Situation awareness and driving: A cognitive model

Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments: Critical Issues in Driver Interactions with Intelligent Transport Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 253-265

  Baumann, M ^a   Krems, J F ^a  

^a CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890164895     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_14     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Adams, M. J., Tenney, Y. J. and Pew, R. W. (1995). Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 85-104.
2. Bailly, B., Bellet, T. and Goupil, C. (2003). Driver's mental representations: Experimental study and training perspectives. In L. Dorn (Ed.). Driver behavior and training. Aldershot, UK, Ashgate.
3. Baumann, M., Rösier, D., Jahn, G. and Krems, J. F. (2003). Assessing driver distraction using occlusion method and peripheral detection task. In H. Strasser, K. Kluth, H. Rausch and H. Bubb (Eds.) Quality of work and products in enterprises of the future. Ergonomia Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 53-56.
4. Breuer, J., Bengler, K., Heinrich, C. and Reichelt, W. (2003). Development of advanced driver attention metrics (ADAM). In H. Strasser, K. Kluth, H. Rausch and H. Bubb (Eds.). Quality of work and products in enterprises of the future. Ergonomia Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 37-39.
5. Chapman, PR. and Underwood, G. (1998). Visual search of driving situations: Danger and experience. Perception, 27(8), 951-964.
6. Dawson, M. R. W. (1998). Understanding cognitive science. Blackwell, Malden.
7. Endsley, M. R. (1995a). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 65-84.
8. Endsley, M. R. (1995b). Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
9. European Commission (2000). Recommendation of 21st December 1999 on safe and efficient in-vehicle information and communication systems: A European statement of principles on human machine interface. Official Journal, 2000/53/EC.
10. Groeger, J. (2000). Understanding driving. Psychology Press, Hove.
11. Hauß, Y. and Eyferth, K. (2001). The evaluation of a multi-sector-planner concept: SALSA - A new approach to measure situation awareness in ATC. Fourth International Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar ATM-2001. (http://atm2001.eurocontrol.fr./finalpapers/pap 136.pdf).
12. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York.
13. Klein, G. (2000). Cognitive task analysis of teams. In J. M. Schraagen, S. F. Chipman and T. D. Shalin (Eds.). Cognitive task analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp. 417-430.
14. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. Freeman, San Francisco.
15. McKenna, F. P and Crick, J. L. (1994). Hazard perception in drivers: A methodology for testing and training. Transport Research Laboratory (Contractor Report 313), pp. 1-29.
16. Miura, T. (1986). Coping with situational demands: A study of eye movements and periph-erial vision performance. In A. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, C. M. Haselgrave, P. Smith and S. H. Taylor (Eds.). Vision in vehicles-II. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
17. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. Freeman, San Francisco.
18. Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88(1), 1-15.
19. Norman, D. A. and Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz and D. Shapiro (Eds.). Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1-18.
20. Rousseau, R., Tremblay, S. and Breton, R. (2005). Defining and modeling situation awareness: A critical review. In S. Banbury and S. Tremblay (Eds.). A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory and application. Ashgate, Hampshire Burlington, pp. 3-21.
21. Williams, L. J. (1985). Tunnel vision induced by a foveal load manipulation. Human Factors, 27, 221-227.
22. Williams, L. J. (1995). Peripheral target recognition and visual field narrowing in aviators and nonaviators. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5(2), 215-232.
23. Winsum, W. van, Martens, M. H. and Herland, L. (1999). The effects of speech versus tactile driver support messages on workload, driver behaviour and user acceptance (Report No. TM-99-C043). TNO Human Factors. Soesterberg, the Netherlands.