First encounters with the automated vehicle: Development and evaluation of a tutorial concept to support users of partial and conditional driving automation

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 97, Issue , 2023, Pages 1-16

  Feinauer, Sophie ^a   Voskort, Stefanie ^b   Groh, Irene ^c   Petzoldt, Tibor ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c AUDI AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

4C ID; Acceptance; Automated driving; Mental model; Trust

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; VEHICLES;

4C/ID; ACCEPTANCE; AUTOMATED DRIVE; AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; DRIVING FUNCTIONS; MENTAL MODEL; TRUST; USER EDUCATION; VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85164234880     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2023.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [programming language]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/, 2020.
2. Abraham, H., Reimer, B., Seppelt, B., Fitzgerald, C., Mehler, B., Coughlin, J.F., Consumer interest in automation: Preliminary observations exploring a year's change: White paper. 2017, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3. Anderson, J.R., A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22:3 (1983), 261–295, 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3.
4. Baumann, M., Krems, J., Situation awareness and driving: A cognitive model. Cacciabue, C., (eds.) Modelling driver behaviour in automotive environments, 2007, Springer, London, 253–265.
5. Beggiato, M., Krems, J., The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 18 (2013), 47–57, 10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006.
6. Beggiato, M., Pereira, M., Petzoldt, T., Krems, J., Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC: A longitudinal on-road study. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 35 (2015), 75–84, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.005.
7. Blömacher, K., Nöcker, G., Huff, M., The role of system description for conditionally automated vehicles. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 54 (2018), 159–170, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.010.
8. Boelhouwer, A., van den Beukel, A.P., van der Voort, M.C., Martens, M.H., Should I take over? Does system knowledge help drivers in making take-over decisions while driving a partially automated car?. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 60 (2019), 669–684, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.016.
9. Boos, A., Emmermann, B., Biebl, B., Feldhütter, A., Fröhlich, M., Bengler, K., Information depth in a video tutorial on the intended use of automated driving. Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I., (eds.) Proceedings of the 21st congress of the international ergonomics association (IEA 2021), vol. 221, 2021, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 575–582, 10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_70.
10. Carroll, J.M., Olson, J.R., Mental models in human-computer interaction: Research issues about what the user of software knows: Workshop on software human factors: Users' mental models (Washington, district of Columbia). 1987.
11. Casner, S.M., Hutchins, E.L., What do we tell the drivers? Toward minimum driver training standards for partially automated cars. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 13:2 (2019), 55–66, 10.1177/1555343419830901.
12. Chan, C.-Y., Advancements, prospects, and impacts of automated driving systems. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 6:3 (2017), 208–216, 10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.07.008.
13. Costa, J.M., Miranda, G.L., Melo, M., Four-component instructional design (4C/ID) model: A meta-analysis on use and effect. Learning Environments Research 54 (2021), 445–463, 10.1007/s10984-021-09373-y.
14. Durso, F., Gronlund, S.D., Situation awareness. Durso, F., Nickerson, R., Schvaneveldt, R., Dumais, S., Lindsay, D., Chi, M., (eds.) Handbook of applied cognition, 1999, Wiley, 283–314.
15. Ebnali, M., Hulme, K., Ebnali-Heidari, A., Mazloumi, A., How does training effect users' attitudes and skills needed for highly automated driving?. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 66 (2019), 184–195, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.001.
16. Ebnali, M., Lamb, R., Fathi, R., Hulme, K., Virtual reality tour for first-time users of highly automated cars: Comparing the effects of virtual environments with different levels of interaction fidelity. Applied Ergonomics, 90, 2021, 103226, 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103226.
17. Endsley, M.R., Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. Endsley, M.R., Garland, D.J., (eds.) Situation awareness analysis and measurement, vol. 1, 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 3–29.
18. Feinauer, S., Groh, I., Petzoldt, T., Driver instruction for automated vehicles: Assessing the role of specific elements on learner motivation and mental model development. Plant, K.L., Preatorius, G., (eds.) Human factors in transportation, 2022, AHFE International, New York, New York, USA, 492–500, 10.54941/ahfe1002482.
19. Feinauer, S., Schuller, L., Groh, I., Huestegge, L., Petzoldt, T., The potential of gamification for user education of partial and conditional driving automation: A driving simulator study. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 90 (2022), 252–268, 10.1016/j.trf.2022.08.009.
20. Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., Beggiato, M., Krems, J., Keinath, A., Learning to use automation: Behavioral changes in interaction with automated driving systems. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 62 (2019), 599–614, 10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.013.
21. Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., Krems, J., Keinath, A., User education in automated driving: Owner's manual and interactive tutorial support mental model formation and human-automation interaction. Information, 10(4), 2019, 143, 10.3390/info10040143.
22. Gaspar, J., Carney, C., Shull, E., Horrey, W.J., The impact of driver's mental models of advanced vehicle technologies on safety and performance. (Tech. Rep.), 2020, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC.
23. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Bengler, K., Lorenz, L., Partially automated driving as a fallback level of high automation. 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme, 2013.
24. Harbluk, J.L., Noy, Y.I., Trbovich, P.L., Eizenman, M., An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39:2 (2007), 372–379.
25. Hilz, J., Malone, S., Brünken, R., Different learning conditions and their impact on hazard perception training. Stanton, N., (eds.) Advances in human aspects of transportation, vol. 597, 2018, Springer, Cham, 282–288, 10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_28.
26. Hoff, K.A., Bashir, M., Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors 57:3 (2015), 407–434, 10.1177/0018720814547570.
27. Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G., Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4:1 (2000), 53–71, 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04.
28. Kester, L., Kirschner, P.A., van Merriënboer, J.J., Baumer, A., Just-in-time information presentation and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior 17:4 (2001), 373–391, 10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00011-5.
29. Koo, T.K., Li, M.Y., A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15:2 (2016), 155–163, 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
30. Kraiger, K., Ford, J.K., Salas, E., Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 78:2 (1993), 311–328, 10.1037//0021-9010.78.2.311.
31. Krampell, M., Solís-Marcos, I., Hjälmdahl, M., Driving automation state-of-mind: Using training to instigate rapid mental model development. Applied Ergonomics, 83, 2020, 102986, 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102986.
32. Kraus, J., Scholz, D., Stiegemeier, D., Baumann, M., The more you know: Trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency. Human Factors 62:5 (2020), 718–736, 10.1177/0018720819853686.
33. Kurpiers, C., Biebl, B., Mejia Hernandez, J., Raisch, F., Mode awareness and automated driving—what is it and how can it be measured?. Information, 11(5), 2020, 277, 10.3390/info11050277.
34. Kyriakidis, M., de Winter, J.C.F., Stanton, N., Bellet, T., van Arem, B., Brookhuis, K., Happee, R., A human factors perspective on automated driving. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 20:3 (2019), 223–249, 10.1080/1463922X.2017.1293187.
35. Lee, J.D., See, K.A., Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46:1 (2004), 50–80, 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392.
36. Manchon, J.B., Bueno, M., Navarro, J., From manual to automated driving: How does trust evolve?. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 22:5 (2021), 528–554, 10.1080/1463922X.2020.1830450.
37. Manser, M., Noble, A.M., Machiani, S.G., Shortz, A.E., Klauer, S.G., Higgins, L., Ahmadi, A., Driver training research and guidelines for automated vehicle technology. (Tech. Rep. No. 01-004), 2019, Safe-D National UTC Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10919/95178.
38. McDonald, A., Carney, C., McGehee, D., Vehicle owners' experiences with and reactions to advanced driver assistance systems. (Tech. Rep.), 2018, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC.
39. Mehlenbacher, B., Wogalter, M.S., Laughery, K.R., On the reading of product owner's manuals: Perceptions and product complexity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 46:6 (2002), 730–734, 10.1177/154193120204600610.
40. Merrill, M.D., First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 50:3 (2002), 43–59, 10.1007/BF02505024.
41. Merriman, S.E., Plant, K.L., Revell, K.M., Stanton, N.A., Challenges for automated vehicle driver training: A thematic analysis from manual and automated driving. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 76 (2021), 238–268, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.10.011.
42. Naujoks, F., Wiedemann, K., Schömig, N., Jarosch, O., Gold, C., Expert-based controllability assessment of control transitions from automated to manual driving. MethodsX 5 (2018), 579–592, 10.1016/j.mex.2018.05.007.
43. Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Wiedemann, K., Marberger, C., Noncritical state transitions during conditionally automated driving on German freeways: Effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover time and takeover quality. Human Factors 61:4 (2019), 596–613, 10.1177/0018720818824002.
44. Neuhuber, N., Ebinger, N., Pretto, P., Kubicek, B., How am I supposed to know? Conceptualization and first evaluation of a driver tutoring system for automated driving. de Waard, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society Europe Chapter 2022 annual conference, 2022 Retrieved from http://hfes-europe.org.
45. Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Tichon, J., Briant, O., Is a flick-through enough? A content analysis of advanced driver assistance systems (adas) user manuals. PLoS ONE 16:6 (2021), 1–17, 10.1371/journal.pone.0252688.
46. Pöhler, G., Heine, T., Deml, B., Itemanalyse und Faktorstruktur eines Fragebogens zur Messung von Vertrauen im Umgang mit automatischen Systemen. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 70:3 (2016), 151–160.
47. Rauch, N., Ein verhaltensbasiertes Messmodell zur Erfassung von Situationsbewusstsein im Fahrkontext. (Doctoral Disseration, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg), 2009 Retrieved from urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-37225.
48. SAE, Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. (No. J3016R), 2018, SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 10.4271/J3016_201806.
49. Sarter, N., Woods, D., How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors 37:1 (1995), 5–19, 10.1518/001872095779049516.
50. Sarter, N., Woods, D., Billings, C.E., Automation surprises. Salvendy, G., (eds.) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 1997, Wiley, New York, NY, 1926–1943.
51. Schmid, D., The technology acceptance scale: Its Bayesian psychometrics assessed in a factor analysis via Markov chain Monte Carlo models. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 32:1 (2022), 66–88, 10.1002/hfm.20896.
52. Seel, N.M., Model-centered learning and instruction. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning 1 (2003), 59–85.
53. Shrout, P.E., Fleiss, J.L., Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86:2 (1979), 420–428, 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
54. Simon, J.H., Learning to drive with advanced driver assistance systems. Empirical studies of an online tutor and a personalised warning display on the effects of learnability and the acquisition of skill. (Doctoral dissertation. Technische Universität Chemnitz), 2005 Retrieved from nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:swb:ch1-200600713.
55. Sportillo, D., Paljic, A., Ojeda, L., Get ready for automated driving using virtual reality. Accident Analysis and Prevention 118 (2018), 102–113, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.003.
56. van der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., de Waard, D., A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research. Part C, Emerging Technologies 5:1 (1997), 1–10, 10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3.
57. van Merriënboer, J.J., Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. 1997, Educational Technology Publications.
58. van Merriënboer, J.J., Jelsma, O., Paas, F.G., Training for reflective expertise: A four-component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills. Educational Technology Research and Development 40:2 (1992), 23–43.
59. van Merriënboer, J.J., Clark, R.E., de Croock, M.B.M., Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development 50:2 (2002), 39–61.
60. van Merriënboer, J.J., Kirschner, P.A., Kester, L., Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist 38:1 (2003), 5–13, 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2.
61. Victor, T., Tivesten, E., Gustavsson, P., Johansson, J., Sangberg, F., Ljung Aust, M., Automation expectation mismatch: Incorrect prediction despite eyes on threat and hands on wheel. Human Factors 60:8 (2018), 1095–1116, 10.1177/0018720818788164.
62. Wright, R.A., Refining the prediction of effort: Brehm's distinction between potential motivation and motivation intensity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2:2 (2008), 682–701, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00093.x.
63. Zoellick, J.C., Kuhlmey, A., Schenk, L., Schindel, D., Blüher, S., Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment. PLoS ONE, 14(5), 2019, e0215969, 10.1371/journal.pone.0215969.