnikov, M.; Grunze, M. Langmuir 1999, 15, 5440-5443.
21. Yan, C.; Golzhauser, A.; Grunze, M.; Woll, C. Langmuir 1999, 15, 2414-2419.
22. Kawasaki, M.; Sato.T.; Tanaka, T.; Takao, K. Langmuir 2000, 16, 1719-1728.
23. Heister, K.; Zharnikov, M.; Grunze, M.; Johansson, L. S. O. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 4058-4061.
24. Yang, Y. W.; Fan, L. J. Langmuir 2002, 18, 1157-1164.
25. Laibinis, P. E.; Bain, C. D.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 7017-7021.
26. Hansen, H. S.; Tougaard, S.; Biebuyok, H. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1992, 58, 141-158.
27. Himmelhaus, M.; Gauss, I.; Buck, M.; Eisert, F.; Woll, C.; Grunze, M. J. Electron Spectrosc, Relat. Phenom. 1998, 92, 139-149.
28. Ohgi, T.; Fujita, D.; Deng, W.; Dong, Z. C.; Nejoh, H. Surf. Sci. 2001, 493, 453-459.
29. Laibinis, P. E.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9022-9028.
30. Ron, H.; Cohen, H.; Matlis, S.; Rappaport, M.; Rubinstein, I. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 9861-9869.
31. Sung, M. M.; Sung, K.; Kim, C. G.; Lee, S. S.; Kim, Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2273-2277.
32. Mekhalif, Z.; Laffmeur, F.; Couturier, N.; Delhalle, J. Langmuir 2003, 19, 637-645.
33. Love, J. C.; Wolfe, D. B.; Haasch, R.; Chabinyc, M. L.; Paul, K. E.; Whitesides, G. M.; Nuzzo, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2597-2609.
34. Brito, R.; Rodriguez, V. A.; Figueroa, J.; Cabrera, C. R. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 520, 47-52.
35. Long, Y. T.; Herrwerth, S.; Eck, W.; Grunze, M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 522-526.
36. Scofield, J. H. J. Electron Spectrosc, Relat. Phenom. 1976, 8, 129-137.
37. Normalizing elemental XPS signals by the corresponding Scofield factors (ref 36) is a standard way to correct for element-dependent photoelectric cross sections, the major factor that determines element-specific XPS intensities. This normalization ignores any spatial distribution of the elements, but provides a practical way to compare elemental intensities, as such Scofield-adjusted intensity ratios often appear in quantitative XPS analysis models (see Appendix).
38. Vericat, C.; Vela, M. E.; Andreasen, Q.; Salvarezza, R. C.; Vazquez, L.; Martin-Gago, J. A. Langmuir 2001, 17, 4919-4924.
39. Zerulla, D.; Chasse, T. Langmuir 1999, ;5, 5285-5294.
40. The Tougaard model with parameters established for SAMs/Au (ref 26) predicts intensities of inelastic backgrounds to be much lower than the observed high-BE shoulders of S 2p peaks. The asymmetric S 2p peak shapes thus correspond to multiple S 2p components.
41. The spectra were analyzed by nonlinear least-squares fitting to multiple Lorentzian lines, except in the case of the UVO-Pt substrate, in which a Gaussian line shape was required.
42. Parikh, A. N.; Allara, D. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 927-945.
43. Shi, J.; Hong, B.; Parikh, A. N.; Collins, R. W.; Allara, D. L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 246, 90-94.
44. The oxygen-free deposition on TS-Pt substrates resulted in the lowest overall O 1s signals in our study. For C6SH/TS-Pt, the Scofield-adjusted Intensity ratios (same units as in Table SI2) are 227 for the C2 and C3 components, 220 for O Is, and 101 for S2, The total intensity of the oxidized C components is equal to the total 0 signal; thus, the data are consistent with essentially no PtO, on the surface while S2 is still present.
45. Each of the alkanethiol molecules contains two chemically distinct carbon atoms: one bound to the sulfur headgroup and one in the methyl group. The former is likely to have a BE higher than the alkyl carbons of the main C1 peak. The C2/C1 intensity ratios in fits to our data (Figure 6), however, are about one-half of what would be expected for ideal SAMs of respective thicknesses. An additional component of the appropriate intensity and BE shift of < 1 eV can be added without sacrificing the quality of the fits to account for the headgroup-bound carbons. The C2 and C3 components then must be interpreted as due to adventitious and/or solvent molecules, In the literature, assignment of C Is components with BE shifts of 1.2-1.6 eV (C2) and 2.7-3.6 eV (C3) varies, e.g., refs 6 and 27.
46. MacPhail, R. A.; Strauss, H. L.; Snyder, R. G.; Eiliger, C. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 334-341.
47. Snyder, R. G.; Strauss, H. L.; Elliger, C. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 5145-5150.
48. Arnold, R.; Terfort, A.; Woll, C. Langmuir 2001, 17, 4980-4989.
49. Yang, Y.-C.; Yen, Y.-P.; Yang, L.-Y. O.; Yau, S.-L.; Itaya, K. Langmuir 2004, 20, 10030-10037.
50. Puglia, C.; Nilsson, A.; Hernnas, B.; Karis, O.; Bennich, P.; Martensson, N. Surf. Sci. 1995, 342, 119-133.
51. Stipe, B. C.; Rezaei, M. A.; Ho, W. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 6443-6447.
52. Saliba, N.; Tsai, Y. L.; Panja, C.; Koel, B. E. Surf. Sci. 1999, 419, 79-88.
53. Gambardella, P.; Sljivancanin, Z.; Hammer, B.; Blanc, M.; Kuhnke, K.; Kern, K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 8705.
54. Bancroft, Q. M.; Adams, I.; Coatsworth, L. L.; Bennewitz, C. D.; Brown, J. D.; Westwood, W. D. Anal. Chem. 1975, 47, 586-588.
55. Li, Z. Y.; Beck, P.; Ohlberg, D. A. A.; Stewart, D. R.; Williams, R. S. Surf. Sci. 2003, 529, 410-418.
56. Uncertainties are one standard deviation averaged over five measurement series.
57. The unique extraction of dielectric constants from ultrathin (≤10 nm) films is problematic as the film thickness and index become correlated. The correlation coefficient between thickness and the real pan of the index (n) was ∼0,93. However, the estimated parameters are considered unique, as the statistical estimate of the fit uncertainties on thickness and n, accounting for the off-diagonal elements of the error matrix, are comparable to (∼50% smaller than) the reported uncertainties based on multiple data sets.
58. Gottesfeld, S.; Maia, G.; Floriane, J. B.; Tremiliosi, G.; Ticianelli, E. A.; Gonzalez, E. R. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1991, 138, 3219-3224.
59. Lang, P.; Mekhalif, Z.; Rat, B.; Garnier, F. J. Electroanal, Chem. 1998, 441 83-93
60. Toulhoat, H.; Raybaud, P.; Kasztelan, S.; Kresse, O.; Hafner, J. Catal. Today 1999, 50, 629-636.
61. Polcik, M.; Wilde, L.; Haase, J.; Brena, B.; Comelli, G.; Paolucci, G. Surf. Sci. 1997, 381, L568-L572.
62. Zhamikov, M.; Frey, S.; Heister, K.; Grunze, M. Langmuir 2000, 16, 2697-2705.
63. The BE reported in ref 65 for S 2p in bulk PtS is 162.9 eV is closer to S2 rather than S1. Only for bulk PtSz is the BE comparable at 162.4 eV (ref 66), but creating a stoichiometry similar to PtS: at the surface would require C-S bond scission for the majority of alkylthiolates, i.e., such an assignment for SI is incompatible with the rest of the data.
64. Heister, K.; Zhamikov, M.; Grunze, M.; Johansson, L. S. O.; Ulman, A. Langmuir 2001, 17, 8-11.
65. Dembowski, I.; Marosi, L.; Essig, M. Surf, Sci. Spectra 1993, 2, 104-108.
66. Dembowski, I.; Marosi, L.; Essig, M. Surf. Sci. Spectra 1993, 2, 133-137.
67. Lee, M. T.; Hsueh, C. C.; Freund, M. S.; Ferguson, G. S. Langmuir 1998, 14, 6419-6423.
68. Fisher, C. J.; Woodruff, D. P.; Jones, R. G.; Cowie, B. C. C.; Formoso, V. Surf. Sci. 2002, 496, 73-86.
69. Kariapper, M. S.; Fisher, C.; Woodruff, D. P.; Cowie, B. C. C.; Jones, R. G. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2000, 12, 2153-2161.
70. Jackson, G. J.; Woodruff, D. P.; Jones, R. G.; Singh, N. K.; Chan, A. S. Y.; Cowie, B. C. C.; Formoso, V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 119-122.
71. Kariapper, M. S.; Grom, G. F.; Jackson, G. J.; McConville, C. F.; Woodruff, D. P. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1998, 10, 8661-8670.
72. Mullins, D. R.; Huntley, D. R.; Overbury, S. H. Surf. Sci. 1995, 323, L287-L292.
73. Mullins, D. R.; Tang, T.; Chen, X.; Shneerson, V.; Saldin, D. K.; Tysoe, W. T. Surf. Sci. 1997, 372, 193-201.
74. Lee, J. J.; Fisher, C. J.; Bittencourt, C.; Woodruff, D. P.; Chan, A. S. Y.; Jones, R. O. Surf. Sci. 2002, 516, 1-15.
75. Sweeney, T. M. M.S. Thesis, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, 2004
76. Yang, M.; Laracuente, A. R.; Whitman, L. J. Unpublished results, 2005.
77. Powell, C. J.; Jablonski, A. NIST Electron Effective-Attenuation-Length Database, version 1,0 (SRD-82); U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 2001.
78. Jablonski, A.; Powell, C. J. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2002, 47, 35-91.
79. Petrovykh, D. Y.; Kimura-Suda, H.; Tarlov, M. J.; Whitman, L. J. Langmuir 2004, 20, 429-440.
80. Tanuma, S.; Powell, C. J.; Penn, D. R. Surf. Interface Anal. 1994, 21, 165-176.
81. Tanuma, S.; Shiratori, T.; Kimura, T.; Goto, K.; Ichimura, S.; Powell, C. J. Surf. Interface Anal. 2005, 37, 833-845.
82. Powell, C. J.; Jablonski, A. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1999, 28, 19-62.
83. Powell, C. J.; Jablonski, A. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A1999, 17, 1122-1126.