Linking ‘task’ and curricular thinking An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda

Task-Based Language Teaching

Volumn 8, Issue , 2015, Pages 193-224

  Byrnes, Heidi ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85150268981     PISSN: 1877346X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/tblt.8.07byr     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Allen, L. (2000). Designing curriculum for standards-based culture/language learning. Northeast Conference Reviw, 47, 14–21.
2. Bernhardt, E., Valdés, G., & Miano, A. (2010). A chronicle of Standards-based curricular reform in a research university. In V. M. Scott (Ed.), Principles and practices of the Standards in college foreign language education (pp. 54–85). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.
3. Breen, M., & Candlin, C. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89–112. DOI: 10.1093/applin/1.2.89
4. Breen, M., Hird, B., Milton, M. Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22, 470–501. DOI: 10.1093/applin/22.4.470
5. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
6. Bunch, G., & Willett, K. (2013). Writing to mean in middle school: Understanding how second language writers negotiate textually-rich content-area instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 141–178. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.007
7. Busse, V., & Walter, C. (2013). Foreign language motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. Modern Language Journal, 97, 435–456. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12004.x
8. Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.
9. Bygate, M., Norris, J., & Van den Branden, K. (2009). Coda: Understanding TBLT at the interface between research and pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 495–499). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tblt.1.31byg
10. Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (Guest eds.). (2015). The language and thought of motion in second language speakers. Modern Language Journal, 99-S.
11. Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437. DOI: 10.1191/0265532202lt238oa
12. Byrnes, H. (2005). Literacy as a framework for advanced language acquisition. ADFL Bulletin, 37(1), 11–15. DOI: 10.1632/adfl.37.1.11
13. Byrnes, H. (2007). Language acquisition and language learning. In D. G. Nicholls (Ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures, (3rd. ed.) (pp. 48–69). New York, NY: MLA.
14. Byrnes, H. (Ed.). (2009). Instructed foreign language acquisition as meaning-making: A systemic functional approach. Special Issue: Linguistics and Education, 20, 1–79.
15. Byrnes, H. (2012a). Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A genre-based systemic functional linguistic approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 190–218). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
16. Byrnes, H. (2012b). Of frameworks and the goals of collegiate foreign language education: Critical reflections. Applied Linguistics Review, 3, 1–24. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2012-0001
17. Byrnes, H. (2013). Positioning writing as meaning-making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 95–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.004
18. Byrnes, H. (2014a). Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 235–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tblt.7.10byr
19. Byrnes, H. (2014b). Theorizing language development at the intersection of ‘task’ and L2 writing: Reconsidering complexity. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 79–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tblt.7.04byr
20. Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H.H., & Sprang, K.A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–110. DOI: 10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017864
21. Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R.M. (Eds.). (2014a). Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tblt.7
22. Byrnes, H., & Manchon, R.M. (2014b). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing: An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchon (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tblt.7.01byr
23. Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R.M. (2014c). Task, task performance, and writing development: Advancing the constructs and the research agenda. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 265–296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tblt.7.11byr
24. Byrnes, H., Maxim, H.H., & Norris, J.M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94, s-1, iv–vi, 1–235. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01135.x
25. Christie, F. (2012). Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Language Learning, 62, S-1. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00677.x
26. Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
27. Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.
28. Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross-disciplinary review. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Social Science Research Institute, Center for Second Language Classroom Research (Technical Report No. 4).
29. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728906002732
30. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 431–469. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100010287
31. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Flowerdew, J. (2011). Reconciling contrasting approaches to genre analysis: The whole can equal more than the sum of the parts. In D. Belcher, A.M. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for Specific Purposes research (pp. 119–144). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
34. Gebhard, M., Chen, I-A., Graham, H., & Gunawan, W. (2013).Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 107–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.005
35. Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K–12 schools: A response to school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 45–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.007
36. Gebhard, M., Willet, J., Jimenez, J., & Piedra A. (2010). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers’ professional development, and ELLS’ academic literacy practices. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners (pp. 91–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
37. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
38. Haim, O. (2015). Investigating transfer of academic proficiency among trilingual immigrant students: A holistic tri-directional approach. Modern Language Journal, 99(4).
39. Halliday, M.A.K. (2007). The notion of “context” in language education (1991). In J. J. Webster (Ed.), The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Vol. 9, Language and education (pp. 269–290). London: Continuum.
40. Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 125–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.006
41. Hulstjin, I., Young, R.F., & Ortega, L. (Guest Eds.) (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 361–421. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263114000035
42. Kubanyiova, M., & Crookes, G. (2016). Re-envisioning the roles and tasks of language teachers in the post-centenary era of modern language education research. Modern Language Journal, 100-S.
43. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 365–377). New York, NY: Routledge.
44. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1993). The name of the task and task of naming: Methodological aspects of task-based pedagogy. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice ((pp. 69–96). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
45. Lantolf, J.P. (2005). Sociocultural and second language learning research: an exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), The handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 335–353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Reflecting on the cognitive–social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, S-1, 773–787. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00668.x
47. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). New York: Routledge.
48. Leow, R.P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557–584. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100004046
49. Long. M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511667299.002
50. Long, M.H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27–56. DOI: 10.2307/3587368
51. Martin, J.R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing: A reader (pp. 21–30). Geelong, VIC, Australia: Deakin University Press.
52. Martin, J.R. (1985). Process and text. Two aspects of human semiosis. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (pp. 243–274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53. Martin, J.R. (1991). Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics, 1, 99–162. DOI: 10.1080/10350339109360331
54. Martin, J.R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003
55. Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2009). Meaning in the making: Meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Language Learning, 59, S-1, 206–229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00541.x
56. MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession 2007, 234–245. DOI: 10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.234
57. Perspectives (2013). Proficiency benchmarks and tests for K–12 world language educators. Modern Language Journal, 97, 652–673.
58. Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In B.VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137–154) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2010). Towards mastering the discourses of reasoning: Use of grammatical metaphor at advanced levels of foreign language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 181–197. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01016.x
60. Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources: Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 243–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.011
61. Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2013). Preparing graduate student teachers for advanced content-based instruction: Exploring content through grammatical metaphor. In H. Willis Allen & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Educating the future FL professoriate for the 21st century (pp. 82–104). Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
62. Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H. (2013). Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179–197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.009
63. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
64. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
65. Schleppegrell, M.J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Schleppegrell, M.J., & O’Hallaron, C.L. (2011). Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 3–18. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190511000067
67. Schmidt, R.W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. DOI: 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
68. Schmidt, R.W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
69. Sprang, K.A. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition and advanced learners: The role of grammaticization and conceptual organization in the acquisition of German verbs with inseparable prefixes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
70. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
71. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. VanPatten, B. (Ed.) (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Van den Branden, K. (Ed.) (2006). Task-based language education. From theory to practive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511667282
74. Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.M. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In K. van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 2–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tblt.1.02van
75. Verspoor, M., & Smiskova, H. (2012). Foreign language writing development from a dynamic usage-based perspective. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 17–47). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
76. Widdowson, H. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Wiggins, G.P., & McTighe, J. (1998/2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
78. Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.