On the Processing of Meaning from Parafoveal Vision During Eye Fixations in Reading

The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 213-234

  Rayner, Keith ^a   White, Sarah J ^b   Kambe, Gretchen ^c   Miller, Brett ^a   Liversedge, Simon P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942523936     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50013-X     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Altarriba J., Kambe G., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:875-890.
2. Balota D.A., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1985, 17:364-390.
3. Blanchard H.E., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1989, 46:85-94.
4. Brysbaert M., Vitu F. Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception 1998, 125-148. Elsevier, Oxford, England. G. Underwood (Ed.).
5. Carpenter P.A., Just M.A. What your eyes do while your mind is reading. Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes 1983, 275-307. Academic Press, New York. K. Rayner (Ed.).
6. Deutsch A., Frost R., Peleg S., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, in press.
7. Deutsch A., Frost R., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:487-506.
8. Ehrlich S.F., Rayner K. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20:641-655.
9. Engbert R., Longtin A., Kliegl R. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research 2002, 42:621-636.
10. Everatt J., Underwood G. Parafoveal guidance and priming effects during reading: A special case of the mind being ahead of the eyes. Consciousness and Cognition 1992, 1:186-197.
11. Garrod S., Terras M. The contributions of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 42:526-544.
12. Gautier V., O'Regan J.K., LaGargasson J.F. "The skipping" revisited in French: Programming saccades to skip the article "les". Vision Research 2000, 40:2517-2531.
13. Henderson J.M., Dixon P., Peterson A., Twilley L.C., Ferreira F. Evidence for the use of phonological representations during transaccadic word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:82-97.
14. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1990, 16:417-429.
15. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993, 47:201-221.
16. Hyönä J. Effects of thematic and lexical priming on readers' eye movements. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1993, 34:293-304.
17. Hyönä J. Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:68-81.
18. Hyönä J., Niemi P., Underwood G. Reading long words embedded in sentences: Informativeness of word halves affects eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:142-152.
19. Inhoff A.W. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:544-555.
20. Inhoff A.W., Radach R., Starr M., Greenberg S. Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. Reading as a Perceptual Process 2000, 221-246. Elsevier, Oxford. A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, J. Pynte (Eds.).
21. Inhoff A.W., Rayner K. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Preception & Psychophysics 1986, 40:431-439.
22. Inhoff A.W., Starr M., Shindler K.L. Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:1474-1484.
23. Jacobs A.M. On the role of blank spaces for eye-movement control in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 1987, 41:473-479.
24. Kambe G. Parafoveal processing of morphologically complex (prefixed) words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological decomposition in reading 2003, Submitted for publication.
25. Kennedy A. The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a preprocessing trade off. Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception 1998, 149-180. Elsevier, Oxford. G. Underwood (Ed.).
26. Kennedy A. Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A:429-455.
27. Kennedy A., Pynte J., Ducrot S. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 55A:1307-1338.
28. Kennison S.M., Clifton C. Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 1995, 21:68-81.
29. Kennison S.M., Gordon P.C. Comprehending referential expressions during reading: Evidence from eye tracking. Discourse Processes 1998, 24:229-252.
30. Lima S.D. Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26:84-99.
31. Liversedge S.P., Findlay J.M. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:6-14.
32. McConkie G.W., Rayner K. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixations in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1975, 17:578-586.
33. McConkie G.W., Zola D. Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1979, 25:221-224.
34. Morrison R.E., Rayner K. Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle. Perception & Psychophysics 1981, 30:395-396.
35. Murray W.S. Parafoveal pragmatics. Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception 1998, 181-200. Elsevier, Oxford. G. Underwood (Ed.).
36. Murray W.S., Rowan M. Early, mandatory, pragmatic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1998, 27:1-22.
37. O'Regan K. Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics 1979, 25:501-509.
38. O'Regan K. The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control. Perception & Psychophysics 1980, 28:112-117.
39. O'Regan K. Elementary perceptual and eye movement control processes in reading. Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes 1983, 121-140. Academic Press, New York. K. Rayner (Ed.).
40. O'Regan K., Lévy-Schoen A., Jacobs A.M. The effect of visibility on eye movement parameters in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1983, 34:457-464.
41. Pickering M.J., Traxler M.J. Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eyetracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:940-961.
42. Pollatsek A., Lesch M., Morris R.K., Rayner K. Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:148-162.
43. Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8:817-833.
44. Pollatsek A., Rayner K., Balota D.A. Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1986, 40:123-130.
45. Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D., Rayner K. Modeling eye movements in reading: Extending the E-Z Reader model. The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research 2003, 361-390. North-Holland, Amsterdam. J. Hyönä, R. Radach, H. Deubel (Eds.).
46. Radach R., Heller D. Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. Reading as a Perceptual Process 2000, 165-191. Elsevier, Oxford. A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, J. Pynte (Eds.).
47. Radach R., Krummenacher J., Heller D., Hofmeister J. Individual eye movement patterns in word recognition: Perceptual and linguistic factors. Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes and Applications 1995, 421-432. North-Holland, Amsterdam. J.M. Findlay, R. Walker, R.W. Kentridge (Eds.).
48. Rayner K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:65-81.
49. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin 1978, 85:618-660.
50. Rayner K. Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words. Perception 1979, 8:21-30.
51. Rayner K. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1986, 41:211-236.
52. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
53. Rayner K., Ashby J., Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model 2003, Submitted to publication.
54. Rayner K., Balota D.A., Pollatsek A. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1986, 40:473-483.
55. Rayner K., Bertera J.H. Reading without a fovea. Science 1979, 206:468-469.
56. Rayner K., Duffy S.A. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:191-201.
57. Rayner K., Fischer M.H. Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58:734-747.
58. Rayner K., Fischer M.H., Pollatsek A. Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research 1998, 38:1129-1144.
59. Rayner K., Inhoff A.W., Morrison R.E., Slowiaczek M.L., Bertera J.H. Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:167-179.
60. Rayner K., McConkie G.W. What guides a reader's eye movements?. Vision Research 1976, 16:829-837.
61. Rayner K., McConkie G.W., Zola D. Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:206-226.
62. Rayner K., Morris R.K. Eye movement control in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:163-172.
63. Rayner K., Morrison R.M. Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1981, 17:135-138.
64. Rayner K., Raney G.E. Eye movement control in visual search: Effects of word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:238-244.
65. Rayner K., Sereno S.C., Raney G.E. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:1188-1200.
66. Rayner K., Slowiaczek M.L., Clifton C., Bertera J.H. Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:912-922.
67. Rayner K., Well A.D. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1996, 3:504-509.
68. Rayner K., Well A.D., Pollatsek A., Bertera J.H. The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1982, 31:537-550.
69. Rayner K., Well A.D., Pollatsek A. Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1980, 27:537-544.
70. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105:125-157.
71. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research 1999, 39:4403-4411.
72. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 2002, in press.
73. Schroyens W., Vitu F., Brysbaert M., d'Ydewalle G. Eye movement control during reading: Foveal load and parafoveal processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999, 52A:1021-1046.
74. Starr M.S., Rayner K. Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5:156-163.
75. Underwood G. Eye movements during the comprehension of written language. Progress in the Psychology of Language 1985, Vol. 2:45-71. Erlbaum, London. A.W. Ellis (Ed.).
76. Underwood G., Binns A., Walker S. Attentional demands on the processing of neighbouring words. Reading as a Perceptual Process 2000, 247-268. Elsevier, Oxford. A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, J. Pynte (Eds.).
77. Underwood G., Bloomfield R., Clews S. Information influences the pattern of eye fixations during sentence comprehension. Perception 1988, 17:267-278.
78. Underwood G., Clews S., Everatt J. How do readers know where to look next? Local information distributions influence eye fixations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1990, 42A:39-65.
79. Underwood G., Clews S., Wilkinson H. Eye fixations are influenced by the distribution of information within words. Acta Psychologica 1989, 72:263-280.
80. White S.J., Liversedge S.P. Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2003, in press.