The e-Learning Reader

The e-Learning Reader

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-351

  De Freitas, Sara ^a   Jameson, Jill ^b  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85191231890     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (190)

1. Agger, B. (2004), The Virtual Self: A Contemporary Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Aldrich, C. (2005), ‘Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games and Pedagogy’. In C. Aldrich, e-Learning and other Educational Experiences. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
3. Boud, D., Cohen, R., and Walker, D. (eds) (1993), Using Experience for Learning. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
4. Boud, D., Cohen, R., and Walker, D. (eds) (1986), Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bruner, J. (1983), Play, Thought, and Language. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
6. Bruner, J., Jolly, A. And Sylva, K. (1976), Play - its Role in Development and Evolution. New York: Basic Books.
7. Buckingham, D. ed. (2008), MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning, Youth, Identity and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
8. Bybee, R.W. And Sund, R. B. (1982), Piaget for Educators. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997), ‘Happiness and Creativity: Going with the Flow’. The Futurist, 31 (5).
10. de Freitas, S. And Oliver, M. (2006), ‘How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated?’ Computers and Education, 46 (3): 249-264.
11. de Freitas, S. And Maharg, P. (eds) (2011), Digital Games and Learning. London and New York: Continuum.
12. del Val, J. (2006), ‘Situated Tékhne beyond the Performative: Metaformative Bodies and the Politics of Technology in Post-postmodernism’. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 2 (2): 187-208.
13. Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
14. Dewey, J. (1933), How We Think (2nd edition). New York: D. C. Heath.
15. Dewey, J. (1938), Experience and Education. London: Macmillan.
16. Englestrom, Y., Miettinen, R. And Punamaki, R. L. (1999), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Garvey, C. (1990), Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Gee, J. P. (2003), What Video Games have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. Hughes, G. And Scott, C. (2005), ‘No pain no gain: use of an online game to explore issues of online identity and the implications for collaborative e-Learning’. E-Learning, 2 (4): 388-401.
20. Huizinga, J. (1950), Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. New York: Roy Publishers.
21. Jarvis, P. (1995), Adult and Continuing Education: Theory and Practice (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
22. Jenkins, H. (2006), Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
23. Kane, P. (2004), The Play Ethic. Basingstoke and Oxford: Macmillan.
24. Kayes, C. D. (2002), ‘Experiential learning and its critics: preserving the role of experience in management learning and education’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1 (2): 137-149.
25. Kolb, A. Y. And Kolb, D. A. (2005), ‘Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4 (2): 193-212.
26. Kolb, A. Y. And Kolb, D. A. (2010), Learning to play, playing to learn: A case study of a ludic learning space. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23 (1): 26-50.
27. Kress, G. (2003), Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
28. Maslow, A. H. (1970), Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
29. Michael, D. And Chen, S. (2006), Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train and Inform. Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology.
30. Oliver, M and Carr, D. (2009), ‘Learning in virtual worlds: using communities of practice to explain how people learn from play’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (3): 444-457.
31. Piaget, J. (1962), Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. Oxford: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
32. Ally, M. (2004), ‘Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning’. In T. Anderson and F. Elloumi (eds) Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University, 3-31.
33. Barnes K., Marateo R. And Pixy Ferris S. (2007), ‘Teaching and learning with the Net Generation’. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 3. Available at: http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol3_issue4/Teaching_and_Learning_with_the_Net_Generation.pdf (accessed 16 Aug 2011).
34. Bayne S. And Ross J. (2007), ‘The “digital native” and “digital immigrant”: A dangerous opposition’. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education, Liverpool, UK, 9-11 December, 2007. Available at: http://www.malts.ed.ac.uk/staff/sian/natives_final.pdf (accessed 16 Aug 2011).
35. Beniger J. (1986), The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Bennett S., Maton K. And Kervin, L. (2008), ‘The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39: 775-786.
37. Bennett, S. And Maton, K. (2010), ‘Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26: 321-329.
38. Bernstein B. (1999), ‘Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20: 157-173.
39. Bourdieu P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.
40. Bourdieu P. And Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
41. Bransford, J., A. Brown, et al. (2000), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Castells M. (2001), The Internet Galaxy. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Chaiklin, S. (2003), ‘The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of Learning and Instruction’. In A. Kozulin ed., Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39-64.
44. Clark W., Logan K., Luckin R., Mee, A. And Oliver, M. (2008), ‘Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25: 56-69.
45. Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience (2009), ‘Higher Education in aWeb 2.0 World. Report of an independent Committee of Inquiry into the impact on higher education of students’ widespread use of Web 2.0 technologies’. Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/heweb20rptv1.pdf (accessed 16 Aug 2011).
46. Conole, G. (2004), E-Learning: The Hype and the Reality. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 12, Sept. 2004. (Designing and Developing for the Disciplines Special Issue). Available at: http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/article/2004-12/212. Date accessed: 05 Mar. 2012.
47. Dede, C. (2008), ‘Theoretical Perspectives Influencing the Use of Information Technology in Teaching and Learning’. In J. Voogt and G. Knezek, International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. New York: Springer, 43-59.
48. Facer K. And Furlong R. (2001), ‘Beyond the myth of the “cyberkid”: young people at the margins of the information revolution’. Journal of Youth Studies, 4: 451-469.
49. Furlong J., Furlong K., Facer K. And Sutherland S. (2000), The national grid for learning: A curriculum without walls? Cambridge Journal of Education, 30: 91-110.
50. Golding P. (2000), ‘Forthcoming features: information and communication technologies and the sociology of the future’. Sociology, 34: 165-184.
51. Laurillard, D. (2002), Rethinking University Teaching: A framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Oxford: Taylor & Francis Group.
52. Levykh, M. G. (2008), ‘The affective establishment and maintenance of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development’. Educational Theory, 58: 83-101.
53. Knowles, M. S. (1975), Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Cambridge: Prentice Hall.
54. Kop, R. And Hill, A. (2008), ‘Connectivism: learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?’ The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3): Article 9.3.4. Available at: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103 (accessed 5 Jul 2011).
55. Maslow, A. (1968), Towards a Psychology of Being (2nd edition). New York: Van Nostrand.
56. Merriam, S. And Caffarella, R. S. (1991, 1998), Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57. Mezirow, J. (1991), Transformative Dimensions of Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58. Miller, P. (1993), Theories of Developmental Psychology (3rd edition). New York. W. H. Freeman.
59. Newman, F. And Holzman, L. (1997), The End of Knowing. A New Developmental Way of Learning. London: Routledge.
60. Papert, S. (1980), Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
61. Papert, S. And Harel, I. (1991), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62. Piaget, J. (1929), The Child’s Conception of the World. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
63. Prensky, M. (2001), ‘Digital natives, digital immigrants’. On the Horizon, 9: 1-6.
64. Prensky, M. (2009), ‘H. Sapiens digital: from digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom’. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 5 (3): Feb/March 2009. Available at: http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol5_issue3/H._Sapiens_Digital-__From_Digital_Immigrants_and_Digital_Natives_to_Digital_Wisdom.pdf (accessed 16 Aug 2011).
65. Rogers, C. And Freiberg, H. J. (1993), Freedom to Learn (3rd edition). New York: Merrill.
66. Rousseau, J. (1762), Emile. New York: Basic Books.
67. Selwyn, N., Gorard, S. And Furlong, J. (2006), Adults’ use of information technology for self-education. Studies in the Education of Adults, 38 (2): 141-159.
68. Solomon, G. ed. (1996), Distributed Cognitions. Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Tennant, M. (1988-1997), Psychology and Adult Learning. London: Routledge.
70. Vaughan, M., Brighouse, T., Neill, A.S., Readhead, Z. And Stronach, I. (eds) (2006), Summerhill and AS Neill. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
71. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962), Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Wertsch, J. V. (1985), Cultural, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Anderson, L. W. (2005), ‘Objectives, evaluation, and the study of education’. Studies in Educational Evaluation 31: 102-113.
74. Ausubel, David P. (1977), ‘The facilitation of meaningful verbal learning in the classroom’. Educational Psychologist, 12 (2): 162-178.
75. Dick, W. And Carey, L. (1990), The Systematic Design of Instruction. New York: HarperCollins.
76. Edelman, G. (1992), Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
77. Gagné, R. M. (1984), ‘Learning Outcomes and Their Effects: Useful Categories of Human Performance’. American Psychologist, 39 (4): 377-385.
78. Gagné, R. M. (1985), The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
79. Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M. And Russell, J. D. (2005), ‘Principles of instructional design’. Performance Improvement, 44: 44-46.
80. Glaser, R. (1990), ‘The re-emergence of learning theory within instructional research’. American Psychologist, 45(1): 29-39.
81. Gur, B. S. And Wiley, D. A. (2009), ‘Psychologism and instructional technology’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41 (3).
82. Jones, M. K., Li, Z. And Merill, M. D. (1990), ‘Domain knowledge representation for instructional analysis’. Educational Technology, 30 (10): 7-32.
83. Leshin, C. B., Pollock, J. And Reigeluth, C. (1994), Instructional Design Strategies and Tactics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
84. Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J. And the ID2 Research Group (1996), ‘Reclaiming Instructional Design’. Educational Technology, 36 (5): 5-7.
85. Merrill, P. F. (1976), ‘Task analysis: An information processing approach’. NSPI Journal, 15(2): 7-11.
86. Paterson, C. H. (1977), Foundations for a Theory of Instruction. New York: Harper & Row.
87. Reigeluth, C. (1992), ‘Elaborating the elaboration theory’. Educational Technology Research & Development, 40 (3): 80-86.
88. Reigeluth, C. (1999), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
89. Reigeluth, C. And Garfinkle, R. J. (eds) Systemic Change in Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
90. Rossett, A. (1987), Training Needs Assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
91. Skinner, B. F. (1950), ‘Are theories of learning necessary?’ The Psychological Review, 54 (4): 193-216.
92. Snelbecker, G. E. (1983), Learning Theory, Instructional Theory and Psychoeducational Design. New York: McGraw Hill.
93. Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P.A. And Kester, L. (2003), ‘Taking the load off a learner’s mind: instructional design for complex learning’. Educational Psychologist, 38 (1): 5-13.
94. Wilson, B. G. ed. (1996), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Mahwah, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
95. Winn, W. (1993), ‘Instructional design and situated learning: paradox or partnership?’ Educational Technology, 33 (3): 16-21.
96. Yerkes, R. M. And Dodson, J. D. (1908), ‘The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation’. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 18, 459-482.
97. Young, M. F. (1993), ‘Instructional design for situated learning’. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41 (1): 43-58.
98. Anderson, J. (1983), The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
99. Anderson, J., Boyle, C., Farrell, R. And Reiser, B. (1987), ‘Cognitive Principles in the Design of Computer Tutors’. P. Morris ed., Modeling Cognition. New York: John Wiley.
100. Berners-Lee, T. (1997), ‘World-wide computer: The human connection’. Communications of the ACM, 40 (2): 57-58.
101. Bransford, J. D. et al. (1990), ‘Anchored Instruction: Why We Need It and How Technology Can Help’. In D. Nix and R. Sprio (eds), Cognition, Education and Multimedia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
102. Bransford, J. D., Cocking, R. R., and Brown, A. L. (2000), ‘Technology to Support Learning’. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 206-230.
103. Bransford, J. D. And Stein, B. S. (1993), The Ideal Problem Solver (2nd edition). New York: Freeman.
104. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P. (1989), ‘Situated cognition and the culture of learning’. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-42.
105. Bruner, J. (1990), Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
106. Bush, V. (1945), ‘As We May Think’. Atlantic Magazine, 1 (12).
107. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (March 1993), ‘Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited’. Educational Technology, 33 (3): 52-70.
108. Conklin, J. (1987), ‘Hypertext: An introduction and survey’. Computer, 20 (9): 17-41.
109. Conole, G, and Alevizou, P. (2010), A Literature Review of the Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Higher Education. HE Academy commissioned report. Available at: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/EvidenceNet/Conole_Alevizou_2010.pdf (accessed 16 Aug 2011).
110. Gibbons, A. S. And Brewer, E. K. (2005), ‘Elementary Principles of Design Languages and Design Notation Systems for Instructional Design’. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack and D. A. Wiley (eds), Innovations in Instructional Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 111-129.
111. Gibson, C. C. (1998), ‘Speaking Personally - with David H. Jonassen’. American Journal of Distance Education, 12 (1): 68-75.
112. Gilbert, L. S. (1999), ‘Where is my Brain? Distributed Cognition, Activity Theory, and Cognitive Tools’ (Working Paper). Houston, TX: Association for Educational Communications and Technologies (AECT) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED436153).
113. Goldman, A. (1986), Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
114. Iiyoshi, T., Hannifin, M. J., and Wang, F. (2005), ‘Cognitive tools and student-centered learning: rethinking tools, functions, and applications’. Educational Media International, 42: 281-296.
115. Jenkins, H., with Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, A. J. And Weigel, M. (2006), Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
116. Joint, N. (2011), ‘If Google makes you stupid, what should librarians do about it?’ Library Review, 60 (4): 268-278.
117. Jonassen, D. H. (1994), ‘Technology as Cognitive Tools: Learners as Designers’. AECT ITForum Archives.
118. Jonassen, D. H. (1994), Technology as Cognitive Tools: Learners as Designers (IT Forum Paper 1). Message posted to http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper1/paper1.html.
119. Jonassen, D. H. (1996), Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
120. Jonassen, D. H. And Carr, C. (2000), ‘Mind Tools: Affording Multiple Knowledge Representations in Learning’. In S. P. Lajoie ed. Computers as Cognitive Tools: Volume ii, No More Walls. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 165-196.
121. Jonasssen, D. H. And Reeves, T. C. (1996), ‘Learning with Technology: Using Computers as Cognitive Tools’. In D. H. Jonassen ed. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technologies. New York: Prentice Hall International, 693-719.
122. Jonassen, D., M. Davidson, M. Collins, J. Campbell, and B. B. Haag (1995) ‘Constructivism and computer-mediated communications in distance education’. The American Journal of Distance Education 9 (2): 7-26.
123. Kennedy, D. And McNaught, C. (2001), Computer-Based Cognitive Tools: Description and Design (C. Vitelli, & J. Vitelli, (eds)). Norfolk, Virginia: Ed Media.
124. Kommers, P. A. M., Jonassen, D. H. And Mayes, T. M. (eds) (1992), Cognitive Tools for Learning (Vol. 81 NATO ASI series). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
125. Lajoie, S. P. (2000), Computers as Cognitive Tools: Volume II, No More Walls (revised edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
126. Lave, J. (1988), Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
127. McLellan, H. (1995), Situated Learning Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
128. Mishra, P. And Koehler, M. (2006), ‘Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge’. Teachers College Record, 108 (6): 1017-1054.
129. Nuutinen, J., Sutinen, E., Botha, A., and Kommers, P. (2010), ‘From mindtools to social mindtools: Collaborative writing with woven stories’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41 (5): 753-775.
130. Pea, R. D. (1985), ‘Beyond amplification: using the computer to reorganize mental functioning’. Educational Psychologist, 20 (4): 167-182.
131. Ritter, S., Anderson, J., Koendinger, K. And Corbett, A. (2007), ‘Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14 (2): 249-255. Available online at http://bit.ly/mRphy2.
132. Salomon, G. ed. (1993), Distributed Cognitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., and Globerson T. (1991), ‘Partners in cognition: extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies’. Educational Researcher, 20 (4): 2-9.
134. Scardamalia, M. And Bereiter, C. (1994), ‘Computer support for knowledge-building communities’. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (3): 265-283.
135. Sewell, D. F. (1990), New Tools for New Minds. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
136. Shulman, L. S. (1986), ‘Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching’. Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4-14.
137. Siemens, G. (2005), ‘Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age’. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2 (1).
138. Siemens, G. (12 November 2006), Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime for the Self-Amused. Available at: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm (accessed 4 Jul 2011).
139. Siemens, G. (2006), Knowing Knowledge, online at Lulu.com.
140. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J. And Coulson, R. L. (1992), ‘Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains’. In T. Duffy and D. Jonassen (eds), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
141. Spiro, R. J. And Jehng, J. (1990), ‘Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext: Theory and Technology for the Non-Linear and Multidimensional Traversal of Complex Subject Matter’. In D. Nix and R. Spiro (eds), Cognition, Education, and Multimedia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
142. Steffe, L. And J. Gale (1995), Constructivism in Education. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
143. Suchman, L. (1988), Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human/Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
144. Sweller, J. (1988), ‘Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning’. Cognitive Science, 12: 257-285.
145. Sweller, J. (1999), Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
146. Walter, J. O. (2002), Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge, 78.
147. Witkin, H. And Goodenough, D. (1981), Cognitive Styles, Essence and Origins: Field Dependence and Field Independence. New York: International Universities Press.
148. Bandura, A. (1993), ‘Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning’. Educational Psychologist, 28 (2): 117-148.
149. Bedny, G. Z. & Meister, D. (1997). The Russian Theory of Activity: Current Applications to Design and Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
150. Bell, F. (2010), ‘Connectivism: its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning’. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12 (3): 98-118.
151. Bennett, S., Maton, K. And Kervin, L. (2008), ‘The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5): 775-786.
152. Biggart, N. W. ed., Readings in Economic Sociology. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
153. Brown, J. S., and Adler, R. P. (2008), ‘Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0.’ Available online at: http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume43/MindsonFireOpenEducationtheLon/162420.
154. Carr, D. (2010), Constructing disability in online worlds: Conceptualising disability in online research. London Review of Education, 8 (1): 51-61.
155. Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon, T and Darby, J. (2007), ‘“Disruptive technologies”, “pedagogical innovation”: what’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology’. Computers and Education, 50 (2): 511-524.
156. Davies, J. And Merchant, G. (2009), Web 2.0 for Schools: Learning and Social Participation. New York: Peter Lang.
157. Eisenstadt, M. And Vincent, T. (2000), The Knowledge Web: Learning and Collaborating on the Net. London: Kogan Page.
158. Freire, P. (1973), Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Continuum.
159. Ellis, R. And Goodyear, P. (2009), Students’ Experiences of e-Learning in Higher Education: The Ecology of Sustainable Innovation. New York: Routledge Falmer.
160. Hara, N. And Kling, R. (2000), ‘Students’ distress with a web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants’ experiences’. Information, Communication & Society, 3 (4): 557-579.
161. Herring, S. (2000), ‘Gender differences in CMC: findings and implications’. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, 18 (1). Available at: http://cpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring/ (accessed 5 Jul 2011).
162. Howe, N. And Strauss, W. (2000), Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Books.
163. Jameson, J. (2008), ‘Leadership: Professional Communities of Leadership Practice in Post-Compulsory Education’. Invited Research Report for ESCalate Discussions in Education Series: ESCalate HEA Subject Centre, Stirling University. Available at: http://escalate.ac.uk/downloads/5130.pdf (accessed 5 March 2012).
164. Jameson, J. (2009), ‘Distributed Leadership, Trust and Online Communities’. In A. A. Ozok and P. Zaphiris (eds), Online Communities and Social Computing: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 5621/2009. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 226-235.
165. Jameson, J. (2010a), ‘An e-Learning Metaphor: The CAMEL Nomadic Community of Practice’. Invited chapter in Drs Siran Mukerji and Purnendu Tripathi (eds), Cases on Technology Enhanced Learning through Collaborative Opportunities. New York: IGI-Global (USA).
166. Jameson, J. (2011), ‘Growing a Community of Practice: A Case Study of the eLIDA CAMEL’. In Eduardo Bueno Campos, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, and Olga Rivera Hernáez (eds), Handbook of Research on Communities of Practice for Organizational Management and Networking: Methodologies for Competitive Advantage. New York: IGI-Global.
167. Jameson, J., Ferrell, G., Kelly, J., Walker, S. And Ryan, M. (2006), ‘Building trust and shared knowledge in communities of e-Learning practice: Collaborative leadership in the JISC eLISA and CAMEL lifelong learning projects’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37: 949-967.
168. Johnson, D. And Johnson, R. (1991), Learning Together and Learning Alone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
169. Jones, C. (1999), ‘From the sage on the stage to what exactly? Description and the place of the moderator in cooperative and collaborative learning’. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 7 (2): 27-36.
170. Kukulska-Hulme, A. And Traxler, J. (eds) (2005), Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers. London: Routledge.
171. Lankshear, C. And Knobel, N. (eds) (2008), Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York, Berlin, Oxford: Open University Press.
172. Lave, J. And Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
173. Lowenthal, P. R. (2009), ‘Social presence’. In Rogers, P., Berg, G., Boettcher, J., Howard, C., Justice, L. And Schenk, K. (eds), Encyclopedia of Distance and Online Learning (2nd edition, 1900-1906). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Available at: http://www.patricklowenthal.com/publications/socialpresenceEDOLpre-print.pdf (accessed 5 July 2011).
174. McConnell, D. (2000), Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning. London: Kogan Page.
175. Mason, R and Rennie, F. (2008), e-Learning and Social Networking Handbook: Resources for Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
176. Oblinger, D. And Oblinger, J. (2005), ‘Is it Age or IT: First Steps Towards Understanding the Net Generation’. In D. Oblinger and J. Oblinger (eds), Educating the Net Generation. Washington, DC: Educause. Available online at www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/.
177. Palloff, R. M. And Pratt, K. (2005), Collaborating Online: Learning Together in Community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
178. Salomon, G. (1992), ‘What does the design of effective CSCL require?’ ACM SIGCUE Outlook - Special issue on computer supported collaborative learning, 21 (3): 62-68.
179. Salomon, G. (1997), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press.
180. Salomon, G. e-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Routledge.
181. Sharpe, R., Beetham, H. And de Freitas, S. (eds) (2010), Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: How Learners are Shaping their Own Experiences. London and New York: Routledge.
182. Sheehy, K., Ferguson, R. And Clough, G. (2009), ‘Learning in the panopticon: ethical and social issues in building a virtual educational environment’. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2 (2): 89-96.
183. Singh, J. P. (2008), ‘Paulo Freire: possibilities for dialogic communication in a market-driven information age’. Information, Communication & Society, 11 (5): 699-726.
184. Slevin, J. (2008), ‘E-Learning and the transformation of social interaction in higher education’, Learning, Media and Technology, 33 (2): 115-126.
185. Smith, R. O. (2008), ‘The Paradox of Trust in Online Collaborative Groups’. Distance Education, 29 (3): 325-340.
186. Steeples, C. And Jones, C. (eds) (2001), Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. London: Springer.
187. Suppes, P. & C. Stillinger. (1999), ‘Individual differences in gifted students’ progress through computer-based algebra and pre-calculus courses’. Available at: http://epgy.stanford.edu
188. Tapscott, D. (1998), Growing up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
189. Thorpe, M. (2001), ‘From Independent Learning to Collaborative Learning: New Communities of Practice in Open, Distance and Distributed Learning’. In M. Lea and K. Nicoll (eds), Distributed Learning: Social and Cultural Approaches to Practice. London: Routledge, 131-151.
190. Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.