The relationship between language testing and second language acquisition, revisited

System

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 541-553

  Shohamy, Elana ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Data collection; Interaction; Language testing; Relevance; Second language acquisition; Second language research

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034411948     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00037-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bachman, L.F., 1998. Language testing - SLA research interfaces. In: Bachman, L., Cohen, A. (Eds.), Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 177-195.
2. Bachman, L.F., Cohen, A., 1998. Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Belgar, D., Hunt, A., 1999. Revising and validating the 2000 word level and University word level vocabulary tests. Language Testing 16, 131-162.
4. Brindley, G., 1998. Describing language development? Rating scales and SLA. In: Bachman, L., Cohen, A. (Eds.), Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 112-140.
5. Brown, J.D., 1999. The relative importance of persons, items, subtests and languages to TOEFL test variance. Language Testing 16, 217-238.
6. Cardell, E., Chenery, H., 1999. A cognitive neuropsychological approach to the assessment and remediation of acquired dysgraphia. Language Testing 16 (3), 353-388.
7. Chapelle, C., 1998. Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In: Bachman, L., Cohen, A. (Eds.), Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 37-70.
8. Cohen, A., 1998. Strategies and processes in test taking and SLA. In: Bachman, L., Cohen, A. (Eds.), Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 90-111.
9. Douglas, D., 1998. Testing methods in context-based second language research. In: Bachman, L., Cohen, A. (Eds.), Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 141-155.
10. Freedle, R., Kostin, I., 1999. Does the text matter in a multiple-choice test of comprehension? The case for the construct validity of TOEFL's minitalks. Language Testing 16 (1), 2-32.
11. Holm, A., Dodd, B., Stow, C., Pert, S., 1999. Identification and differential diagnosis of phonological disorders in bilingual children. Language Testing 16 (3), 271-292.
12. Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., Fearnow, S., 1999. Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. SSLA 21, 421-452.
13. Kormos, J., 1999. Simulating conversations in oral-proficiency assessment: A conversation analysis of role play and non-scripted interviews in language exams. Language Testing 16, 163-188.
14. Laufer, B., Nation, P., 1999. A vacabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16 (1), 33-51.
15. Mackey, A., 1999. Input, interaction, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 557-587.
16. Marquardt, I., Gillian, R., 1999. Assessment in communication disorders: Some observations on current issues. Language Testing 249-269.
17. Moyer, A., 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factor of age, motiviation and instruction. SSLA 21, 81-108.
18. Myles, F, Mitchell, R., Hopper, J., 1999. Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction? SSLA 21, 49-80.
19. Ortega, L., 1999. Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 109-148.
20. Papjohn, D., 1999. The effect of topic variation in performance testing: The case of the chemistry TEACH test for international teaching assessment. Language Testing 16 (1), 52-81.
21. Pienemann, M., Hakansson, G., 1999. A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. SSLA 21 (3), 383-420.
22. Rosa, E., O'Neill, M., 1999. Explicitness. Intake and the Issue of Awareness: Another Piece to the Puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 451-556.
23. Rott, S., 1999. The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 557-619.
24. Saito, H., 1999. Dependence and interaction in frequency data analysis in second language acquisition research. SSLA 21, 453-475.
25. Schmitt, N., 1999. The relative importance of persons, items, subtests and languages to TOEFL test variance. Language Testing 16, 189-216.
26. Shohamy, E., 1998. How can language testing and second language acquisition benefit from each other: The case of discourse. In: Bachman, L., Cohen, A. (Eds.), Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 156-176.
27. Tarone, E., 1998. Research on interlanguage variation: Implications for language testing. In: Bachman, L., Cohen, A. (Eds.), Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 71-89.
28. Williams, J., 1999. Memory, attention and inductive learning. SSLA 21 (1), 1-48.
29. Windsor, J., 1999. Effect of semantic inconsistency on sentence grammaticality judgement for children with and without language learning disabilities. Language Testing 16 (3), 293-314.