Association study designs for complex diseases

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 91-99

  Cardon, Lon R ^a   Bell, John I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETICS; HUMAN; REVIEW;

GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM;

EID: 0035257236     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35052543     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Mullikin, J. C. et al. An SNP map of human chromosome 22. Nature 407, 516-520 (2000).
2. Altshuler, D. et al. An SNP map of the human genome generated by reduced representation shotgun sequencing. Nature 407, 513-516 (2000).
3. Drews, J. & Ryser, S. The role of innovation in drug development. Nature Biotechnol. 15, 1318-1319 (1997).
4. Terwilliger, J. D. & Weiss, K. M. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of complex disease: fantasy or reality? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9, 578-594 (1998).
5. Gambaro, G., Anglani, F. & D'Angelo, A. Association studies of genetic polymorphisms and complex disease. Lancet 355, 309-111 (2000).
6. Weiss, K. M. & Terwilliger, J. D. How many diseases does it take to map a gene with SNPs? Nature Genet. 26, 151-157 (2000). This paper is essential reading for anyone undertaking association studies of common characters. The primary aim is to elucidate the difficulties in identifying genetic loci that contribute to complex traits. The literature cited covers some necessary population genetics material.
7. Risch, N. J. Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 405, 847-856 (2000). An excellent summary of current statistical procedures and their comparative strengths and weaknesses for complex trait mapping. Very useful for comparing linkage and association and for distinguishing familial influences on discrete versus quantitative traits.
8. Schork, N. J., Cardon, L. R. & Xu, X. The future of genetic epidemiology. Trends Genet. 14, 266-272 (1998).
9. Collins, F. Positional cloning moves from perditional to traditional. Nature Genet. 9, 347-350 (1995).
10. Lander, E. S. & Schork, N. J. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265, 2037-2048 (1994).
11. Risch, N. & Merikangas, K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273, 1516-1517 (1996).
12. Jorde, L. B. Linkage disequilibrium and the search for complex disease genes. Genome Res. 10, 1435-1444 (2000).
13. Xiong, M. & Guo, S. W. Fine-scale genetic mapping based on linkage disequilibrium: theory and applications. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 1513-1531 (1997).
14. Freimer, N. B. et al. Genetic mapping using haplotype, association and linkage methods suggests a locus for severe bipolar disorder (BPI) at 18q22-q23. Nature Genet. 12, 436-441 (1996).
15. Hastbacka, J. et al. Linkage disequilibrium mapping in isolated founder populations: diastrophic dysplasia in Finland. Nature Genet. 2, 204-211 (1992). This is becoming a classic paper on using disequilibrium/haplotype data to identify disease loci. The trait studied does not reflect the common disease framework of current widespread interest, but the procedures used offer a useful model from which to start.
16. Collins, A., Lonjou, C. & Morton, N. E. Genetic epidemiology of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 15173-15177 (1999). One of a series of key papers by these authors who compare disequilibrium measures, evaluate real data patterns to infer genome-wide marker spacing requirements, and combine population genetics principles with those of disease-gene mapping to characterize allelic association.
17. Eaves, I. A. et al. The genetically isolated populations of finland and sardinia may not be a panacea for linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes. Nature Genet. 25, 320-323 (2000).
18. Taillon-Miller, P. et al. Juxtaposed regions of extensive and minimal linkage disequilibrium in human Xq25 and Xq28. Nature Genet. 25, 324-328 (2000).
19. Nickerson, D. A. et al. DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene. Nature Genet. 19, 233-240 (1998).
20. Clark, A. G. et al. Haplotype structure and population genetic inferences from nucleotide-sequence variation in human lipoprotein lipase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 595-612 (1998).
21. Cargill, M. et al. Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nature Genet. 22, 231-238 (1999).
22. Halushka, M. K. et al. Patterns of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes for blood-pressure homeostasis. Nature Genet. 22, 239-247 (1999).
23. Templeton, A. R. et al. Recombinational and mutational hotspots within the human lipoprotein lipase gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 69-83 (2000).
24. Ott, J. Predicting the range of linkage disequilibrium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2-3 (2000).
25. Chapman, N. H. & Thompson, E. A. Linkage disequilibrium mapping: the role of population history, size, and structure. Adv. Genet. 42, 413-437 (2001).
26. Fisher, R. A. The rhesus factor: a study in scientific method. Am. Sci. 35, 95-103 (1947).
27. Tiwari, J. L. & Terasaki, P. I. HLA and Disease Associations (Springer, New York, 1985).
28. Lander, E. S. Array of hope. Nature Genet. 21, 3-4 (1999).
29. Risch, N. & Teng, J. Design and analysis of linkage disequilibrium studies for complex human diseases. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 1707 (1997).
30. Risch, N. & Teng, J. The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling. Genome Res. 8, 1273-1288 (1998).
31. Teng, J. & Risch, N. The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases. II. Individual genotyping. Genome Res. 9, 234-241 (1999).
32. Keavney, B. Genetic association studies in complex diseases. J. Hum. Hypertens. 14, 361-367 (2000).
33. Keavney, B. et al. Large-scale test of hypothesised associations between the angiotensin-converting-enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and myocardial infarction in about 5000 cases and 6000 controls. International Studies of Infarct Survival (ISIS) Collaborators. Lancet 355, 434-442 (2000). The need for association studies to involve thousands of patients is clearly shown by comparing the results of a number of typical, small studies with that of a large-scale, well-controlled design. Reference 33 offers a similar example for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
34. Altshuler, D. et al. The common PPARgamma Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes. Nature Genet. 26, 76-80 (2000).
35. Cambien, F. et al. Deletion polymorphism in the gene for angiotensin-converting enzyme is a potent risk factor for myocardial infarction. Nature 359, 641-644 (1992).
36. Arnheim, N., Strange, C. & Erlich, H. Use of pooled DNA samples to detect linkage disequilibrium of polymorphic restriction fragments and human disease: studies of the HLA class II loci. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 6970-6974 (1985).
37. Barcellos, L. F. et al. Association mapping of disease loci, by use of a pooled DNA genomic screen. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 734-747 (1997).
38. Daniels, J. et al. A simple method for analyzing microsatellite allele image patterns generated from DNA pools and its application to allelic association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 1189-1197 (1998).
39. Shaw, S. H., Carrasquillo, M. M., Kashuk, C., Puffenberger, E. G. & Chakravarti, A. Allele frequency distributions in pooled DNA samples: applications to mapping complex disease genes. Genome Res. 8, 111-123 (1998).
40. Kirov, G., Williams, N., Sham, P., Craddock, N. & Owen, M. J. Pooled genotyping of microsatellite markers in parent-offspring trios. Genome Res. 10, 105-115 (2000).
41. Falk, C. T. & Rubinstein, P. Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 51, 227-233 (1987).
42. Spielman, R. S., McGinnis, R. E. & Ewens, W. J. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52, 506-516 (1993). The TDT test and its immediate predecessors changed the way human genetic studies were conducted throughout the past decade. This is the original paper describing the method.
43. Spielman, R. S., McGinnis, R. E. & Ewens, W. J. The transmission/disequilibrium test detects cosegregation and linkage. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 54, 559-560 (1994).
44. Spielman, R. S. & Ewens, W. J. The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59, 983-989 (1996).
45. Sham, P. C. & Curtis, D. An extended transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) for multiallelic marker loci. Ann. Hum. Genet. 59, 323-326 (1995).
46. Spielman, R. S. & Ewens, W. J. A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: The sib transmission/disequilibrium test. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 450-458 (1998).
47. Curtis, D. Use of siblings as controls in case-control association studies. Ann. Hum. Genet. 61, 319-333 (1997).
48. Martin, E. R., Kaplan, N. L. & Weir, B. S. Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 439-448 (1997).
49. Allison, D. B. Transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 676-690 (1997).
50. Rabinowitz, D. A transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci. Hum. Hered. 47, 342-350 (1997).
51. Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R. & Cookson, W. O. A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 279-292 (2000).
52. Martin, E. R., Monks, S. A., Warren, L. L. & Kaplan, N. L. A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: The pedigree disequilibrium test. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 146-154 (2000).
53. Pritchard, L. E. et al. Analysis of the CD3 gene region and type 1 diabetes: application of fluorescence-based technology to linkage disequilibrium mapping. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 197-202 (1995).
54. Bennett, S. T. & Todd, J. A. Human type 1 diabetes and the insulin gene: Principles of mapping polygenes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 343-370 (1996).
55. Bennett, S. T. et al. Insulin VNTR allele-specific effect in type 1 diabetes depends on identity of untransmitted paternal allele. The IMDIAB Group. Nature Genet. 17, 350-352 (1997).
56. Merriman, T. R. et al. Transmission of haplotypes of microsatellite markers rather than single marker alleles in the mapping of a putative type 1 diabetes susceptibility gene (IDDM6). Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 517-524 (1998).
57. Eaves, I. A. et al. Transmission ratio distortion at the INS-IGF2 VNTR. Nature Genet. 22, 324-325 (1999).
58. Lernmark, A. & Ott, J. Sometimes it's hot, sometimes it's not. Nature Genet. 19, 213-214 (1998).
59. Goring, H. H. & Terwilliger, J. D. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 1310-1327 (2000).
60. Morton, N.E. & Collins, A. Tests and estimates of allelic association in complex inheritance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 11389-93 (1998).
61. Riordan, J. R. et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science 245, 1066-1073 (1989).
62. Rommens, J. M. et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: chromosome walking and jumping. Science 245, 1059-1065 (1989).
63. Kerem, B. et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis. Science 245, 1073-1080 (1989).
64. Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. Cell 72, 971-983 (1993).
65. Martin, E. R. et al. SNPing away at complex diseases: analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms around APOE in Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 383-394 (2000).
66. Martin, E. R. et al. Analysis of association at single nucleotide polymorphisms in the APOE region. Genomics 63, 7-12 (2000).
67. Horikawa, Y. et al. Genetic variation in the gene encoding calpain-10 is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nature Genet. 26, 163-175 (2000).
68. Roses, A. D. Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine. Nature 405, 857-865 (2000).
69. Keavney, B. et al. Measured haplotype analysis of the angiotensin-I converting enzyme gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1745-1751 (1998). The ACE locus and ACE phenotype is a model quantitative system. Despite the unusually clear haplotype relationships in this gene and population, the study clearly demonstrates the difficulty in distinguishing which specific variants are responsible for phenotypic variability.
70. Moffatt, M. F., Traherne, J. A., Abecasis, G. R. & Cookson, W. O. Single nucleotide polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium within the TCR alpha/delta locus. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 1011-1019 (2000).
71. Abecasis, G. R. et al. Patterns of linkage disequilibrium from three genomic regions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68, 191-197 (2001).
72. Farrall, M. et al. Fine-mapping of an ancestral recombination breakpoint in DCP1. Nature Genet. 23, 270-271 (1999).
73. Abecasis, G. R., Cookson, W. O. & Cardon, L. R. Pedigree tests of transmission disequilibrium. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 8, 545-551 (2000).
74. Todd, J. A. et al. Identification of susceptibility loci for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus by trans-racial gene mapping. Nature 338, 587-589 (1989).
75. Mijovic, C. H., Barnett, A. H. & Todd, J. A. Genetics of diabetes. Trans-racial gene mapping studies. Baillieres Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 5, 321-340 (1991).
76. Cardon, L. R. & Watkins, H. Waiting for the working draft from the human genome project: A huge achievement, but not of immediate medical use. Br. Med. J. 320, 1221-1222 (2000).
77. Kruglyak, L. Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes. Nature Genet. 22, 139-144 (1999). Mathematical population genetics modelling is used to simulate background levels of linkage disequilibrium in the genome, indicating that very fine-scale maps are required for disease gene association mapping. Although hotly contested and not always supported by empirical reports, this paper clearly outlines the Issues and importance of disequilibrium levels in the genome.
78. Collins, A. & Morton, N. E. Mapping a disease locus by allelic association. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1741-1745 (1998).
79. Cox, N. J. et al. Loci on chromosomes 2 (NIDDM1) and 15 interact to increase susceptibility to diabetes in Mexican Americans. Nature Genet. 21, 213-215 (1999).
80. Risch, N. Evolving methods in genetic epidemiology. 2. Genetic linkage from an epidemiologic perspective. Epidemiol. Rev. 19, 24-32 (1997).
81. Potter, J. D. At the interfaces of epidemiology, genetics and genomics. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 142-147 (2001).
82. Khoury, M. J., Beaty, T. H. & Cohen, B. H. Fundamentals of Genetic Epidemiology (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1993).
83. Huttley, G. A., Smith, M. W., Carrington, M. & O'Brien, S. J. A scan for linkage disequilibrium across the human genome. Genetics 152, 1711-1722 (1999).
84. Goddard, K. A., Hopkins, P. J., Hall, J. M. & Witte, J. S. Linkage disequilibrium and allele-frequency distributions for 114 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in five populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 216-234 (2000).
85. Majewski, J. & Ott, J. GT repeats are associated with recombination on human chromosome 22. Genome Res. 10, 1108-1114 (2000).
86. Abbott, A. Manhattan versus Reykjavik. Nature 406, 340-342 (2000).
87. Borecki, I. B. & Suarez, B. K. Linkage and association: basic concepts. Adv. Genet. 42, 45-66 (2001).
88. Slatkin, M. Linkage disequilibrium in growing and stable populations. Genetics 137, 331-336 (1994).
89. Hartl, D. L. & Clark, A. G. Principles of Population Genetics (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 1997).
90. Pritchard, J. K. & Rosenberg, N. A. Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 220-228 (1999). This paper describes the use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification, with minimal mathematical complexity. The key issues of marker spacing and informativeness are evaluated in detail. Reference 94 should be read in follow-up of this paper to see how stratification can be accounted for when it is present.
91. Devlin, B. & Roeder, K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55, 997-1004 (1999).
92. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945-959 (2000).
93. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., Rosenberg, N. A. & Donnelly, P. Association mapping in structured populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 170-181 (2000).
94. Bacanu, S. A., Devlin, B. & Roeder, K. The power of genomic control. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 1933-1944 (2000).
95. Witte, J. S., Elston, R. C. & Schork, N. J. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Nature Genet. 12, 355-358 (1996).