An Introduction to Theory and Research in Task Sequencing and Instructed Second Language Learning

Task Sequencing and Instructed Second Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-34

  Baralt, Melissa ^a   Gilabert, Roger ^b   Robinson, Peter ^c  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c AOYAMA GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85201487944     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (126)

1. Albert, A. (2011). When individual differences come into play: The effect of learner creativity on simple and complex task performance. In P. Robinson (ed.) Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 239-64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Baralt, M. (2013). The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 1-37.
3. Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin and D. Murphy (eds), Language Learning Tasks (pp. 23-46). London: Prentice Hall.
4. Breen, M. and Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89-112.
5. Bygate, M., Norris, J. and Van den Branden, K. (2009). Understanding TBLT at the interface of research and pedagogy. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M. and Norris, J. (eds), Task-based Language Teaching: A Reader (pp. 495-500). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. (2001). Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. London: Longman.
7. Cadierno, T. and Robinson, P. (2009). Language typology, task complexity and the development of L2 lexicalization patterns for describing motion events. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 245-76.
8. Candlin, C. N. (1984). Syllabus design as a critical process. In C. J. Brumfit (ed.), General English Syllabus Design: Curriculum and Syllabus Design for the General English Classroom (pp. 29-46). London: The British Council and Pergamon Press.
9. Clarke, D. (1991). The negotiated syllabus: What is it and is it likely to work? Applied Linguistics, 12, 13-28.
10. Collentine, K. (2010). Measuring complexity in task-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. In M. Thomas and H. Reinders (eds), Task-based Language Learning and Teaching with Technology (pp. 105-28). New York: Continuum.
11. Craik, F. and Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-84.
12. Crookes, G. and Gass, S. (1993). Tasks in a Pedagogical Context: Integrating Theory and Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
13. Declerck, M. and Kormos, J. (2012). The effects of dual task demands and proficiency on second language speech production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 782-96.
14. Dick, W., Carey, L. and Carey, J. (2005). The Systematic Design of Instruction (6th edn). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
15. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Ellis, R. and Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring Language Pedagogy Through Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Routledge.
17. Gagne, R.M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning (4th edn). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18. García Mayo, M. (2007). Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
19. Gilabert, R. (2007a). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and [+/-here-and-now]: Effects on L2 oral production. In M. P. García Mayo (ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning (pp. 44-68). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
20. Gilabert, R. (2007b). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 215-40.
21. Gilabert, R., Barón, J. and Levkina, M. (2011). Manipulating task complexity across task types and modes. In P. Robinson (ed.) Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 105-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Gilabert, R., Barón, J., and Llanes, À. (2009). Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners’ interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 367-95.
23. Gilabert, R. and Révész, A. (2013). Cognitive Approaches to Task-based Instruction. Symposium convened at the 5th TBLT Conference, October, Banff, Canada.
24. Givon, T. (1985). Function, structure and language acquisition. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, (pp. 1008-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Healy, A. and Kole, J. (2013). Depth of processing. In P. Robinson (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 164-5). New York: Routledge.
26. Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of rehearsal, elaboration and automaticity. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (349-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effects of task complexity and language proficiency on task-based language performance. Journal of Asia TEFL, 3, 193-225.
28. Ishikawa, T. (2007). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the (+/-here-and-now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. P. García Mayo (ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning (pp. 136-56). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
29. Ishikawa, T. (2008a). Investigating the effects of intentional reasoning demands on L2 speech production. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan.
30. Ishikawa, T. (2008b). The effects of task demands of intentional reasoning on L2 speech performance. Journal of Asia TEFL, 5, 29-63.
31. Ishikawa, T. (2011). Examining the effects of intentional reasoning demands on learner perceptions of task difficulty and L2 monologic speech. In P. Robinson (ed.) Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 307-28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Iwashita, N., McNamara, T. and Elder, C. (2001). Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information-processing approach to task design. Language Learning, 51, 401-36.
33. Jackson, D. O. and Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The Cognition Hypothesis: A synthesis and meta analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63 (2), 330-67.
34. Jonassen, D., Tessmer, M. and Hannum, W. (1999). Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37, 254-68.
36. Kim, Y. (2012). Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learners’ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 627-58.
37. Kim, Y. and Tracy-Ventura, N. (2011). Task complexity, language anxiety and the development of the simple past. In P. Robinson (ed.) Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 287-306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Klein, W. and Purdue, C. (1993). Utterance structure. In C. Purdue (ed.), Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-linguistic Perspectives, Vol. II: The Results (pp. 4-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Kormos, J. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 148-61.
40. Kormos, J. and Trebits, A. (2011). Working memory capacity and narrative task performance. In P. Robinson (ed.) Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 268-85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
42. Kuiken, F., Mos, M. and Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. García Mayo and J. Cenoz (eds), Eurosla Yearbook, 5 (pp. 195-222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Kuiken, F., and Vedder, I. (2007a). Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. In M. García Mayo (ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning (pp. 117-35). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
44. Kuiken, F., and Vedder, I. (2007b). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 261-84.
45. Kuiken, F., and Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48-60.
46. Kuiken, F., and Vedder, I. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 91-104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013). Complexity theory/Dynamic Systems Theory. In P. Robinson (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 103-6). New York: Routledge.
48. Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2007). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Lee, Y. (2002). Effects of Task Complexity on the Complexity and Accuracy of Oral Production in L2 Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i, Manoa.
50. Levkina, M. and Gilabert, R. (2012). The effects of cognitive task complexity on L2 oral production. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, and I. Vedder (eds), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA (pp. 171-98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
51. Long, M. H. (1996). The linguistic environment for second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia (eds), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 413-68). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Long, M. H. and Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27-55.
54. Malicka, A. and Levkina, M. (2012). Measuring task complexity: Does EFL proficiency matter? In A. Shehadeh and C. Coombe (eds), Task-based Language Teaching in Foreign Language Contexts (pp. 43-66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
55. Michel, M. C. (2011a). Cognitive and Interactive Aspects of Task-based Performance in Dutch as a Second Language (Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam). Oisterwijk: BoxPress.
56. Michel, M. C. (2011b). Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2-performance. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 141-74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Michel, M. C. (2013). Effects of task complexity on the use of conjunctions in oral L2 task performance. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 178-95.
58. Michel, M. C., F. Kuiken, and I. Vedder (2007) Effects of task complexity and task condition on Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 241-59.
59. Michel, M. C., F. Kuiken, and I. Vedder (2012) Task complexity and interaction: (Combined) effects on task-based performance in Dutch as a second language. In L. Roberts, C. Lindqvist, C. Bardel and A. Abrahamsson (eds), EUROSLA Yearbook 2012 (pp. 164-90).
60. Norris, J. M. (2013). Measuring Task Complexity for Task-based Research. Paper presented at the colloquium ‘Methodological advances in TBLT research: measurement of task demands and processes’, at the annual conference of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Dallas, Texas (18 March 2013).
61. Nuevo, A. (2006). Task Complexity and Interaction: L2 Learning Opportunities and Interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
62. Nuevo, A., Adams, R. and Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner-learner interaction. In P. Robinson (ed.) Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 175-201). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63. Popham, W. and Baker, E. L. (1970). Establishing Instructional Goals. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
64. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Rahimpour, M. (1997). Task Condition, Task Complexity, and Variation in L2 Discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
66. Rahimpour, M. (2010). Current trends on syllabus design in foreign language instruction. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1660-4.
67. Rahimpour, M. and Hosseini, P. (2010). The impact of task complexity on L2 learners’ written narratives. English Language Teaching, 3, 198-205.
68. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437-70.
69. Révész, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 162-81.
70. Révész, A. and Gilabert, R. (2013). Methodological Advances in TBLT Research: Measurement of Task Demands and Processes. Symposium convened at the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Annual Conference, March, Dallas, USA.
71. Révész, A. and Han, Z. (2006). Task content familiarity, task type and efficacy of recasts. Language Awareness, 15, 160-79.
72. Révész, A., Sachs, R., and Mackey, A. (2011). Task Complexity, Uptake of Recasts, and Second Language Development. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 203-35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
73. Rezai, S. and Kasani, A. F. (2011). Task Complexity, Language Proficiency and Task-based Writing. Saarbrucken; VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
74. Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99-140.
75. Robinson, P. (1996a). Task Complexity and Second Language Syllabus Design: Data-based Studies and Speculations. (Special issue) University of Queensland Working Papers on Language and Linguistics (Vol. 1). Brisbane: Center for Language Teaching and Research.
76. Robinson, P. (1996b). Introduction: Connecting tasks, cognition and syllabus design. In P. Robinson (ed.), Task Complexity and Second Language Syllabus Design: Data-based Studies and Speculations. (Special issue) University of Queensland Working Papers on Language and Linguistics (Vol. 1) (pp. 1-14). Brisbane: Center for Language Teaching and Research.
77. Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
78. Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Robinson, P. (2003a). The Cognition Hypothesis, task design and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21 (2), 45-107.
80. Robinson, P. (2003b). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 631-78). Oxford: Blackwell.
81. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43 (1), 1-32.
82. Robinson, P. (2007a). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. P. García-Mayo (ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning (pp. 7-27). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
83. Robinson, P. (2007b). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 191-213.
84. Robinson, P. (2009). Syllabus design. In M. Long and C. Doughty (eds), Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 294-310). Oxford: Blackwell.
85. Robinson, P. (2010). Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Putz and L. Sicola (eds), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner’s mind. (pp. 243-68). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
86. Robinson, P. (2011a). Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
87. Robinson, P. (2011b). Task-based Language Learning. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
88. Robinson, P. (2011c). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 3-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
89. Robinson, P., Cadierno, T. and Shirai, Y. (2009). Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 38, 533-54.
90. Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. C. (2008). Conclusion: Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and L2 instruction-Issues for research. In P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis (eds), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 489-566). New York: Routledge.
91. Robinson, P. and Gilabert, R. (eds) (2007a). Task Complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and Second Language Instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (Special Issue), 45 (3). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
92. Robinson, P. and Gilabert, R. (2007b). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 161-76.
93. Robinson, P., Ting, S., and Urwin, J. (1995). Investigating second language task complexity. RELC Journal, 26, 62-79.
94. Salimi, A. and Dadashour, S. (2012a). Task complexity and language production dilemmas (Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis vs. Skehan’s Trade-off Model). Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46, 643-52.
95. Salimi, A. and Dadashour, S. (2012b). Task complexity and SL development: Does task complexity matter. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46, 726-35.
96. Samuda, V. and Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in Second Language Learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
97. Sasayama, S. and Izumi, S. (2012). Effects of task complexity and pre-task planning on Japanese EFL learners’ oral production. In A. Shehadeh and C. Coombe (eds), Task-based Language Teaching in Foreign Language Contexts (pp. 43-66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
98. Sato, C. (1990). The Syntax of Conversation in Interlanguage Development. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
99. Schank, R. (1999). Dynamic Memory Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
100. Schank, R. and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
101. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency. New York: Routledge.
103. Segalowitz, N. (2013). Automaticity. In P. Robinson (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 53-7). New York: Routledge.
104. Shehadeh, A., and Coombe, C. A. (2012). Task-based Language Teaching in Foreign Language Contexts: Research and Implementation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
105. Shiau, Y. S. and Adams, R. (2011). The effects of increasing reasoning demands on accuracy and complexity in oral L2 production. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 6, 121-46.
106. Shin, M. (2012). Effects of Task Modality Sequenced by Task Complexity, Lexical Aspect and Verb Regularity on Korean Students’ Learning of the English Past Tense. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, Seoul National University, South Korea.
107. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
108. Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109. Skehan, P. (2002). A non-marginal role for tasks. ELT Journal, 56, 289-95.
110. Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1-14.
111. Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 28, 510-32.
112. Skehan, P. and Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp.183-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
113. Steenkamp, A. and Visser, M. (2011). Using cognitive complexity analysis for the grading and sequencing of Ixhosa tasks in the curriculum design of a communication course for education students. Per Linguam, 27 (1), 11-27.
114. Thomas, M., and Reinders, H. (2010). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching with Technology. London: Continuum.
115. Torres, J. (2013). Heritage and Second Language Learners of Spanish: The Roles of Task Complexity and Inhibitory Control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
116. Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based Language Education: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
117. Van Geert, P. (2008). The Dynamic Systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92, 179-99.
118. von Stutterheim, C. and Klein, W. (1987). A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In C. Pfaff (ed.), First and Second Language Acquisition Processes (pp. 191-205). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
119. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120. Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
121. Williams, J. (2013). Form-meaning connection (FMC). In P. Robinson (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 249-52). New York: Routledge.
122. Willis, D. (1990). The Lexical Syllabus: A New Approach to Language Teaching. London: Collins.
123. Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-based Learning. London: Longman.
124. Wu, X., Lowyck, J., Sercu, L., and Elen, J. (2013a). Task complexity, student perceptions of vocabulary learning in EFL, and task performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (1), 160-81.
125. Wu, X., Lowyck, J., Sercu, L., and Elen, J. (2013b). Vocabulary learning from reading: examining interactions between task and learner related variables. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1-20.
126. Yalden, J. (1983). The Communicative Syllabus: Evolution, Design and Implementation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.