The effect of dual task demands and proficiency on second language speech production

Bilingualism

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 782-796

  Declerck, Mathieu ^a   Kormos, Judit ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

dual task; monitoring; second language production; second language proficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866250863     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728911000629     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417- 423.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829- 839.
3. Baddeley, A. D., Emslie, H., Kolodny, J., & Duncan, J. (1998). Random generation and the executive control of working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51 (A), 819-852. (Pubitemid 128462558)
4. Blackmer, E. R., & Mitton, J. L. (1991). Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech. Cognition, 39, 173-194.
5. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cook, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 886- 899.
8. Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. De Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529-555.
10. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283- 321.
11. Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Evans, F. J. (1978). Monitoring attention deployment by random number generation: Index to measure subjective randomness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12 (1), 35-38.
13. Fathman, A. K. (1980). Repetition and correction as an indication of speech planning and execution processes among second language learners. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (eds.), Towards a cross linguistic assessment of speech production, pp. 77-85.
14. Frankfurt: Peter D. Lang. Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1187-1199.
15. Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 410-419. (Pubitemid 29499809)
16. Gilabert R.The simultaneous manipulation along the planning time and +/- Here-and-Now dimensions: Effects on oral L2 production Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning
17. Gilabert, R. (2006). The simultaneous manipulation along the planning time and +/- Here-and-Now dimensions: Effects on oral L2 production. In M. P. García Mayo (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, pp. 44- 68. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
18. Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 215-240.
19. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Barkhuysen, P. N. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 181- 204. (Pubitemid 43878490)
20. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the Perceptual Loop Theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113-157.
21. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
22. Horton,W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996).When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59, 91-117.
23. Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale for the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 168-196. (Pubitemid 36561842)
24. Jahanshahi, M., Saleem, T. T., Ho, A. K., Dirnberger, G., & Fuller, R. R. (2006). Random number generation as an index of controlled processing. Neuropsychology, 20, 391- 399.
25. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 132, 47-70. (Pubitemid 37170598)
27. Kormos, J. (2000). The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language Learning, 50, 343- 384.
28. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Kormos, J. (2011). Speech production and the Cognition Hypothesis. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, pp. 39-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 146-164.
31. Lennon, P. (1984). Retelling a story in English as a second language. In H. W. Dechert, D. Möhle & M. Raupach (eds.), Second language productions, pp. 50-68. Tübingen: Günter Narr.
32. Lennon, P. (1991). Error: Some problems of definition, identification and distinction. Applied Linguistics, 12, 180- 195.
33. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 33, 41-103.
34. Levelt,W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Levelt,W. J. M. (1999). Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (eds.), Neurocognition of language, pp. 83-122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Levelt,W. J. M., Roelofs, A., &Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Science, 22, 1-38.
37. Martin, N., Weisberg, R. W., & Saffran, E. M. (1989). Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: Implications for models of lexical retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 462-485.
38. Navon, D. (1984). Resources - A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
39. Navon, D. (1989). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system; basic tenets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 191-213.
40. Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555-578.
41. Oomen, C. C. E., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 163-184. (Pubitemid 33750786)
42. Oomen, C. C. E.,&Postma,A. (2002). Limitations in processing resources and speech monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 163-184. (Pubitemid 34303209)
43. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.
44. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitation in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (ed.), Attention, pp. 155-189. Hove: Psychology Press.
45. Postma,A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97- 131.
46. Postma, A., & Kolk, H. (1992). The effects of noise masking and required accuracy on speech errors disfluencies and self-repairs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 537-544.
47. Postma, A., & Kolk, H. (1993). The covert repair hypothesis: Prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 472-487. (Pubitemid 23174682)
48. Poulisse, N. (1993). Slips of the tongue and their correction in L2 learner speech: Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. Presented at the 10thWorld Congress of Applied Linguistics, Amsterdam.
49. Poulisse,N.,&Bongaerts,T. (1994). First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15, 36-57.
50. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
51. Robinson, P. (2003). The Cognition Hypothesis of adult, taskbased language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45-107.
52. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1-32. (Pubitemid 41044120)
53. Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 237-257.
54. Roelofs, A. (2008). Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1580-1598.
55. Sanders,A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Sarno, K., & Wickens, C. D. (1995). The role of multiple resources in predicting time-sharing efficiency: An evaluation of three workload models in a multiple task setting. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 107-130.
57. Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4-27. (Pubitemid 126418369)
58. Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510-532.
59. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, pp. 183-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Towse, J. N., & Neil, D. (1998). Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 583- 591. (Pubitemid 128685513)
61. van Hest, E. (1996). Self-repair in L1 and L2 production. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
62. West,M. (1953). A general service list of Englishwords. London: Longman.
63. Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. Nickerson (ed.), Attention and performance (vol. VIII), pp. 239-257. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. Wickens, C. D. (2007). Attention to the second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 177-191.
65. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1-27. (Pubitemid 36188899)