Methodology, epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research: An introduction

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 317-327

  Ortega, Lourdes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944506372     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00307.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (58)

1. Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89, 353-366.
2. Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 86, 525-545.
3. Bachman, L. F., & Cohen, A. D. (Eds.). (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Block, D. (1996). Not so fast: Some thoughts on theory culling, relativism, accepted findings and the heart and soul of SLA. Applied Linguistics, 17, 63-83.
5. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in SLA. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
6. Chapelle, C. A. (2005). Graduate-level research methods textbooks: Options and issues. Modern Language Journal, 89, 482-488.
7. Chapelle, C. A., & Duff, P. A. (Eds.). (2003). Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 157-178.
8. Cook, V. (Ed.). (2002). Portraits of the L2 user. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
9. Crookes, G. (1997). SLA and language pedagogy: A socioeducational perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 93-116.
10. Crookes, G. (2005). Resources for incorporating action research as critique into applied linguistics graduate education. Modern Language Journal, 89, 467-475.
11. Davis, K. A. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 427-453.
12. Dewaele, J.-M. (2005). Investigating the psychological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 89, 367-380.
13. Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of SLA. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14. Douglas, D. (2001). Performance consistency in second language acquisition and language testing research: A conceptual gap. Second Language Research, 17, 442-456.
15. Edge, J., & Richards, K. (1998). "May I see your warrant, please?" Justifying outcomes in qualitative research. Applied Linguistics, 19, 334-356.
16. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285-300.
17. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
18. Johnson, M. (2004). A philosophy of second language acquisition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Jordan, S. A. (2001). Writing the other, writing the self: Transforming consciousness through ethnographic writing. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1(1), 40-56.
20. Kern, R., & Schultz, J. M. (2005). Beyond orality: Investigating literacy and the literary in second and foreign language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 89, 381-392.
21. Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 84, 311-326.
22. Kramsch, C. (2002a). (Ed.). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum.
23. Kramsch, C. (2002b). Standard, norm, and variability in language learning. In S. Gass, K. Bardovi-Harlig, S. S. Magnan, & J. Walz (Eds.), Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 59-79). Philadelphia. PA: Benjamins.
24. Lantolf, J. P. (1996). SLA theory building: "Letting all the flowers bloom!" Language Learning, 46, 713-749.
25. Lantolf, J. P. (in press). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: State-of-the-art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
26. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1991). Second language acquisition research: Staking out the territory. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 315-350.
27. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Second language acquisition and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 165-181.
28. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2004). CA for SLA? It all depends. Modern Language Journal, 88, 603-607.
29. Lazaraton, A. (2003). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in applied linguistics: Whose criteria and whose research? Modern Language Journal, 87, 1-12.
30. Lightbown, P. M. (2000). Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431-462.
31. Long, M. H. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 649-666.
32. Long, M. H. (1993). Assessment strategies for second language acquisition theories. Applied Linguistics, 14, 225-249.
33. Magnan, S. S. (2001). MLJ editorial policy: Reflections on the profession, definition of its disciplines. Modern Language Journal, 85, 92-125.
34. Markee, N. (2004). (Ed.). Classroom talks [Special issue]. Modern Language Journal, 88(4).
35. Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88, 491-500.
36. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. New York: Arnold.
37. Mohan, B., & Beckett, G. H. (2001). A functional approach to research on content-based language learning: Recasts in casual explanation. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 133-155.
38. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 717-761). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
39. Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89, 427-443.
40. Pennycook, A. (2004). Critical applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 784-807). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
41. Pica, T. (1994). Questions from the language classroom: Research perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 49-79.
42. Pica, T. (2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. Modern Language Journal, 89, 339-352.
43. Rampton, B. (1995). Politics and change in research in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 16, 233-256.
44. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
46. Sharwood Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. New York: Longman.
47. Shohamy, E. (2000). The relationship between language testing and second language acquisition, revisited. System, 28, 541-553.
48. Spada, N. (2005). Conditions and challenges in developing school-based SLA research programs. Modern Language Journal, 89, 328-338.
49. Spolsky, B. (1990). Introduction to a colloquium: The scope and form of a theory of second language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 609-616.
50. Sridhar, S. N. (1994). A reality check for SLA theories. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 800-805.
51. Swain, M., Lapkin, S., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 486-506.
52. Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. Modern Language Journal, 89, 393-409.
53. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). United States Census 2000. Retrieved March 22, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/.
54. Valdés, G. (2005). Bilingualism, heritage language learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost or seized? Modern Language Journal, 89, 410-426.
55. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-259). New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (2004). Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. Modern Language Journal, 88, 331-350.
57. Yates, L. (2005). Introducing new researchers to qualitative research: Some current options for textbooks. Modern Language Journal, 89, 475-482.
58. Zuengler, J., & Cole, K. M. (2004, May). Problematizing and pluralizing "sociocultural theory." Colloquium convened at the American Association for Applied Linguistics annual conference, Portland, OR.