Should I take over? Does system knowledge help drivers in making take-over decisions while driving a partially automated car?

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 60, Issue , 2019, Pages 669-684

  Boelhouwer, A ^a   van den Beukel, A P ^a   van der Voort, M C ^a   Martens, M H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automated vehicles; Human factors; Human machine interaction; In car interaction; Mental models; Take over decisions

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

AUTOMATED VEHICLES; DANGEROUS SITUATIONS; HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MENTAL MODEL; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; SPECIFIC INFORMATION; SYSTEM DESCRIPTION; TAKE-OVER DECISIONS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85058445900     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, J.M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K.D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., Oluwatola, O.A., Autonomous Vehicle Technology A Guide for Policymakers., 2016, 10.7249/RR443-2.
2. ANWB, 2016. Welke rijhulpsystemen zijn er? Retrieved November 7, 2017, from https://www.anwb.nl/auto/zelfrijdende-auto/rijhulpsystemen.
3. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Harvey, C., Sub-systems on the road to vehicle automation: Hands and feet free but not “mind” free driving. Safety Science 62 (2014), 505–514, 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.014.
4. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K.M., Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 95 (2017), 49–63, 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.013.
5. Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., Schleinitz, K., Krems, J. F., Othersen, I., & Petermann-Stock, I. (2015). What would drivers like to know during automated driving? Information needs at different levels of automation. In 7thConference on Driver Assistance (Vol. 49). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2462.6007.
6. Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F., The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 18 (2013), 47–57, 10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006.
7. Beggiato, M. (2014). Changes in motivational and higher level cognitive processes when interacting with in-vehicle automation. [Dissertation, Technischen Universität Chemnitz]. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-167333.
8. Cassidy, A.M., Mental models, trust, and reliance: Exploring the effect of human perceptions on automation use. 2009, Naval Postgraduate School.
9. CBR (2015). Ondersteunende systemen toegestaan in rijexamen. Retrieved January 1, 2018, from https://www.cbr.nl/312.pp?id=988.
10. Cui, J. (2009). Model and Working Correlation Structure Selection in GEE Analyses of Longitudinal Data. [Powerpoint slides]. Retrieved from https://www.stata.com/meeting/australia09/aunz09_cui.pdf.
11. De Visser, E. J., Cohen, M., Freedy, A., & Parasuraman, R. (2014). A design methodology for trust cue calibration in cognitive agents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8525 LNCS(PART 1), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07458-0_24.
12. Dingus, T. A., Klauer, S. G., Neale, V. L., Petersen, A., Lee, S. E., Sudweeks, J., … Knipling, R. R. (2006). The 100-Car naturalistic driving study phase II – Results of the 100-Car field experiment.
13. Eichelberger, A.H., McCartt, A.T., Toyota drivers’ experiences with dynamic radar cruise control, pre-collision system, and lane-keeping assist. Journal of Safety Research 56 (2016), 67–73, 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.12.002.
14. Eiriksdottir, E., Catrambone, R., Procedural instructions, principles, and examples: how to structure instructions for procedural tasks to enhance performance, learning, and transfer. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53 (2011), 749–770, 10.1177/0018720811419154.
15. Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K., Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77 (2015), 167–181, 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003.
16. Grotzer, T.A., Expanding our vision for educational technology: procedural, conceptual, and structural knowledge. Retrieved from Educational Technology, 2002, 52–59 http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ664919.
17. IBM Knowledge Center. (n.d.). Choosing a correlation structure. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_sub/spss/tutorials/gee_wheeze_corrtype.html.
18. Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Carsten, O.M.J., Lai, F.C.H., Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 30 (2013), 116–125, 10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.008.
19. Jenness, J. W., Lerner, N. D., Mazor, S., Osberg, J. S., & Tefft, B. C. (2007). Use of advanced in-vehicle technology by young and older early adopters. Survey Results on Sensor-Based Backing Aid Systems and Rear-View Video Cameras. Report No. DOT HS, 810(August), 828. Retrieved from http://www.safercar.gov/staticfiles/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash Avoidance/2007/DOT-HS-810-828rev.pdf.
20. Jenness W. J., Lerner, N. D., Mazor, S., Osber, J. S., & Tefft, B. C. (2008). Use of advanced in-vehicle technology by young and older early adopters: Survey results on headlamp systems, DOT HS 810(March).
21. Karjanto, J., Md. Yusof, N., Terken, J., Delbressine, F., Hassan, M.Z., Rauterberg, M., Simulating autonomous driving styles: Accelerations for three road profiles. MATEC Web of Conferences 90 (2017), 1–16, 10.1051/matecconf/20179001005.
22. Laurgeau, C., Handbook of intelligent vehicles. Eskandarian, A., (eds.) Handbook of intelligent vehicles, Vol. 2, 2012, Springer, London, 1537–1551 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-085-4.
23. Lee, J.D., See, K.A., Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46:1 (2004), 50–80, 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392.
24. Liang, K.Y., Zeger, S.L., Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrics 73:1 (1986), 13–22.
25. Litman, T., Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 42:2014 (2014), 36–42, 10.1613/jair.301.
26. Luo, L., Liu, H., Li, P., & Wang, H. (2010). Model predictive control for adaptive cruise control with multi-objectives: comfort, fuel-economy, safety and car-following, 11(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900374.
27. Martens, M. H., & Van Den Beukel, A. P. (2013). The road to automated driving: Dual mode and human factors considerations. In IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (pp. 2262–2267). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728564.
28. Mercedes-Benz (2015). E-Class Sedan and Wagon Operator's Manual. Retrieved from https://www.mbusa.com/vcm/MB/DigitalAssets/pdfmb/ownersmanual/2015_E_Sed_Wagon.pdf.
29. Mercedes-Benz (2017). Mercedes-Benz Intelligent Drive. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/mercedes-benz/innovation/mercedes-benz-intelligent-drive/.
30. Morando, M. M., Truong, L. T., Vu, H. L. (2017). Investigating safety impacts of autonomous vehicles using traffic micro-simulation. In Australasian Transport Research Forum 2017 Proceedings (pp. 1–6).
31. Muir, B.M., Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 27 (1987), 527–539, 10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80013-5.
32. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2008). National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey Report to Congress, (July), 1–47. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811059.PDF.
33. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2017). Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety, 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.transportation.gov/av.
34. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V., Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuseabuse. Human Factors 39:2 (1997), 230–253.
35. Payre, W., Cestac, J., Dang, N.T., Vienne, F., Delhomme, P., Impact of training and in-vehicle task performance on manual control recovery in an automated car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 216–227, 2017, 10.1016/j.trf.2017.02.001.
36. Peirce, J.W., Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 2 (2008), 1–8, 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008.
37. Pennsylvania State University (n.d.). Advanced Topics I - Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). Retrieved from https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat504/node/179.
38. Rasmussen, J., Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 13:3 (1983), 257–266.
39. Riley, V., Operator reliance and automation: Theory and data. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., (eds.) Human factors in transportation. Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 1996, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hilldale, NJ, US, 19–35.
40. Rouse, W.B., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 22:6 (1992), 1296–1308, 10.1109/21.199457.
41. Rudin-Brown, C.M., Parker, H.A., Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): Implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 7:2 (2004), 59–76, 10.1016/j.trf.2004.02.001.
42. Rumar, K., Driving future vehicles. Parkes, A.M., Franzen, S., (eds.) Driving future vehicles, 1993, Taylor & Francis, London, 44.
43. SAE International (2016). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. Retrieved from http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201609/.
44. Saffarian, M., de Winter, J.C.F., Happee, R., Automated driving: human-factors issues and design solutions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 56 (2012), 2296–2300, 10.1177/1071181312561483.
45. Sainani, K. (n.d.). GEE and Mixed Models for longitudinal data. [Powerpoint slides]. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/Ndcv7b.
46. SARTRE (2014). D.4.3 Report on Fuel Consumption. Retrieved from https://www.sp.se/sv/index/research/dependable_systems/Documents/The SARTRE project.pdf.
47. Sheridan, T.B., Humans and automation: System design and research issues. 2002, Inc, John Wiley & Sons, Santa Monica, CA, US.
48. Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S., A proposed psychological model of driving automation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 1:4 (2000), 315–331, 10.1080/14639220052399131.
49. Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S., Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics 48:10 (2005), 1294–1313, 10.1080/00140130500252990.
50. Stupica, B. (2011). Generalized estimating equations (GEE): A modern love story [Powerpoint slides]. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/hrBKSr.
51. Swedish Transport Agency (2014). Autonomous Driving, 1–10.
52. Tesla (2017). Autopilot. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from https://www.tesla.com/nl_NL/autopilot.
53. Tesla (2018). Model S Owner's Manual. Retrieved from https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/model_s_owners_manual_north_america_en_us.pdf.
54. Van Wee, B., Annema, J.A., Banister, D., The transport system and transport policy, an introduction. 2013, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
55. Volvo (2018). S90 Owner's Manual.
56. Weinberger, M., Winner, H., Bubb, H., Adaptive cruise control field operational test - the learning phase. JSAE Review 22 (2001), 487–494, 10.1016/S0389-4304(01)00142-4.
57. Ziegler, A., Vens, M., Generalized estimating equations: Notes on the choice of the working correlation matrix. Methods of Information in Medicine 49:5 (2010), 421–425, 10.3414/ME10-01-0026.