Task Complexity and Task Sequencing in Traditional Versus Online Language Classes

Task Sequencing and Instructed Second Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 95-122

  Baralt, Melissa ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85201486487     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Ayoun, D. (2004). The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 31-55.
2. Baralt, M. (2013). The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 689-725.
3. Blake, R. J. (2011). Current trends in online language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 19-35.
4. Böhlke, O. (2003). A comparison of student participation levels by group size and language stages during chatroom and face-to-face discussions in German. CALICO Journal, 21, 1, 67-87.
5. Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning, 33, 343-77.
6. Chun, D. (2013). Contributions of tracking user behavior to SLA research. In Hubbard, P., Schulze, M. and Smith, B. (eds), Learner-Computer Interaction in Language Education: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert Fischer (pp. 256-62). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
7. De la Fuente, M. J. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 47-81.
8. Gilabert, R., Barón, J. and Llanes, À. (2009). Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners’ interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 367-95.
9. González-Lloret, M. (2003). Designing task-based CALL to promote interaction: En busca de esmeraldas. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 86-104.
10. Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18, 105-21.
11. Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 255-70.
12. Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37, 254-68.
13. Kim, Y. (2012). Task complexity, learning opportunities and Korean EFL learners’ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 627-58.
14. Kim, Y. and Tracy-Ventura, N. (2011). Task complexity, language anxiety and the development of the simple past. In P. Robinson (ed.) Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 287-306). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
15. Lai, C., Fei, F. and Roots, R. (2008). The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal, 26, 70-90.
16. Lai, C. and Li, G. (2011). Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO Journal, 28, 498-521.
17. Lai, C., and Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning and Technology, 10, 102-20.
18. Lamy, M. N. (2004). Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL, 16, 520-38.
19. Lee, L. (2001). Online interaction: Negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish. ReCALL, 13, 232-44.
20. Loewen, S. and Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chat room: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1-14.
21. Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555-78.
22. Nuevo, A. (2006). Task Complexity and Interaction: L2 Learning Opportunities and Interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
23. Nuevo, A.-M., Adams, R. and Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner-learner interaction In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 175-202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Ortega, L. (2009). Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (eds), Multiple Perspectives on Interaction in SLA: Research in Honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 226-53). New York: Routledge.
25. Pica, T., Kanagy, R. and Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language teaching and research. In G. Crookes and S. Gass (eds), Tasks in Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice (pp. 9-34). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
26. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437-70.
28. Révész, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 162-81.
29. Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99-140.
30. Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
32. Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 191-213.
33. Robinson, P. (2010). Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Putz and L. Sicola (eds), Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition: Inside the Learner’s Mind (pp. 243-69). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
34. Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 3-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Robinson, P. and Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 161-76.
36. Samuda, V. and Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in Second Language Learning. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
38. Shekary, M. and Tahririan, M. H. (2006). Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 557-73.
39. Skehan, P., and Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-58.
41. Smith, B. (2008). The relationship between scrolling, negotiation and self-initiated self-repair in an SCMC environment. CALICO Journal, 26, 231-45.
42. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-37.
43. Tudini, V. (2007). Negotiation and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 577-601.
44. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
45. Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-based Learning. Harlow, UK: Longman.
46. Yilmaz, Y. and Yuksel, D. (2011). Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study. Language Teaching Research, 15, 457-77.