Individual Differences: Tools for Theory Testing and Understanding in Consumer Psychology Research

Handbook of Consumer Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 1161-1176

  Haugtvedt, Curtis P ^a   Liu, Kaiya ^a   Min, Kyeong Sam ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145865818     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809570-59     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Ames, D. R., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Appraising the unusual: Framing effects and moderators of uniquenessseeking and social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 271-282.
2. Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fi t affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research,43, 1-10.
3. Baumgartner, H. (2002). Toward a personology of the consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 286-292.
4. Baumgartner, H., Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, M. (1992). Autobiographical memories, affect, and consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 53-82.
5. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
6. Brock, T. C. (1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.). Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 243-275). New York: Academic Press.
7. Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1989). Self-referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 628-638.
8. Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1995). Effects of self-referencing on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 17-26.
9. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
10. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The effi cient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
11. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
12. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67, 319-333.
13. Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fi t and persuasion: Transfer from ‘feeling right’.“Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388-404.
14. De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction:need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346-365.
15. Drolet, A. (2002). Inherent rule variability in consumer choice: Changing rules for change’s sake. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 293-305.
16. Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1995). Persuasion knowledge - Lay peoples and researchers beliefs about the psychology of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 62-74.
17. Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 773-794.
18. Gregory, W. L., Cialdini, R. B., & Carpenter, K. M. (1982). Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 89-99.
19. Haugtvedt, C. P. (1994, February). Individual differences in propensity to self-reference: Implications for attitude change processes. Paper presented at the 1st Winter Meeting of the Society for Consumer Psychology, St. Petersburg, FL.
20. Haugtvedt, C. P., Kasmer, J. A.,Samuelsen, B., Hansen, H., & Lorentzen, B. (2004, July). An elaboration likelihood model analysis of consumer satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, Hawaii.
21. Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 239-260.
22. Haugtvedt, C. P., Shakarchi, R, & Jarvis, B. (2002). Propensity to self-reference and attitude change processes. Working paper, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University.
23. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologists, 53, 1280-1300.
24. Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology,31, 3-23.
25. Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 515-525.
26. Higgins, E. T., & Spiegel, S. (2004). Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.). Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 171-187). New York: Guilford.
27. Hirt, E. R., Kardes, F. R., & Markman, K. D. (2004). Activating a mental simulation mind-set through generation of alternatives: Implications for debiasing in related and unrelated domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 374-383.
28. Iacobucci, D. (Ed.). (2001). Special issue: Methodological and statistical concerns of the experimental behavioral researcher. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10, 48-53.
29. Jarvis, B., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172-194.
30. Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L., Kellaris, J. J., & Posavac, S. S. (2004). Selective information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 368-374.
31. Kassarjian, H. (1971). Personality and consumer behavior: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 409-418.
32. Kassarjian, H., & Sheffet, M. J. (1981). Personality and consumer behavior: An update. In H. Kassarjian & T. Robertson(Eds.), Perspectiveson consumer behavior (pp. 160-180). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
33. Kassarjian, H., & Sheffet, M. J. (1991). Personality and consumer behavior: An update. In H. Kassarjian & T. Robertson(Eds.), Perspectiveson consumer behavior (pp. 281-303). Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Keller, P. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and effi cacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 109-114.
35. Kim, H., & Drolet, A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 373-382.
36. Klein, C. T. F., & Webster, D. M. (2000). Individual differences in argument scrutiny as motivated by need for cognitive closure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 119-129.
37. Kruglanski, A. W., & Chun, W. Y. (in press). Motivated closed mindedness and its social consequences. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.). Handbook of motivation science. New York: Guilford.
38. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
39. Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The infl uence of regulatory fi t on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86, 205-218.
40. Lee, H., Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, C. (1999). Motivated search: Effects of choice, accountability, issue involvement, and prior knowledge on information acquisition and use. Journal of Business Research, 45, 75-88.
41. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,76, 149-188.
42. Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing,8, 43-57.
43. Lynn, M. (1992). The psychology of unavailability: Explaining scarcity and cost effects on value. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 3-7.
44. Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology and Marketing,14, 601-616.
45. Lynn, M., & Snyder, C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In L. Michael & C. R. Snyder(Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395-410). New York: Oxford University Press.
46. MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.
47. McAdams, D. P. (1996). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: Guilford.
48. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The person: An integrated introduction to personality psychology. Fort Worth: TX:Hartcourt College Publishers.
49. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
50. O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantage of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Communication Yearbook,30, 1-43.
51. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology,43, 87-131.
52. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
53. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness:The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146.
54. Petty, R. E., & Jarvis, B. G. (1996). An individual differences perspective on assessing cognitive processes. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman(Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 221-257). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C., & Nicewander, W. A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods,10, 178-192.
56. Roets, A. Van Hiel, A., & Cornelis, I. (2006). The dimensional structure of the need for cognitive closure scale:Relationships with “seizing” and “freezing” processes. Social Cognition, 24, 22-45.
57. Schlosser, A. E. (2005). Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context, Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 260-265.
58. Shavitt, S., & Brock, T. C. (1986). Self-relevant responses to commercial persuasion: Field and experimental tests. In K. Sentis & J. Olson(Eds.), Advertising and consumer psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 149-171). New York: Praeger.
59. Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy * value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73, 447-458.
60. Sherman, D. K., Mann, T., & Updegraff, J. A. (2006). Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion,30, 165-169.
61. Silvera, D. H., Kardes, F. R., & Harvey, N. (2005). Contextual influences on omission neglect in the fault tree paradigm. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 117-126.
62. Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role ofexplanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49-68.
63. Snyder, C. R. (1992). Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel?Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 9-24
64. Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518-527.
65. Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
66. Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. (4th ed., pp. 635-679). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
67. Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith(Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393-400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Sujan, M., Bettman, J. R., & Baumgartner, H. (1993). Infl uencing consumer judgments via autobiographical memories: A self-referencing perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 422-436.
69. Swann, W. B., & Seyle, C. (2005). Personality psychology’s comeback and its emerging symbiosis with social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 155-165.
70. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
71. Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388-398.
72. Tetlock, P. E., Lerner, J. S., & Boettger, R. (1996). The dilution effect: Judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 915-934.
73. Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability:Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632 640.
74. Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 50-66.
75. Wang, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 28-38.
76. Webster, D. M. (1993). Motivated augmentation and reduction of the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65, 261-271.
77. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
78. Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 181-195.