On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 181-195

  Webster, Donna M ^b   Richter, Linda ^b   Kruglanski, Arie W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030539623     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1996.0009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
2. Baron, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1181.
3. Bechtold, A., Naccarato, M. E. and Zanna, M. P. (1986). Need for structure and the prejudice-discrimination link. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association. Toronto, Ontario.
4. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological-Science, 1(5), 319-322.
5. Eagly, A. H. and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
6. Ford, T. E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (in press). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
7. Freund, T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Shpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: Effects of the need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 479-487.
8. Heaton, A. W. and Kruglanski, A. W. (1991). Person perception by introverts and extroverts under time-pressure: Effects of need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 161-165.
9. Higgins, E. T., & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Khilstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Higgins, E. T., King, G. A., & Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 35-47.
11. Hull, J. G., Tedie, J. C. and Lehn, D. A. (1992). Moderator variables in personality research: The problem of controlling for plausible alternatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 115-117.
12. Jamieson, D. W., & Zanna, M. P. (1989). Need for structure in attitude formation and expression. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Kanause, D. E. and Hanson, L. R., Jr. (1972). Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanause, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.). Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
14. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
15. Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social cognitive psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 181-197.
16. Kruglanski, A. W. (in press). A motivated gatekeeper of our minds: Need for closure effects on interpersonal phenomena. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.). Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. (Vol. 3). New York: Guilford.
17. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences:Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
18. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 212-225.
19. Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M. and Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
20. Lichtenstein, M., & Srull, T. K. (1987). Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 93-118.
21. Luchins, A. S. (1957). Experimental attempts to minimize the impact of first impressions. In C. E. Hovland (Ed.), The order of presentation in persuasion. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
22. Mayseless, O. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 162-183.
23. Miller, N. & Campbell, D. T. (1958). Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 1-9.
24. Offner, M. (1911). Mental fatigue. Baltimore: Warwick & York.
25. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
26. Sanbomatsu, D. M. and Fazio, R. H. (1990). The role of attitudes and memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 614-622.
27. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(4), 285-292.
28. Thayer, R. E. (1967). Measurement of activation through self report. Psychological Reports, 20, 663-678.
29. Thayer, R. E. (1978). Toward a psychological theory of multidimensional activation (arousal). Motivation and Emotion, 2, 1-34.
30. Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1994). Systematic processing and the debasing of covert primacy effects in impression formation: Unshackling the motivated perceiver from the constraints of accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474-489.