Driving automation state-of-mind: Using training to instigate rapid mental model development

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 83, Issue , 2020, Pages

  Krampell, Martin ^a   Solís Marcos, Ignacio ^a   Hjälmdahl, Magnus ^a  

^a SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Driver training; Driving experience; Human automation interaction

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; DRIVER TRAINING; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATION SYSTEMS; DRIVING EXPERIENCES; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTIONS; INCREASED SAFETY; INHERENT LIMITATIONS; PARTIAL AUTOMATION; PROOF OF CONCEPT; TRAINING PROGRAM;

AUTOMATION;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRIVER; DRIVING ABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DEVELOPMENT; MOTIVATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; TRAINING; VALIDATION STUDY; ATTENTION; CAR; CAR DRIVING; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; AUTOMOBILES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 85074644814     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102986     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Bailly, B., Bellet, T., Goupil, C., Drivers' mental representations: experimental study and training perspectives. Dorn, L., (eds.) Driver Behaviour and Training, 2003, Ashgate, Burlington VT, 359–370.
2. Baldwin, T.T., Ford, J.K., Transfer of training: a review and directions for future research. Pers. Psychol. 41:1 (1988), 63–105.
3. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Keep the driver in control: automating automobiles of the future. Appl. Ergon. 53:Part B (2016), 389–395, 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.020.
4. Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F., The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychology And Behaviour, 2013, 1847–1857, 10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006.
5. Bell, B., Kozlowski, S., Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:2 (2008), 296–316.
6. Bellet, T., Bailly-Asuni, B., Mayenobe, P., Banet, A., A theoretical and methodological framework for studying and modelling drivers' mental representations. Saf. Sci. 47 (2009), 1205–1221, 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.03.014 Research in Ergonomic Psychology in the Transportation Field in France.
7. Bhatti, M., Kaur, S., The role of individual and training design factors on training transfer. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 34:7 (2010), 656–672, 10.1108/03090591011070770.
8. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3:2 (2006), 77–101, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
9. Butcher, K.R., Learning from text with diagrams: promoting mental model development and inference generation. J. Educ. Psychol., 98(1), 2006, 182.
10. Campbell, J.L., Brown, J.L., Graving, J.S., Richard, C.M., Lichty, M.G., Bacon, L.P., Sanquist, T., Human Factors Design Guidance for Level 2 and Level 3 Automated Driving Concepts (Report No. DOT HS 812 555)., 2018, August, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
11. Carsten, O., Jamson, A.H., Chapter 7: Driving Simulators As Research Tools In Traffic Psychology. Handbook Of Traffic Psychology. 2011, 87–96, 10.1016/B978-0-12-381984-0.10007-4.
12. Carsten, O., Lai, F.C., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated?. Hum. Factors 54:5 (2012), 747–761.
13. Casner, S.M., Hutchins, E.L., What do we tell the drivers? Toward minimum driver training standards for partially automated cars. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 13:2 (2019), 55–66.
14. Castro, C., Ventsislavova, P., Peña-Suarez, E., Gugliotta, A., Garcia-Fernandez, P., Eisman, E., Crundall, D., Proactive listening to a training commentary improves hazard prediction. Saf. Sci., 2016, 82144–82154, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.018.
15. Clark, R., Estes, F., Cognitive task analysis for training. Int. J. Educ. Res. 25:5 (1996), 403–417.
16. Creswell, J.W., Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. third ed., 2009, Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, US.
17. Cuenen, A., Jongen, E.M., Brijs, T., Brijs, K., Lutin, M., Van Vlierden, K., Wets, G., The relations between specific measures of simulated driving ability and functional ability: new insights for assessment and training programs of older drivers. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychology And Behaviour, 2016, 3965–3978, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.05.007.
18. de Winter, J.C., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A., Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychology And Behaviour 27:Part B (2014), 196–217, 10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016.
19. Endsley, M.R., Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 32, 1988, SAGE Publications, 97–101 No. 2.
20. Endsley, M.R., Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37:1 (1995), 32–64, 10.1518/001872095779049543.
21. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, Methodological Issues and Strategies in Clinical Research. fourth ed., 2016, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 495–512, 10.1037/14805-030.
22. Ford, J.K., Weissbein, D.A., Transfer of training: an updated review and analysis. Perform. Improv. Q., 10(2), 1997, 22, 10.1111/j.1937-8327.1997.tb00047.x.
23. Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., Krems, J., Keinath, A., User education in automated driving: owner's manual and interactive tutorial support mental model formation and human-automation interaction. Information, 10(4), 2019, 143.
24. Frese, M., Albrecht, K., Altmann, A., Lang, J., Papstein, P.V., Peyerl, R., et al. The effects of an active development of the mental model in the training process: experimental results in a word processing system. Behav. Inf. Technol. 7:3 (1988), 295–304, 10.1080/01449298808901879.
25. Giannini, A.M., Ferlazzo, F., Sgalla, R., Cordellieri, P., Baralla, F., Pepe, S., The use of videos in road safety training: cognitive and emotional effects. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2013, 52111–52117, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.023.
26. Gist, M.E., Training design and pedagogy: implications for skill acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Quiñones, M.A., Ehrenstein, A., Quiñones, M.A., Ehrenstein, A., (eds.) Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace: Applications of Psychological Research, 1997, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 201–222, 10.1037/10260-008.
27. Goode, N., Salmon, P.M., Lenné, M.G., Simulation-based driver and vehicle crew training: applications, efficacy and future directions. Appl. Ergon. 44 (2013), 435–444, 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.007.
28. Grohmann, A., Kauffeld, S., Beller, J., Exploring the critical role of motivation to transfer in the training transfer process. Int. J. Train. Dev. 18:2 (2014), 84–103, 10.1111/ijtd.12030.
29. Hatakka, M., Keskinen, E., Gregersen, N.P., Glad, A., Hernetkoski, K., From control of the vehicle to personal self-control; broadening the perspectives to driver education. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 5:3 (2002), 201–215.
30. Horswill, M.S., Taylor, K., Newnam, S., Wetton, M., Hill, A., Even highly experienced drivers benefit from a brief hazard perception training intervention. Accid. Anal. Prev. 52 (2013), 100–110, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.014.
31. Huang, J.L., Ford, J.K., Driving locus of control and driving behaviors: inducing change through driver training. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychology And Behaviour 15 (2012), 358–368, 10.1016/j.trf.2011.09.002.
32. Huth, V., Bueno, M., Fort, A., Brusque, C., Synthesis of new knowledge on adaptation processes in response to ADAS and associated advances in research methods: chapter 16. Stevens, A., Brusque, C., Krems, J., (eds.) Driver Adaptation to Information and Assistance Systems, 2014, 219–234 (France, Europe).
33. Isler, R.B., Starkey, N.J., Williamson, A.R., Video-based road commentary training improves hazard perception of young drivers in a dual task. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41 (2009), 445–452, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.016.
34. Isler, R.B., Starkey, N.J., Sheppard, P., Effects of higher-order driving skill training on young, inexperienced drivers' on-road driving performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (2011), 1818–1827, 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.017.
35. Jackson, L., Chapman, P., Crundall, D., What happens next? Predicting other road users' behaviour as a function of driving experience and processing time. Ergonomics 52:2 (2009), 154–164, 10.1080/00140130802030714.
36. Kim, B., Park, H., Baek, Y., Not just fun, but serious strategies: using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Comput. Educ. 52:4 (2009), 800–810.
37. Koustanaï, A., Cavallo, V., Delhomme, P., Mas, A., Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust. Hum. Factors 54:5 (2012), 709–721, 10.1177/0018720812441796.
38. Kruger, J., Dunning, D., Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 77:6 (1999), 1121–1134, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.
39. Lai, F., Hjälmdahl, M., Chorlton, K., Wiklund, M., The long-term effect of intelligent speed adaptation on driver behaviour. Appl. Ergon. 41:2 (2010), 179–186, 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.03.003.
40. Larsson, A.F., Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control. Appl. Ergon., 2012, 43501–43506, 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.005.
41. Larsson, A.F., Kircher, K., Andersson Hultgren, J., Learning from experience: familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychology And Behaviour 27:Part B (2014), 229–237, 10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.008.
42. Lonero, L.P., The young driver: trends in driver education and training. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35 (2008), S316–S323, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.023.
43. Malone, S., Brünken, R., Hazard perception assessment – how much ecological validity is necessary?. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 2769–2776, 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.713.
44. Manser, M.P., Creaser, J., Boyle, L.N., Behavioural adaptation. Rudin-Brown, C., Jamson, S., (eds.) Behavioural Adaptation and Road Safety: Theory, Evidence and Action, 2013, CRC Press, 339–359.
45. Matthews, M., Bryant, D., Webb, R., Harbluk, J., Model for situation awareness and driving: application to analysis and research for intelligent transportation systems. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board(1779), 2001, 26–32.
46. Mayhew, D., Simpson, H., The safety value of driver education and training. Inj. Prev., 8(Suppl. 2), 2002, 10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii3 ii3-ii7.
47. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C., Daly, M., Carsten, O.M., Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychology And Behaviour 27:Part B (2014), 274–282, 10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005.
48. OECD, Behavioural Adaptations to Changes in the Road Transport System. 1990, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
49. Piccinini, G.B., Simões, A., Rodrigues, C.M., Effects on driving task and road safety impact induced by the usage of adaptive cruise control (ACC): a focus groups study. Int. J. Hum. Factors Ergon., 1(3), 2012, 234.
50. Piccinini, G.F.B., Rodrigues, C.M., Leitão, M., Simões, A., Driver's behavioral adaptation to Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC): the case of speed and time headway. J. Saf. Res. 49 (2014), 77–84, 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.010.
51. Piccinini, G.F.B., Rodrigues, C.M., Leitão, M., Simões, A., Reaction to a critical situation during driving with Adaptive Cruise Control for users and non-users of the system. Saf. Sci., 2015, 72116–72126, 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.008.
52. Pollatsek, A., Vlakveld, W., Kappe, B., Pradhan, A.K., Fisher, D.L., Driving simulators as training and evaluation tools: novice drivers. Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering. Med. Psychol., 2011, 334–337.
53. Renta-Davids, A., Jiménez-González, J., Fandos-Garrido, M., González-Soto, A., Transfer of learning: motivation, training design and learning-conducive work effects. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 38:8 (2014), 1–19.
54. Riding, R.J., Sadler-Smith, E., Cognitive style and learning strategies: some implications for training design. Int. J. Train. Dev., 1(3), 1997, 199, 10.1111/1468-2419.00020.
55. Rudin-Brown, C., Jamson, S., Conclusions and future directions. Rudin-Brown, C., Jamson, S., (eds.) Behavioural Adaptation and Road Safety: Theory, Evidence and Action, 2013, CRC Press, 429–433.
56. Rudin-Brown, C.M., Parker, H.A., Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychology And Behaviour, 2004, 759–776, 10.1016/j.trf.2004.02.001.
57. SAE, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. 2018, SAE Standard J3016, USA.
58. Saffarian, M., De Winter, J., Happee, R., Automated driving: human-factors issues and design solutions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012), 2012, 2296–2300, 10.1177/1071181312561483.
59. Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., The science of training: a decade of progress. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52 (2001), 471–499, 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471.
60. Scialfa, C.T., Deschênes, M.C., Ference, J., Boone, J., Horswill, M.S., Wetton, M., A hazard perception test for novice drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2011, 43204–43208, 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.010.
61. Scialfa, C.T., Borkenhagen, D., Lyon, J., Deschênes, M., A comparison of static and dynamic hazard perception tests. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2013, 51268–51273, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.006.
62. Soliman, A., Mathna, E., Metacognitive strategy training improves driving situation awareness. Soc. Behav. Personal. 37:9 (2009), 1161–1170, 10.2224/sbp.2009.37.9.1161.
63. Solís-Marcos, I., Ahlström, C., Kircher, K., Performance of an additional task during Level 2 automated driving: an on-road study comparing drivers with and without experience with partial automation. Hum. Factors, 2018, 10.1177/0018720818773636.
64. Stanton, N., Walker, G., Young, M., Kazi, T., Salmon, P., Changing drivers' minds: the evaluation of an advanced driver coaching system. Ergonomics 50:8 (2007), 1209–1234, 10.1080/00140130701322592.
65. Stanton, N.A., Young, M., McCaulder, B., Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety science 27:2–3 (1997), 149–159.
66. Stoner, H.A., Fisher, D.L., Mollenhauer, M., Simulator and scenario factors influencing simulator sickness. Fisher, D.L., Caird, J., Lee, J.D., (eds.) Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine, and Psychology, 2011, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 14.11–14.20.
67. Summala, H., Hierarchical model of behavioural adaptation and traffic accidents. Rothengatter, T., Carbonell Vaya, E., (eds.) Traffic and Transport Psychology, 1997, Theory and application, 41–52.
68. Underwood, G., Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver. Ergonomics 50:8 (2007), 1235–1249.
69. Victor, T., Tivesten, E., Gustavsson, G., Johansson, J., Sangberg, F., Ljung Aust, M., Automation expectation mismatch: incorrect prediction despite eyes on threat and hands on wheel. Hum. Factors 60:8 (2018), 1095–1116.
70. Vlakveld, W.P., A comparative study of two desktop hazard perception tasks suitable for mass testing in which scores are not based on response latencies. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 22 (2014), 218–231.
71. Vogel, K., Kircher, A., Alm, H., Nilsson, L., Traffic sense—which factors influence the skill to predict the development of traffic scenes?. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2003, 35749–35762, 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00078-7.
72. Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Kazi, T.A., Salmon, P.M., Jenkins, D.P., Does advanced driver training improve situational awareness?. Appl. Ergon., 2009, 40678–40687, 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.002.
73. Wallis, T.S., Horswill, M.S., Using fuzzy signal detection theory to determine why experienced and trained drivers respond faster than novices in a hazard perception test. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39:6 (2007), 1177–1185.
74. Wege, C.A., Pereira, M., Victor, T.W., Krems, J.F., Behavioural adaptation in response to driving assistance technologies; A literature review. Stevens, A., Brusque, C., Krems, J., (eds.) Driver Adaptation to Information and Assistance Systems, 2014, 13–34 (2013).
75. Wetton, M.A., Hill, A., Horswill, M.S., The development and validation of a hazard perception test for use in driver licensing. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2011, 431759–431770, 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.007.
76. Xiong, H., Boyle, L.N., Moeckli, J., Dow, B.R., Brown, T.L., Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 54:5 (2012), 722–733.
77. Yamani, Y., Samuel, S., Knodler, M.A., Fisher, D.L., Evaluation of the effectiveness of a multi-skill program for training younger drivers on higher cognitive skills. Appl. Ergon., 2016, 52135–52141, 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.005.
78. Young, K.L., Salmon, P.M., Cornelissen, M., Missing links? The effects of distraction on driver situation awareness. Saf. Sci. 56 (2013), 36–43, 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.11.004.