Mode awareness and automated driving-What is it and how can it be measured

Information (Switzerland)

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2020, Pages

  Kurpiers, Christina ^a   Biebl, Bianca ^a   Hernandez, Julia Mejia ^a   Raisch, Florian ^a  

^a BMW GROUP   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Measurement method; Mode awareness; SAE Level 2; SAE Level 3

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATION SYSTEMS; GOLD STANDARDS; MEASUREMENT METHODS; OPERATIONAL DESIGN; RESEARCH FOCUS; SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERS; TRAFFIC SITUATIONS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85086082359     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20782489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/INFO11050277     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Fagnant, D.J.; Kockelman, K. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A Pol. Practice 2015, 77, 167-181.
2. Treat, J.; Tumbas, N.; McDonald, S.; Shinar, D.; Hume, R. Tri-Level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents. Executive Summary; U.S. Department of Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 1979; pp. 1-328.
3. SAE International. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for on-Road Motor Vehicles; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2018.
4. Endsley, M.R. From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human-automation research. Hum. Factors 2017, 59, 5-27.
5. Feldhütter, A.; Segler, C.; Bengler, K. Does shifting between conditionally and partially automated driving lead to a loss of mode awareness? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 17-21 July 2017; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2018.
6. Sarter, N.B.;Woods, D.D. How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum. Factors 1995, 37, 5-19.
7. Strauch, B. Ironies of automation: Still unresolved after all these years. IEEE T. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 2017, 48, 419-433.
8. Bainbridge, L. Ironies of automation. IFAC Proc. Vol. 1983, 15, 129-135.
9. Kurpiers, C.; Lechner, D.; Raisch, F. The influence of a gaze direction based attention request to maintain mode awareness. In Proceedings of the 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 10-13 June 2019.
10. Naujoks, F.; Purucker, C.; Neukum, A.;Wolter, S.; Steiger, R. Controllability of partially automated driving functions-Does it matter whether drivers are allowed to take their hands off the steering wheel? Transp. Res. Part A Traff. Psych. Beh. 2015, 35, 185-198.
11. Boos, A. Habituation Effects in Automated Driving: The Influences of Exposure Duration and Exposure Frequency on VisualMonitoring Behaviour. Master's Thesis, Technical UniversityMunich, Munich, Germany, 2018.
12. Endsley, M.R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 1995, 37, 32-64.
13. Endsley, M.R.; Kiris, E.O. The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors 1995, 37, 381-394.
14. Kaber, D.B.; Endsley, M.R. The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theor. Issues Ergon. 2004, 5, 113-153.
15. Gold, C.; Damböck, D.; Lorenz, L.; Bengler, K. "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 30 September-4 October 2013; Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2013.
16. Monk, A. Mode errors: A user-centred analysis and some preventative measures using keying-contingent sound. J. Man.-Mach. Stud. 1986, 24, 313-327.
17. Kolbig, M.; Müller, S. Mode Awareness im Fahrkontext: Eine theoretische Betrachtung. In Proceedings of the BerlingerWerkstatt Mensch-Maschine Systeme, Berlin, Germany, 10-12 October 2013; Brandenburg, E., Doria, L., Gross, A., Günzler, T., Smieszek, H., Eds.; Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 2013.
18. Othersen, I. Vom Fahrer zum Denker und Teilzeitlenker; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016.
19. Bredereke, J.; Lankenau, A. Safety-relevant mode confusions-Modelling and reducing them. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 2005, 88, 229-245.
20. Bredereke, J.; Lankenau, A. A rigorous view of mode confusion. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security, Catania, Italy, 10-13 September 2002; Anderson, S., Felici, M., Bologna, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002.
21. Sarter, N. Investigating mode errors on automated flight decks: Illustrating the problem-driven, cumulative, and interdisciplinary nature of human factors research. Hum. Factors 2008, 50, 506-510.
22. Dekker, S. The field Guide to Understanding Human Error, 3rd ed.; Ashgate Publishing Ltd.: Aldershot, UK, 2006.
23. Lindberg, T. Entwicklung Einer ABK-Metapher für Gruppierte Fahrerassistenzsysteme; Dr. Hut: Berlin, Germany, 2012; pp. 1-329.
24. Rettenmaier, M. Mode Awareness im Fahrzeug: Absicherung von hochautomatisiertem Fahren. Master's Thesis, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany, 2017.
25. Lee, J.D.; See, K.A. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 2004, 46, 50-80.
26. Parasuraman, R.; Riley, V. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors 1997, 39, 230-253.
27. Martinez von Bülow, R.; Raisch, F. Driver assistance systems: Highly automated driving-Acceptance and benefit for customers. In Proceedings of the VDA Technical Congress, Berlin, Germany, 27-28 February 2018.
28. Van Loon, R.J.; Martens, M.H. Automated driving and its effect on the safety ecosystem: How do compatibility issues affect the transition period? Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 3280-3285.
29. Hergeth, S.; Lorenz, L.; Vilimek, R.; Krems, J.F. Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Hum. Factors 2016, 58, 509-519.
30. Parasuraman, R.; Manzey, D.H. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Hum. Factors 2010, 52, 381-410.
31. Moray, N.; Inagaki, T. Attention and complacency. Theor. Issues Ergon. 2000, 1, 354-365.
32. Manzey, D.; Reichenbach, J.; Onnasch, L. Human performance consequences of automated decision aids: The impact of degree of automation and system experience. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 2012, 6, 57-87.
33. Forster, Y.; Naujoks, F.; Neukum, A. Your turn or my turn? Design of a human-machine interface for conditional automation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 24-26 October 2016.
34. Naujoks, F.; Purucker, C.; Wiedemann, K.; Neukum, A.; Wolter, S.; Steiger, R. Driving performance at lateral system limits during partially automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2017, 108, 147-162.
35. Kromann, C.B.; Jensen, M.L.; Ringsted, C. The effect of testing on skills learning. Med. Educ. 2009, 43, 21-27.
36. Banks, V.A.; Stanton, N.A. Discovering driver-vehicle coordination problems in future automated control systems: Evidence from verbal commentaries. Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 2497-2504.
37. Endsley, M.R. Autonomous driving systems: A preliminary naturalistic study of the Tesla Model S. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 2017, 11, 225-238.
38. Klauer, S.G.; Dingus, T.A.; Neale, V.L.; Sudweeks, J.D.; Ramsey, D.J. The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. NHTSA 2006, 594.
39. Naujoks, F.; Befelein, D.; Wiedemann, K.; Neukum, A. A review of non-driving-related tasks used in studies on automated driving. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Prague, Czech Republic, 26-28 October 2016; Naujoks, F., Befelein, D., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2017.
40. Feldhütter, A.; Gold, C.; Schneider, S.; Bengler, K. How the duration of automated driving influences take-over performance and gaze behavior. In Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 309-318.
41. De Winter, J.C.; Happee, R.; Martens, M.H.; Stanton, N.A. Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part A Traff. Psych. Beh. 2014, 27, 196-217.
42. Toffetti, A.;Wilschut, E.S.; Martens, M.H.; Schieben, A.; Rambaldini, A.; Merat, N.; Flemisch, F. CityMobil: Human factor issues regarding highly automated vehicles on eLane. Transp. Res. Rec. 2009, 2110, 1-8.
43. Victor, T.W.; Tivesten, E.; Gustavsson, P.; Johansson, J.; Sangberg, F.; Ljung Aust, M. Automation expectation mismatch: Incorrect prediction despite eyes on threat and hands on wheel. Hum. Factors 2018, 60, 1095-1116.
44. Wang, J.; Söffker, D. Bridging gaps among human, assisted, and automated driving with DVIs: Aconceptional experimental study. IEEE T. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 20, 2096-2108.
45. Wickens, C.D. Attention to safety and the psychology of surprise. In Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH, USA, 5-8 March 2001.
46. Körber, M.; Cingel, A.; Zimmermann, M.; Bengler, K. Vigilance decrement and passive fatigue caused by monotony in automated driving. Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 2403-2409.
47. Feldhütter, A.; Härtwig, N.; Kurpiers, C.; Hernandez, J.M.; Bengler, K. Effect on mode awareness when changing from conditionally to partially automated driving. In Proceedings of the Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Florence, Italy, 26-30 August 2019; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019.
48. Crundall, D.E.; Underwood, G. Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers. Ergonomics 1998, 41, 448-458.
49. Land, M.F.; Lee, D.N. Where we look when we steer. Nature 1994, 369, 742-744.
50. Recarte, M.A.; Nunes, L.M. Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2000, 6, 31-43.
51. Summala, H.; Nieminen, T.; Punto, M. Maintaining lane position with peripheral vision during in-vehicle tasks. Hum. Factors 1996, 38, 442-451.
52. Jian, J.-Y.; Bisantz, A.M.; Drury, C.G. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 2000, 4, 53-71.
53. Madsen, M.; Gregor, S. Measuring human-computer trust. In Proceedings of the 11th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia, 6-8 December 2000.
54. Åkerstedt, T.; Gillberg, M. Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int. J. Neurosci. 1990, 52, 29-37.