Sociocultural and second language learning research: An exegesis1

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 335-353

  Lantolf, James P ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084867542     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-29     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78,465-483.
2. Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 525-545.
3. Ball, A. F. (2000). Teachers' developing philosophies on literacy and their use in urban schools: A Vygotskian perspective on internal activity and teacher change. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 226-255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Belz, J. (in press). Language learning in immigration: The literary testimonies of Werner Lansburgh.
5. Broner, M. A., & Tarone, E. E. (2001). Is it fun? Language play in a fifth grade Spanish immersion classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 363-379.
6. Carpay, J. A. M. (1974). Foreign-language teaching and meaningful learning. A Soviet Russian point of view. ITL, 25-26,161-187.
7. Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence. The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
8. Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: how language augments human computation. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162-183). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cobb, P. (1998). Learning from distributed theories of intelligence. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 5,187-204.
10. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
11. Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. (1994). Same task different activity: analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173-194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. deGuerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Krashen's i + land Vygotsky's ZPD: Really two very different notions. TESOL-Gram (The Official Newsletter of Puerto Rico TESOL), 23, 9.
13. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27-50). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Dunn, W. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (1998). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Krashen's i + 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 411-442.
16. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, R-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Fodor, J. (1980). On the impossibility of acquiring –more powerful— structures. In M. Piatelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning. The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 142-162). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6,19-44.
21. Gal'perin, P. Ia. (1992). Linguistic consciousness and some questions of the relationship between language and thought. The Journal of Russian and East European Psychology,30, 81-92.
22. Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23. Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 155-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Hopper, P. (2002, July 10). Emergent grammar: Gathering together the fragments. Plenary lecture presented at the Summer Institute in Applied Linguistics, The Pennsylvania State University.
25. Kasper, G. (1997). –A— stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 307-312.
26. Karpova, S. N. (1977). The realization of the verbal composition of speech by preschool children. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
27. Kinginger, C. (2001). i + = ZPD. Foreign Language Annals, 34,417-425.
28. Kinginger, C. (2002). Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics, 23, 240-261.
29. Komarova, L. (1988). The teaching strategy –A-K— * and its effect upon the appropriation of foreign language knowledge and ability. Learning Activity, 1, 21-28.
30. Komarova, L. (1991). Ein alternativer Weg des schulischen Fremdsprachenerwerbs. Empirische Pädagogik, 5,47-61.
31. Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky's psychology. A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Lantolf, J. P. (2000a). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1-26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Lantolf, J. P. (2000b). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 30(2), 79-98.
34. Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000c). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Lantolf, J. P. (2002). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 104-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Lantolf, J. P. (2003). Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the language classroom. In A. Kozulin, V. Ageev, S. Miller, & B. Grindis (Eds.), Vygotsky's theory of education in cultural context(pp. 349-370). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lantolf, J. P., & Aljaafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 619-632.
38. Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
39. Lantolf, J. P., & Genung, P. B. (2002). –I'd rather switch than fight:— An activity-theoretic study of power, success and failure in a foreign language classroom. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization. Ecological perspectives (pp. 175-196). London: Continuum.
40. Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15,108-124.
41. Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (in press). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Lantolf, J. P., & Yanez-Prieto, M.-C. (2003). Talking into yourself in Spanish: Private speech and second language learning. Hispania, 86, 98-105.
43. Lave, J. (1997). What's special about experiments as contexts for thinking." In M. Cole, Y. Engestrm, O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture and activity. Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 57-69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Leon, G. F. (2001). Toward a hermeneutical reconstruction of Gal'perin's theory of learning. In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 260-282). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
45. Leontiev, A. A. (1981). Psychology and the language learning process. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
46. Leontiev, D. (Date). The phenomenon of meaning: How psychology can make sense of it. Unpublished manuscript.
47. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. (Rev. Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.
49. Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind. A personal account of Soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Markova, A. K. (1979). The teaching and mastery of language. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
51. Minick, N. (1997). The early history of the Vygotskian school: The relationship between mind and activity. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrm, & L. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity. Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 117-127). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Edward Arnold.
53. Nassaji, H., & M. Swain. (2000). A Vygotskyan perspective towards corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random vs. negotiated help on the acquisition of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 3451.
54. Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to the teaching-learning of second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
55. Newman, D., Griffin, P, & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56. Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky. Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.
57. Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1996). Unscientific psychology. A cultural-performatory approach to understanding human life. Westport, CT: Praeger.
58. Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1997). The end of knowing: A new developmental way of learning. London: Rout-ledge.
59. Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom. Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In J. P. Lantolf, (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155-178). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development. Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
62. Platt, E. J., & Brooks, F. B. (1994). The –acquisition-rich environment— revisited. The Modern Language Journal, 78,497-511.
63. Platt, E. J., & Brooks, F. B. (2002). Task engagement: A turning point in foreign language development. Language Learning, 52,364-399.
64. Roebuck, R. (1998). Reading and recall in L1 and L2: A sociocultural approach. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
65. Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Saville-Troike, M. (1988). Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the –silent period.— Journal of Child Language, 15, 567-590.
67. Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Unresolved tensions in sociocultural theory: Analogies with contemporary sociological debates. Culture & Psychology, 8, 283-305.
68. Scribner, S. (1985). Vygotsky's use of history. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition. Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119-146). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Schinke-Llano, L. (1995). Reenvisioning the second language classroom: A Vygotskian approach. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 21-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70. Slobin, D. I. (1996). From –thought and language— to –thinking for speaking.— In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71. Smith, W. A. (1922). The reading process. New York: Macmillan.
72. Stetsenko, A. P. (1999). Social interaction, cultural tools and the zone of proximal development: In search of a synthesis. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural historical approaches (pp. 235-252). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
73. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82,320-337.
75. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research.
76. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (in press). –Oh, I get itnow!— From production to comprehension in second language learning. In D. M. Brinton & O. Kagan (Eds.), Heritage language acquisition: A new field emerging. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. Talyzina, N. (1981). The psychology of learning. Moscow: Progress Press.
78. Thorne, S. L. (1999). An activity theoretical analysis of foreign language electronic discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
79. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 38-67.
80. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81. Tulviste, P. (1991). The Cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishing.
82. van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. A quest for synthesis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
83. Van Oers, B. (1998). The fallacy of decontextualization. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 5,135-142.
84. Vocate, D. R. (1994). Self-talk and inner speech: Understanding the uniquely human aspects of intrapersonal communication. In D. R. Vocate (Ed.), Intrapersonal communication. Different voices, different minds(pp. 3-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
85. Volosinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univeristy Press.
86. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (Newly revised & edited by A. Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works ofL. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1. The problems of general psychology. Including the volume Thinking and Speech. New York: Plenum.
89. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 233-344). New York: Plenum.
90. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Toward a sociocultual practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
91. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
93. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
94. Yaroshevsky, M. (1989). Lev Vygotsky. Moscow: Progress Press.