The role of system description for conditionally automated vehicles

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 54, Issue , 2018, Pages 159-170

  Blömacher, Katja ^a,b   Nöcker, Gerhard ^a   Huff, Markus ^b  

^a DAIMLER AG   (Germany)

^b Department of Research Infrastructures ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Conditionally automated driving; Mental models; Trust; Video study

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; VEHICLES;

ACCEPTANCE; AUTOMATED DRIVING; MENTAL MODEL; TRUST; VIDEO STUDY;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85042316283     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1 (2015), 1–48, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
2. Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F., The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 18 (2013), 47–57.
3. Breton, R. & Rousseau, R. (2001). Situational awareness. A review of the concept and its measurement. Technical Report No. 2001–220, Defense Research and Development Canada, Valcartier.
4. Broadbent, D., Perception and communication. 1958, Pergamon Press, London.
5. Dekker, S., Hollnagel, E., Human factors and folk models. Cognition, Technology & Work 6:2 (2004), 79–86.
6. Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S., On the independence of compliance and reliance: Are automation false alarms worse than misses?. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49:4 (2007), 564–572.
7. Endsley, M. R. (1988). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1988. NAECON 1988, Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National (pp. 789–795). IEEE.
8. Endsley, M.R., Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37:1 (1995), 32–64.
9. Endsley, M.R., Kaber, D.B., Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics 42:3 (1999), 462–492.
10. Firestone, C., Scholl, B.J., Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 2016.
11. Fox, John, Weisberg, Sanford, An {R} companion to applied regression. 2nd ed., 2011, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion.
12. Fracker, M. L. (1988). A theory of situation assessment: Implications for measuring situation awareness. In Proceedings of the human factors society 32nd annual meeting (pp. 102–106). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society (aus WIckens 2008).
13. Gentner, D. (2002). Mental models, Psychology of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Bates (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 9683–9687). Amsterdam Elsevier Science.
14. Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J.D., Boyle, L.N., Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work 14:1 (2012), 39–49.
15. Hegarty, M., Just, M.A., Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language 32:6 (1993), 717–742.
16. Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., Krems, J.F., Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human Factors 58:3 (2016), 509–519.
17. Jenness, J. W., Lerner, N. D., Mazor, S., Osberg, J. S., & Tefft, B. C. (2008). Use of advanced in-vehicle technology by young and older early adopters. Survey Results on Adaptive Cruise Control Systems. Report No. DOT HS, 810, 917.
18. Jian, J.Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G., Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4:1 (2000), 53–71.
19. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness (No. 6). Harvard University Press.
20. Karrer, K., Glaser, C., Clemens, C., Bruder, C., Technikaffinität erfassen–der Fragebogen TA-EG. Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt Technischer Systeme 8 (2009), 196–201.
21. Kazi, T. A., Stanton, N. A., Young, M. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Assessing drivers’ level of trust in Adaptive-Cruise-Control and their conceptual models of the system: Implications for the system design. In L. Dorn (Ed.), Driver Behaviour and Training – Volume 2 (pp. 132–142). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
22. Kieras, D.E., Bovair, S., The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device. Cognitive Science 8:3 (1984), 255–273.
23. Lee, J.D., See, K.A., Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46:1 (2004), 50–80.
24. Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D.A., Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Human Factors 49:5 (2007), 773–785.
25. Mehlenbacher, B., Wogalter, M. S., & Laughery, K. R. (2002, September). On the reading of product owner's manuals: Perceptions and product complexity. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 730–734). SAGE Publications.
26. Moray, N., Inagaki, T., Itoh, M., Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(1), 2000, 44.
27. Najm, W. G., Stearns, M. D., Howarth, H., Koopmann, J., & Hitz, J. (2006). Evaluation of an automotive rear-end collision avoidance system (No. DOT-VNTSC-NHTSA-06-01).
28. Parasuraman, R., Hancock, P.A., Olofinboba, O., Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems. Ergonomics 40:3 (1997), 390–399.
29. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D., Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 2:2 (2008), 140–160.
30. Rajaonah, B., Anceaux, F., Vienne, F., Trust and the use of adaptive cruise control: A study of a cut-in situation. Cognition, Technology & Work 8:2 (2006), 146–155.
31. Rajaonah, B., Tricot, N., Anceaux, F., Millot, P., The role of intervening variables in driver–ACC cooperation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66:3 (2008), 185–197.
32. Rammstedt, B., The 10-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10): Norm values and investigation of socio-demographic effects based on a German population representative sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 23 (2007), 193–201.
33. Rammstedt, B., John, O.P., Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality 41:1 (2007), 203–212.
34. SAE International (2014). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems (J3016). < http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201401/>.
35. Schwartz, D.L., Black, J.B., Analog imagery in mental model reasoning: Depictive models. Cognitive Psychology 30 (1996), 154–219.
36. Seppelt, B.D., Lee, J.D., Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65:3 (2007), 192–205.
37. Talarico, J.M., Rubin, D.C., Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science 14:5 (2003), 455–461.
38. Treisman, A., Selective attention in man. British Medical Bulletin 20 (1964), 12–16.
39. Van Der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., De Waard, D., A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 5:1 (1997), 1–10.
40. Wickens, C. D. (1996). Situation awareness: impact of automation and display technology. In Situation awareness: Limitations and Enhancement in the aviation environment (pp. k2.1-k2.13). Brussels AGARD Conference Proceedings. (aus Diss Rauch).
41. Wickens, C.D., Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50:3 (2008), 449–455.
42. Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, S.B.G., Sensation Seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46 (1978), 139–149.