Analysis of the regulation of lin-41 during chick and mouse limb development

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 234, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 948-960

  Lancman, Joseph J ^a   Caruccio, Nicholas C ^a,b   Harfe, Brian D ^c   Pasquinelli, Amy E ^d   Schageman, Jeoffrey J ^e   Pertsemlidis, Alexander ^e   Fallon, John F ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b PROMEGA CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f Department of Anatomy ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental timing; Fgf; Heterochronic gene; Let 7; Limb development; Lin 41; miR 125; miRNA; Muscle development; Pattern formation; Shh; Sonic Hedgehog; Vascular development

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; MICRORNA; SONIC HEDGEHOG PROTEIN;

3' UNTRANSLATED REGION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOINFORMATICS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; IN VIVO STUDY; LET 7 GENE; LIMB DEVELOPMENT; LIN 4 GENE; LIN 41 GENE; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOUSE; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; NORTHERN BLOTTING; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; RNA BINDING; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; BLOTTING, NORTHERN; CHICK EMBRYO; CLONING, MOLECULAR; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EXTREMITIES; GENE COMPONENTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MICE; MICE, MUTANT STRAINS; MICRORNAS; MICROSPHERES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

ANIMALIA; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; ERINACEIDAE;

EID: 28444491759     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.20591     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ambros V. 2000. Control of developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10:428-433.
2. Ambros V, Horvitz HR. 1984. Heterochronic mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 226:409-226.
3. Amthor H, Christ B, Weil M, Patel K. 1998. The importance of timing differentiation during limb muscle development. Curr Biol 8:642-652.
4. Bettinger JC, Lee K, Rougvie AE. 1996. Stage-specific accumulation of the terminal differentiation factor LIN-29 during Caenorhabditis elegans development. Development 122:2517-2527.
5. Borden KL. 1998. RING fingers and B-boxes: zinc-binding protein-protein interaction domains. Biochem Cell Biol 76:351-358.
6. Boulet AM, Moon AM, Arenkiel BR, Capecchi MR. 2004. The roles of Fgf4 and Fgf8 in limb bud initiation and outgrowth. Dev Biol 273:361-382.
7. Bren-Mattison Y, Olwin BB. 2002. Sonic hedgehog inhibits the terminal differentiation of limb myoblasts committed to the slow muscle lineage. Dev Biol 242: 130-148.
8. 2: Shh-independent outgrowth and polarizing activity. Dev Biol 212:137-149.
9. Chiang C, Litingtung Y, Harris MP, Simandl BK, Li Y, Beachy PA, Fallon JF. 2001. Manifestation of the limb prepattern: limb development in the absence of sonic hedgehog function. Dev Biol 236: 421-435.
10. Christ B, Brand-Saberi B. 2002. Limb muscle development. Int J Dev Biol 46:905-914.
11. Doench JG, Sharp PA. 2004. Specificity of microRNA target selection in translational repression. Genes Dev 18:504-511.
12. Dudley AT, Ros MA, Tabin CJ. 2002. A re-examination of proximodistal patterning during vertebrate limb development. Nature 418:539-544.
13. Echelard Y, Epstein DJ, St Jacques B, Shen L, Mohler J, McMahon JA, McMahon AP. 1993. Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation on CNS polarity. Cell 75:1417-1430.
14. Gibson-Brown JJ, Agulnick SI, Chapman DL, Alexiou M, Garvey N, Silver LM, Papaioannou VE. 1996. Evidence of a role for T-box genes in the evolution of limb morphogenesis and the specification of forelimb/hindlimb identity. Mech Dev 56:93-101.
15. Gibson-Brown JJ, Agulnik SI, Silver LM, Niswander L, Papaioannou VE. 1998. Involvement of T-box genes Tbx2-Tbx5 in vertebrate limb specification and development. Development 125:2499-2509.
16. Grieshammer U, Minowada G, Pisenti JM, Abbott UK, Martin GR. 1996. The chick limbless mutation causes abnormalities in limb bud dorsal-ventral patterning: implications for the mechanism of apical ridge formation. Development 122:3851-3861.
17. Griffiths-Jones S. 2004. The microRNA Registry. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D109-D111.
18. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49-92.
19. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. 1992. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Dev Dyn 195:231-272.
20. Harfe BD. 2005. MicroRNAs in vertebrate development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15: 410-415.
21. Harfe BD, Scherz PJ, Tian H, McMahon AP, Tabin CJ. 2004. Evidence for an ex-pansion-based temporal Shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities. Cell 118:517-528.
22. Hui CC, Joyner AL. 1993. A mouse model of greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome: the extra-toesJ mutation contains an intragenic deletion of the Gli3 gene. Nature 3:241-246.
23. Isaac A, Rodriguez-Esteban D, Ryan A, Altabef M, Tsukui T, Patel K, Tickle C, Ispisua-Belmonte JC. 1998. Tbx genes and limb identity in chick embryo development. Development 125:1867-1875.
24. Johnson DR. 1967. Extratoes: a new mutant gene causing multiple abnormalities in the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol 17:543-581.
25. Kawakami Y, Capdevila J, Büscher D, Itoh T, Rodriguez Esteban C, Izpisua Belmonte JC. 2001. WNT signals control FGF-dependent limb initiation and AER induction in the chick embryo. Cell 104: 891-900.
26. Kloosterman WP, Wienholds E, Ketting RF, Plasterk RH. 2004. Substrate requirements for let-7 function in the developing zebrafish embryo. Nucleic Acids Res 32:6284-6291.
27. Kraus P, Fraidenraich D, Loomis CA. 2001. Some distal limb structures develop in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog signaling. Mech Dev 100:45-58.
28. Laufer E, Nelson C, Johnson RL, Morgan BA, Tabin C. 1994. Sonic hedgehog and Fgf-4 act through a signaling cascade and feedback loop to integrate growth and patterning of the developing limb bud. Cell 79:993-1003.
29. Lewandoski M, Sun X, Martin GR. 2000. Fgf8 signalling from the AER is essential for normal limb development. Nat Genet 26:460-463.
30. Lopez-Martinez A, Chang DT, Chiang C, Porter JA, Ros MA, Simandl BK, Beachy PA, Fallon JF. 1995. Limb-patterning activity and restricted posterior localization of the amino-terminal product of Sonic hedgehog cleavage. Curr Biol 5: 791-796.
31. Mansfield JH, Harfe BD, Nissen R, Obenauer J, Srineel J, Chaudhuri A, Farzan-Kashani R, Zuker M, Pasquinelli AE, Ruvkun G, Sharp PA, Tabin C, McManus MT. 2004. MicroRNA-responsive 'sensor' transgenes uncover Hox-like and other developmentally regulated patterns of vertebrate microRNA expression. Nat Genet 36:1079-1083.
32. Mariani FV, Martin GR. 2003. Deciphering skeletal patterning: clues from the limb. Nature 423:319-325.
33. Marti E, Takada R, Bumcrot DA, Sasaki H, McMahon AP. 1995. Distribution of Sonic hedgehog peptides in the developing chick and mouse embryo. Development 121:2537-2547.
34. Moon AM, Capecchi MR. 2000. Fgf8 is required for outgrowth and patterning of the limbs. Nat Genet 26:455-459.
35. Moorman AFM, Houweling AC, de Boer PAJ, Christoffels VM. 2001. Sensitive nonradioactive detection of mRNA in tissue sections: novel application of the whole-mount in situ hybridization protocol. J Histochem Cytochem 49:1-8.
36. Moss EG, Tang L. 2003. Conservation of the heterochronic regulator Lin-28, its developmental expression and microRNA complementary sites. Dev Biol 258:432-442.
37. Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Burke AC, Laufer E, DiMambro E, Murtaugh LC, Gonzales E, Tessarollo L, Parada LF, Tabin C. 1996. Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. Development 122: 1449-1466.
38. Nieto MA, Patel K, Wilkinson DG. 1996. In situ analysis of chick embryos in whole mount and tissue sections. In: Bronner-Fraser M, editor. Methods in cell biology. New York: Academic Press. p 219-235.
39. Niswander L, Jeffrey S, Martin GR, Tickle C. 1994. A positive feedback loop coordinates growth and patterning in the vertebrate limb. Nature 371:609-612.
40. Noramly S, Pisenti J, Abbott U, Morgan B. 1996. Gene expression in the limbless mutant: polarized gene expression in the absence of Shh and an AER. Dev Biol 179:339-346.
41. Pasquinelli AE, Ruvkun G. 2002. Control of developmental timing by micrornas and their targets. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 18:495-513.
42. Pasquinelli AE, McCoy A, Jimenez E, Salo E, Ruvkun G, Martindale MQ, Baguna J. 2003. Expression of the 22 nucleotide let-7 heterochronic RNA throughout the Metazoa: a role in life history evolution? Evol Dev 5:372-378.
43. Pasquinelli AE, Hunter S, Bracht J. 2005. MicroRNAs: a developing story. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15:200-205.
44. Pasquinelli AE, Reinhart BJ, Slack FJ, Martindale MQ, Kuroda MI, Maller B, Hayward DC, Ball EE, Degan B, Müller P, Spring J, Srinivasan A, Fishman MC, Finnerty J, Corbo J, Levine M, Leahy P, Davidson E, Ruvkun G. 2000. Conservation of the sequence and temporal expression of let-7 heterochronic regulatory RNA. Nature 408:86-89.
45. Pearse RV Jr, Tabin CJ. 1998. The molecular ZPA. J Exp Zool 282:677-690.
46. Pourquie O. 2003. The segmentation clock: converting embryonic time into spatial pattern. Science 301:328-330.
47. Reymond A, Meroni G, Fantozzi A, Merla G, Cairo S, Luzi L, Riganelli D, Zanaria E, Messali S, Cainarca S, Guffanti A, Minucci S, Pelicci PG, Ballabio A. 2001. The tripartite motif family identifies cell compartments. EMBO J 20:2140-2151.
48. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E, Tabin C. 1993. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75:1401-1416.
49. Ros MA, Lopez-Martinez A, Simandl BK, Rodriguez C, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Dahn R, Fallon JF. 1996. The limb field mesoderm determines initial limb bud anteroposterior asymmetry and budding independent of sonic hedgehog or apical ectodermal gene expressions. Development 122:2319-2330.
50. Ros MA, Simandl BK, Clark AW, Fallon JF. 2000. Methods for manipulating the chick limb bud to study gene expressions, tissue interactions and patterning. In: Tuan RS, Lo CW, editors. Development biology protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, p 245-266.
51. Ros MA, Dahn RD, Fernandez-Teran M, Rashka K, Caruccio NC, Hasso SM, Bitgood JJ, Lancman JJ, Fallon JF. 2003. The chick oligozeugodactyly (ozd) mutant lacks sonic hedgehog function in the limb. Development 130:527-537.
52. Rougvie AE. 2001. Control of developmental timing in animals. Nat Rev Genet 2:690-701.
53. Rougvie AE, Ambros V. 1995. The heterochronic gene lin-29 encodes a zinc finger protein that controls a terminal differentiation event in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 121:2491-2500.
54. Rowe DA, Fallon JF. 1982. The proximodistal determination of skeletal parts in the developing chick leg. J Embryol Exp Morphol 68:1-7.
55. Rowe DA, Cairns JM, Fallon JF. 1982. Spatial and temporal patterns of cell death in limb bud mesoderm after apical ectodermal ridge removal. Dev Biol 93: 83-91.
56. Saunders JW. 1948. The proximo-distal sequence of origin of the parts of the chick wing and the role of the ectoderm. J Exp Zool 108:363-404.
57. Saurin AJ, Borden KL, Boddy MN, Freemont PS. 1996. Does this have a familiar RING? Trends Biochem Sci 21:208-214.
58. Schulman BRM, Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. 2005. Reciprocal expression of lin-41 and the miRNAs let-7 and mir-125 during mouse embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 234:1046-1054.
59. Searls RL. 1965. An autoradiographic study of the uptake of s35-sulfate during the differentiation of limb bud cartilage. Dev Biol 11:155-168. (submitted).
60. Slack FJ, Ruvkun G. 1998. A novel repeat domain that is often associated with RING finger and B-box motifs. Trends Biochem Sci 23:474-475.
61. Slack FJ, Basson M, Liu Z, Ambros V, Horvitz HR, Ruvkun G. 2000. The lin-41 RBCC gene acts in the C. elegans heterochronic pathway between the let-7 regulatory RNA and the LIN-29 transcription factor. Mol Cell 5:659.
62. Summerbell D. 1974. A quantitative analysis of the excision of the AER from the chick limb bud. J Embryol Exp Morphol 32:651-660.
63. Summerbell D, Lewis JH, Wolpert L. 1973. Positional information in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 244:492-496.
64. Sun X, Mariani FV, Martin GR. 2002. Functions of FGF signalling from the apical ectodermal ridge in limb development. Nature 418:501-508.
65. Thorogood PV, Hinchliffe JR. 1975. An analysis of the condensation process during chondrogenesis in the embryonic chick hind limb. J Embryol Exp Morphol 33:581-606.
66. Tickle C, Summerbell D, Wolpert L. 1975. Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 254:199-202.
67. Vella MC, Choi EY, Lin SY, Reinert K, Slack FJ. 2004a. The C. elegans microRNA let-7 binds to imperfect let-7 complementary sites from the lin-41 3'UTR. Genes Dev 18:132-137.
68. Vella MC, Reinert K, Slack FJ. 2004b. Architecture of a validated microRNA:target interaction. Chem Biol 11:1619-1623.
69. Wolpert L. 1969. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J Theor Biol 25:1-47.
70. Yang Y, Drossopoulou G, Chuang P-T, Duprez D, Marti E, Bumcrot D, Vargesson N, Clarke J, Niswander L, McMahon A, Tickle C. 1997. Relationship between dose, distance and time in Sonic Hedgehog-mediated regulation of anteroposterior polarity in the chick limb. Development 124:4393-4404.
71. Zákány J, Kmita M, Duboule D. 2004. A dual role for Hox genes in limb anterior-posterior asymmetry. Science 304:1669-1672.
72. Zuker M. 1989. On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA Molecule. Science 244: 48-52.