Contextual influences on omission neglect in the fault tree paradigm

Journal of Consumer Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 117-126

  Silvera, David H ^a   Kardes, Frank R ^b   Harvey, Nigel ^c   Cronley, Maria L ^d   Houghton, David C ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18744406771     PISSN: 10577408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1502_4     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. San Diego, CA: Academic.
2. Barlow, R. E., & Lambert, A. E. (1975). Introduction to fault tree analysis. In R. E. Barlow, J. B. Fussell, & N. D. Singpurwalla (Eds.), Reliability and fault tree analysis: Theoretical and applied aspects of system reliability and safety assessment (pp. 7-36). Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
3. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 319-330.
4. Brooke, P. J., & Paige, R. F. (2003). Fault trees for security design and analysis. Computers and Security, 22, 256-264.
5. Dube-Rioux, L., & Russo, J. E. (1988). An availability bias in professional judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1, 223-237.
6. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 330-344.
7. Fox, C. R., & Weber, M. (2002). Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance, and decision context. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 476-498.
8. Gibson, B., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Posavac, S. S. (1997). Focal bias, probability overestimation, and gambling choice: The influence of biased hypothesis testing on subsequent judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 126-142.
9. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 95-113). New York: Academic.
11. Hirt, E. R., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Probability and category identification in the fault tree paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 112-131.
12. Hirt, E. R., Kardes, F. R., & Markman, K. D. (2004). Activating a mental simulation mind-set through generation of alternatives: Implications for debiasing in related and unrelated domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 374-383.
13. Hu, W., Starr, A. G., & Leung, A. Y. T. (2003). Operational fault diagnosis of manufacturing systems. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 133, 108-117.
14. Hwang, H. H. M., & Chou, T. (1998). Evaluation of seismic performance of an electric substation using event tree/fault tree technique. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 13, 117-124.
15. Johnson, R. D., Rennie, R. D., & Wells, G. L. (1991). Outcome trees and baseball: A study of expertise and list-length effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 324-340.
16. Kaplan, M. F. (1981). Amount of information and polarity of attraction. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 23-26.
17. Kardes, F. R., & Gurumurthy, K. (1992). Order-of-entry effects on consumer memory and judgment: An information integration perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 343-357.
18. Kardes, F. R., & Sanbonmatsu, D. M. (1993). Direction of comparison, expected feature correlation, and the set-size effect in preference judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 39-54.
19. Khan, F. I., & Abbasi, S. A. (2000). Analytical simulation and PROFAT II: A new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 75, 1-27.
20. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
21. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
22. Kunda, Z. ( 1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
23. Martin, L. L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.
24. McKenzie, C. R. M. (1999). (Non)complementary updating of belief in two hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 27, 152-165.
25. Newman, J., Wolff, J. T., & Hearst, E. (1980). The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 630-650.
26. Ofir, C. (2000). Ease of recall vs recalled evidence in judgment: Experts vs laymen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 28-42.
27. O'Guinn, T. C., & Shrum, I. J. (1997). The role of television in the construction of social reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 278-294.
28. Russo, J. E., & Kolzow, K. J. (1994). Where is the fault in fault trees? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 263-283.
29. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., & Herr, P. M. (1992). The role of prior knowledge and missing information in multiattribute evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 76-91.
30. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., Ho, E. A., Houghton, D. C., & Posavac, S. S. (2003). Overestimating the importance of the given information in multiattribute consumer judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 289-300.
31. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., Posavac, S. S., & Houghton, D. C. (1997). Contextual influences on judgment based on limited information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 251-264.
32. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., & Sansone, C. (1991). Remembering less and inferring more: The effects of timing of judgment on inferences about unknown attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 546-554.
33. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Posavac, S. S., Kardes, F. R., & Mantel, S. P. (1998). Selective hypothesis testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 197-220.
34. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Posavac, S. S., & Stasny, R. (1997). The subjective beliefs underlying probability overestimation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 276-295.
35. Schwarz, N. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87-99.
36. Showers, C., & Cantor, N. (1985). Social cognition: A look at motivated strategies. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 375-305.
37. Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547-567.
38. Vesely, W. E., Goldberg, F. F., Roberts, N. H., & Haash, D. F. (1981). Fault tree handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
39. Walker, I. D., & Cavallaro, J. R. (1996). Failure mode analysis for a hazardous waste clean-up manipulator. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 53, 277-290.
40. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
41. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., & Belli, R. F. (1998). The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments. Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events. Psychological Science, 9, 46-48.
42. Wyer, R. S. (2004). Social comprehension and judgment. The role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
43. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Yamagishi, T., & Hill, T. C. (1983). Initial impression versus missing information as explanations of the set-size effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 942-951.
45. Zeigarnik, B. (1938). On finished and unfinished tasks. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A sourcebook of gestalt psychology (pp. 300-314). New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.