The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 689-725

  Baralt, Melissa ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887030668     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263113000429     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ayoun, D. (2004). The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. Modern Language Journal, 88, 31-55
2. Beauvois, M. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-464
3. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 120-136
4. Block, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134, 330-343
5. Chapelle, C. (1998). Analysis of interaction sequences in computer-assisted language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 753-757
6. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. New York : Cambridge University Press
7. Collentine, J. (2010). The acquisition and teaching of the Spanish subjunctive: An update on current fi ndings. Hispania, 93, 39-51
8. de la Fuente, M. J. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 47-81
9. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
10. Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford : Blackwell
11. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York : Cambridge University Press
12. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59, 90-125
13. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford : Oxford University Press
14. Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19, 279-294
15. Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2001). Speed of information processing, psychometric intelligence, and time estimation as an index of cognitive load. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1009-1021
16. Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Llanes, À. (2009). Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners? interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 367-395
17. Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445-474
18. Ishikawa, T. (2007). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the (+/? here-and-now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136-156). Bristol, UK : Multilingual Matters
19. Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37, 254-268
20. Kim, Y. (2012). Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learners? question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 627-658
21. Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2011). Task complexity, language anxiety, and the development of the simple past. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 287-306). Amsterdam : Benjamins
22. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 261-284
23. Lai, C., Fei, F., & Roots, R. (2008). The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal, 26, 70-90
24. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing in text-based online chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 102-120
25. Lamy, M.-N., & Hampel, R. (2007). Online communication in language teaching and learning. Basingstoke, UK : Palgrave Macmillan
26. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fl uency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of fi ve Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590-619
27. Lee, L. (2001). Online interaction: Negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish. ReCALL, 13, 232-244
28. Long, M. H. (2000). Second language acquisition theories. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 527-534). London : Routledge
29. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum
30. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York : Cambridge University Press
31. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66
32. Mackey, A. (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition. Oxford : Oxford University Press
33. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720
34. Michel, M. (2011). Cognitive and interactive aspects of task-based performance in Dutch as a second language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
35. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758
36. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555-578
37. Nuevo, A. (2006). Task complexity and interaction: L2 learning opportunities and interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
38. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63-71
39. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). New York : Cambridge University Press
40. Pérez-Leroux, A. (2001). Subjunctive mood in Spanish child relatives: At the interface of linguistic and cognitive development. In K. Nelson, A. Aksu-Koç, & C. Johnson (Eds.), Children?s language (pp. 69-93). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum
41. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on "noticing the gap": Nonnative speakers? noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126
42. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437-470
43. Révész, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. Modern Language Journal, 95, 168-181
44. Robinson, P. (2001 a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task infl uences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). New York : Cambridge University Press
45. Robinson, P. (2001 b). Task complexity, task diffi culty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57
46. Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, and perceptions of task diffi culty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 191-213
47. Robinson, P. (2010). Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Putz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Inside the learner mind: Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 239-264). Amsterdam : Benjamins
48. Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3-38). Amsterdam : Benjamins
49. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 161-176
50. Sachs, R., & Suh, B.-R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford : Oxford University Press
51. Salaberry, R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 5-27
52. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke, UK : Palgrave Macmillan
53. Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 96-120
54. Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010). Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics, 31, 554-577
55. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158
56. Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fl uency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510-532
57. Smith, B. (2005). The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 33-58
58. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337
59. Trofi movich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytic ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 171-195). Oxford : Oxford University Press.