Task Complexity, Focus on L2 Constructions, and Individual Differences: A Classroom-Based Study

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 95, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 162-181

  Révész, Andrea ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857523193     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01241.x     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 29-51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37-74). Amsterdam/New York: Benjamins.
3. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.
4. Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
5. Cromer, R. (1974). The development of language and cognition: The cognition hypothesis. In B. Foss (Ed.), New perspectives in child development (pp. 184-252). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
6. Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dörnyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 137-158). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
8. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275-300.
10. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking talk to task. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
12. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
14. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1-23.
15. Foster, P., & Ohta, A. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402-430.
16. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 199-323.
17. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21, 354-375.
18. García Mayo, M. P. (Ed.). (2007). Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters LTD.
19. García Mayo, M. P., & Pica, T. (2000). L2 learner interaction in a foreign language setting: Are learning needs addressed?, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 35-58.
20. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the development of second languages. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575-611.
22. Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215-240.
23. Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Llanes, À. (2009). Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners' interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 367-395.
24. Halford, G., Cowan, N., & Andrews, G. (2007). Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 236-242.
25. Han, Z.-H. (2007). On the role of "meaning" in focus on form. In Z-H. Han (Ed.), Second language process (pp. 45-79). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
26. Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris and L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
27. Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37, 254-268.
28. Kormos, J. (2000) The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language Learning, 50, 343-84.
29. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2004). The interaction of linguistic and psychological variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachunterricht. [Online], 9(2).
31. Kuiken, F., Mos, M., & Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. del Pilar García Mayo, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook 5 (pp. 195-222). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. In M. del Pilar García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning (pp. 117-135). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
33. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
34. Lightbown, P. M. (2000). Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431-462.
35. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effect on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
36. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
37. Long, M. H. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interaction. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 8, 1-26.
38. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & B. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
39. Long, M. H. (2007). Recasts: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 27-56.
41. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative evidence in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
42. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
44. Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60, 501-533.
45. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
47. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
48. Mackey, A., & Sachs, R. (2011). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback and L2 development. Language Learning. DOI:.
49. Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85-104.
50. McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108-113.
51. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Michel, M., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 241-259.
53. Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11-37.
54. Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 377-405.
55. Niwa, Y. (2000). Reasoning demands of L2 tasks and L2 narrative production: Effects of individual differences in working memory, intelligence, and aptitude (Unpublished master's dissertation). Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo.
56. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555-578.
57. Nuevo, A. (2006). Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington DC.
58. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
59. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
60. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and Language Learning (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
61. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 437-470.
63. Révész, A. (in press). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning.
64. Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
66. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-678). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
67. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1-32.
68. Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 193-213.
69. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. (2008). Conclusions: Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and L2 instruction-Issues for research. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 489-545). New York/London: Routledge.
70. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161-176.
71. Sagarra, N. (2007). From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 229-248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave MacMillan.
73. Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 23-45). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
74. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
76. Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Skehan, P. (2007, September). Tradeoff and Cognition: Two hypotheses regarding attention during task-based performance. Plenary talk at the 2nd International Conference on Task-based Language Teaching, University of Hawaii.
78. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185-211.
79. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
83. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 99-118). London: Longman.
84. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. 1. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 171-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., & Scott Poole, M. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478.
87. Wickens, C. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
88. Wickens, C. (2007). Attention to the second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 177-191.
89. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583-625.