Mixing costs and mixing benefits in naming words, pictures, and sums

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 556-575

  Lupker, Stephen J ^a   Kinoshita, Sachiko ^b   Coltheart, Max ^b   Taylor, Tamsen E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Homogenization pattern; Mixing cost pattern; Naming task; Pure vs. mixed blocks; Time criterion

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242654063     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00094-9     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for the strategic control of lexical and non-lexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644-652.
4. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616-647.
5. Campbell, J. I. D., & Fugelsang, J. (2001). Strategy choice for arithmetic verification: Effects of numerical surface form. Cognition, 80, 1321-1330.
6. Chateau, D., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Strategic effects in word naming: Examining the route-emphasis versus time-criterion accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 139-151.
7. Colombo, L., & Tabossi, P. (1992). Strategies and stress assignment: Evidence from a shallow orthography. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 319-342 . Amsterdam: North-Holland.
8. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
9. Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 416-431.
10. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
11. Desrochers, A., Gonthier, I., & Lupker, S. J., (2003, June). Frequency and consistency effects in French oral reading and lexical categorization: Evidence from two quasi-regular domains. Presented at the thirteenth annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Hamilton, Ontario.
12. Forrin, B. (1975). Naming latencies to mixed sequences of letters and digits. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 345-356). New York: Academic Press.
13. Glanzer, M., & Ehrenreich, S. L. (1979). Structure and search of the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 381-398.
14. Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 24-44.
15. Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychological Review, 75, 359-373.
16. Grice, G. R., & Hunter, J. J. (1964). Stimulus intensity effects depend on the type of experimental design. Psychological Review, 71, 247-256.
17. Kang, H., & Simpson, G. B. (2001). Local strategic control of information in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 29, 648-656.
18. Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole-word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 862-885.
19. Kello, C. T., & Plant, D. C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the temponaming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 719-750.
20. Kello, C. T., & Plant, D. C. (2003). Strategic control over rate of processing in word reading: A computational investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 207-232.
21. Kello, C. T., Plant, D. C., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 340-360.
22. Kinoshita, S., & Lupker, S. J. (2002). Effects of filler type in naming: Change in time criterion or attentional control of pathways? Memory & Cognition, 30, 1277-1287.
23. Kinoshita, S., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 405-415.
24. Kiger, J. I., & Glass, A. L. (1981). Context effects in sentence verification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 688-700.
25. Krueger, L. E., & Hallford, E. W. (1984). Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in sum verification. Memory & Cognition, 12, 171-180.
26. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
27. Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94, 145-188.
28. Los, S. A. (1999a). Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in mixed blocks of trials: Evidence for cost in switching between computational processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 3-23.
29. Los, S. A. (1999b). Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in pure and mixed blocks of trials: evidence for stimulus-driven switch costs. Acta Psychologica, 103, 173-205.
30. Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 570-590.
31. McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanism in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107-157.
32. Meiran, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 63, 234-249.
33. Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25-40.
34. Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 131-147.
35. Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translations of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 452-467.
36. Mozer, M. C., Colagrosso, M. D., & Huber, D. E. (2002). A rational analysis of cognitive control in a speeded discrimination task. In T. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (p. 14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Niemi, P. (1991). Constant vs. variable stimulus intensity and visual simple reaction time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 615-619.
38. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
39. Sanders, A. F. (1977). Structural and functional aspects of the reaction process. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
40. Sanders, A. F. (1990). Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica, 74, 123-167.
41. Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (1999). Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 17-50.
42. Simpson, G. B., & Kang, H. (1994). The flexible use of phonological information in word recognition in Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 319-331.
43. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
44. Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516-536.
45. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994a). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 318-341.
46. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994b). Strategies and automaticity: II. Dynamic aspects of strategy adjustment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 342-365.
47. Tabossi, P., & Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory & Cognition, 20, 303-313.
48. Taylor, T. E., & Lupker, S. J. (2001). Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 117-138.
49. Thomas, M. S. C., & Allport, A. (2000). Language switching costs in bilingual visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 44-66.
50. Zevin, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 121-135.