A complexity theory approach to second language development/ acquisition

Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 48-72

  Larsen Freeman, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921315458     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 86, 525-545.
2. Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 169-188.
3. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
4. Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 153-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
6. Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schonemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, Supplement 1, 1-27.
7. Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
9. Byrne, D. (2002). Interpreting quantitative data. London: Sage.
10. Caspi, T. (2010). A dynamic perspective on second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Netherlands.
11. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book. Boston, MA: Heinle/Cengage.
12. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26-58.
13. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (Eds.) (2001). Connectionist psycholinguistics. Westport, CO: Ablex.
14. Cilliers, P. (2001). Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 135-147.
15. Cilliers, P. (2005). Knowledge, limits and boundaries. Futures, 37, 605-613.
16. Cilliers, P. (2008). Knowing complex systems: The limits of understanding. In F. Darbellay, M. Cockell, J. Billotte, & F. Waldvogel (Eds.), A vision of transdiciplinarity (pp. 43-50). Lausanne: EPFL Press & CRC Press.
17. Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Cook, V. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence. Second Language Research, 7, 103-117.
19. Cooper, D. (1999). Linguistic attractors: The cognitive dynamics of language acquisition and change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
20. Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-170.
21. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7-21.
22. Dörnyei, Z. (2009a). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Dörnyei, Z. (2009b). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59, Supplement 1, 237-255.
24. Doughty, C., & Long, M. (Eds.) (2003). Handbook of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25. Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245-258.
26. Elio, R., & Anderson, J. R. (1981). The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 397-417.
27. Elio, R., & Anderson, J. R. (1984). The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition, 12, 20-30.
28. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
29. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-31.
30. Ellis, N. C. (with Larsen-Freeman, D.) (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59, Supplement 1, 93-128.
31. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370-386.
32. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27, 558-589.
33. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Epstein, J. (2008, July). Why model? Keynote address to the Second World Congress on Social Simulation, George Mason University, Washington, DC.
35. Feldman, J. (2006). From molecule to metaphor. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Books.
36. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin Books.
37. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289-316.
38. Haggis, T. (2008). Knowledge must be contextual: Exploring some possible implications of complexity and dynamic systems theories for educational research. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 40, 159-176.
39. Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
40. st European Conference on System Science (AFCET, Paris), 23-32.
41. Heylighen, F. (2008). Complexity and self-organization. In M. J. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, Vol. 2 (pp. 1215-1224). Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
42. Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 155-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Jessner, U. (2008). A DST model of multilingualism and the role of metalinguistic awareness. Modern Language Journal, 92, 270-283.
44. Keller, R. (1985). Toward a theory of linguistic change. In T. Ballmer (Ed.), Linguistics dynamics: Discourses, procedures and evolution. (pp. 212-237). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
45. Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization. London: Continuum.
46. Kramsch, C. (2008). Ecological perspectives on foreign language education. Language Teacher, 41, 389-408.
47. Kramsch, C. (2009). Third culture and language education. In L. Wei & V. Cook (Eds.), Continuum contemporary applied linguistics (233-254). London: Continuum.
48. Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29, 645-671.
49. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning, 26, 125-134.
50. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141-165.
51. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002a). The grammar of choice. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching (pp. 105-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002b). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 36-44). London: Continuum.
53. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle/Cengage.
54. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006a). Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end, and there is no state. In Z.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 189-200). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
55. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006b). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590-619.
56. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2008). On the need for a new understanding of language and its development. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 281-304.
57. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). Having and doing: Learning from a complexity theory perspective. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp. 52-68). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
58. Larsen-Freeman, D. (forthcoming). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching.
59. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008a). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008b). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 200-213.
61. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
62. Larsen-Freeman, D., Lowie, W., & Schmid, M. (in press). Introduction. In M. Schmid & W. Lowie (Eds.), Modelling bilingualism: From structure to chaos. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63. Leather, J., & van Dam, J. (Eds.) (2003). Ecology of language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
64. Lemke, J. (2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 68-87). London: Continuum.
65. Leopold, W. (1939-1949). Speech development of a bilingual child. Northwestern University Studies in the Humanities, Evanston, IL.
66. Lewontin R. (1998). The evolution of cognition: Questions we will never answer. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science, Vol. 4: Methods, models, and conceptual Issues (pp. 107-132). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Lorenz, E. (1972, December). Predictability: Does the flap of a butterfly's wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? Paper presented at The American Association for the Advancement of Sciences, Washington, DC.
68. Macqueen, S. M. (2009). The emergence of patterns in second language writing: A sociocognitive exploration of lexical trails. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne.
69. MacWhinney, B. (2006). Emergentism: Use often and with care. Applied Linguistics, 27, 729-740.
70. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1972). Autopoiesis and cognition. Boston, MA: Reidel.
71. McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11 113-128.
72. Meara, P. (2006). Emergent properties of multilingual lexicons. Applied Linguistics, 27, 620-644.
73. Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1999). Authority in language (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
74. Mitchell, S. (2003). Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
76. Osberg, D. (2007, April). Emergence: A complexity-based critical logic for education? Paper presented at the Complex Criticality in Educational Research colloquium of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
77. Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students' independent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 384-419.
78. Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. McClelland, D. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
80. Semetsky, I. (2008). On the creative logic of education, or re-reading Dewey through the lens of complexity science. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 40, 83-95.
81. Slobin, D. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking." In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
82. Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83. Thelen, E., & Corbetta, D. (2002). Microdevelopment and dynamic systems: Applications to infant motor development. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment (pp. 59-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Thompson, E., & Varela, F. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 418-425.
86. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215-228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
88. van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640-672). London: Sage.
89. van Gelder, T., & Port, R. (1995). It's about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 1-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
91. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & de Bot, K. (2008). Input and second language development from a dynamic perspective. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 77-88). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
93. Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 214-231.
94. von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline for general systems theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 12, 134-165.
95. Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity. American Scientist, 36, 536-544.
96. Whiteside, A. (in press). Using dynamic systems/complexity theory in linguistic data analysis: A language ecology approach to the study of individual and social process. In L. Cooker & P. Benson (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Sociocultural approaches to autonomy, agency, and identity. London: Equinox.
97. Zipf, G. K. (1935). The Psycho-biology of language. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.