The influence of enantiomorphic transformation on transsaccadic object integration

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 243-255

  Henderson, John M ^a   Siefert, Amy B C ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033484550     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.243     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Antes, J. R. (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 62-70.
2. Becker, W. (1989). Metrics. In R. H. Wurtz & M. E. Goldberg (Eds.), The neurobiology of eye movements (pp. 95-137). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. Biederman, I., &Cooper, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and rotational invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
5. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
6. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
7. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Bridgeman, B., & Mayer, M. (1983). Failure to integrate visual information across successive eye fixations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 285-286.
9. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
10. Carlson-Radvansky, L., & Irwin, D. E. (1995). Memory for structural information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1441-1458.
11. Collewijn, H., Erkelens, C. J., & Steinman, R. M. (1988). Binocular co-ordination of human horizontal saccadic eye movements. Journal of Physiology, 404, 157-182.
12. Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., & Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 43-57.
13. Crane, H. D. (1994). The Purkinje image eyetracker, image stabilization, and related forms of stimulus manipulation. In D. H. Kelley (Ed.), WSHU/ science and engineering: Models and applications (pp. 15-89). New York: Marcel Dekker.
14. Crane, H. D., & Steele, C. M. (1985). Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker. Applied Optics, 24, 527-537.
15. Davidson, M. L., Fox, M. J., & Dick, A. O. (1973). Effect of eye movements on backward masking and perceived location. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 110-116.
16. Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
17. Di Lollo, V. (1977). Temporal characteristics of iconic memory. Nature, 267, 241-243.
18. Eriksen, C. W., & Collins, J. F. (1967). Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 476-484.
19. Feldman, J. A. (1985). Four frames suffice: A provisional model of vision and space. Behavioral and Brain Science, 8, 265-289.
20. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
21. Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1511-1521.
22. Henderson, J. M. (1992a). Identifying objects across saccades: Effects of extrafoveal preview and flanker object context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 521-530.
23. Henderson, J. M. (1992b). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and picture viewing. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition (pp. 260-283). New York: Springer-Verlag.
24. Henderson, J. M. (1993). Eye movement control during visual object processing: Effects of initial fixation position and semantic constraint. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 79-98.
25. Henderson, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
26. Henderson, J. M. (1997). Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object identification. Psychological Science, 8, 51-55.
27. Henderson, J. M., & Anes, M. D. (1994). Effects of object-file review and type priming on visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 826-839.
28. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
29. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance while reading and while watching dynamic scenes (pp. 269-293). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
30. Henderson, J. M., McClure, K., Pierce, S. J., & Schrock, G. (1997). Object identification without foveal vision: Evidence from an artificial scotoma paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 323-346.
31. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1987). The effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 449-463.
32. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 196-208.
33. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., Jr., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210-228.
34. Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 787-795.
35. Irwin, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 420-456.
36. Irwin, D. E. (1992). Perceiving an integrated visual world. In D. E. Meyer & S. Komblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 121-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Irwin, D. E. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 94-100.
38. Irwin, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Sun, J. (1988). Visual masking and visual integration across saccadic eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 276-287.
39. Irwin, D. E., Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1983). Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 35-46.
40. Jolicoeur, P., & Milliken, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 200-210.
41. Jonides, J., Irwin, D. E., & Yantis, S. (1982). Integrating visual information from successive fixations. Science, 215, 192-194.
42. Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C. C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68-81.
43. Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 395-416.
44. Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565-572.
45. Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899-917.
46. McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1976). Identifying the span of the effective stimulus in reading: Literature review and theories of reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes in reading (pp. 137-162). Newark, DE: International Reading Institute.
47. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
48. O'Regan, J. K., & Levy-Shoen, A. (1983). Integrating visual information from successive fixations: Does transsaccadic fusion exist? Vision Research, 23, 765-768.
49. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1992). What is integrated across fixations? In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 166-191). New York: Springer-Verlag.
50. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 426-442.
51. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 199-210.
52. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
53. Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Ehrlich, S. (1978). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206-226.
54. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1983). Is visual information integrated across saccades? Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 39-48.
55. Riggs, L. A. (1965). Visual acuity. In C. H. Graham (Ed.), Vision and visual perception (pp. 321-349). New York: Wiley.
56. Shepard, M., Findlay, J. M., & Hockey, R. J. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 38A, 475-491.
57. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
58. Srinivas, K. (1996). Size and reflection effects in priming: A test of transfer-appropriate processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 441-452.
59. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
60. Verfaillie, K., De Troy, A., & Van Rensbergen, J. (1994). Transaccadic integration of biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 649-670.
61. Volkmann, F. C. (1986). Human visual suppression. Vision Research, 26, 1401-1416.