Learning, Change, and Power: Competing Frames of Technology and Literacy

Handbook of Research on New Literacies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 215-240

  Warschauer, Mark ^a   Ware, Paige ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145148962     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410618894-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (106)

1. Attewell, P., and Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15(1), 1-10.
2. Attewell, P., and Winston, H. (2003). Children of the digital divide. In P. Attewell and N. M. Seel (Eds.), Disadvantaged teens and computer technologies (pp. 117-136). Munster, Germany: Waxmann.
3. Ba, H., Tally, W., and Tsikalas, K. (2002). Investigating children’s emerging digital literacies. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(4).
4. Baron, D. (1999). From pencils to pixels: The stages of literacy technologies. In G. E. Hawisher, and C. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 15-33). Logan: Utah State University Press.
5. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51).
6. Belson, K. (2005, June 21). Dial-up Internet going way of mobile phones. New York Times.
7. Bleha, T. (2005). Down to the wire. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.foreignaffairs. org/20050501 faessay84311-p0/thomas-bleha/down-to-the-wire.html
8. Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Brown, K. R., Cummins, J., and Sayers, D. (2007). Literacy, technology, and diversity: Teaching for success in changing times. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10. Castells, M. (1996/2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden, MA:Blackwell.
11. Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12. Castells, M. (1998/2000). End of millennium (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
13. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56, 458-464.
14. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
15. Cook, T. D., Appleton, H., Conner, R., Shaffer, A., Tamkin, G., and Weber, S. J. (1975). “Sesame Street” revisited. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
16. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in classrooms, 1980-2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Cummins, J. (1989). Empowering minority students. Sacramento: California Association for Bilingual Education.
19. Cummins, J., and Sayers, D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illiteracy through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
20. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
21. Fang, X., and Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and curricular reform in China: A case study. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 301-323.
22. Fuchs, T., and Woessmann, L. (2004). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school (CESIFO Working Paper No. 1321). Munich, Germany: Center for Economic Studies at the University of Munich.
23. Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach up about learning and literacy. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
25. Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
26. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., and Cook, A. (2004). The effect of computers on student writing:A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 3-51.
27. Griffin, P., and Cole, M. (1987). New technologies, basic skills, and the underside of education:What’s to be done? In J. Langer (Ed.), Language, literacy, and culture: Issues of society and schooling (pp. 199-231). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Gulek, J. C., and Demirtas, H. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2).
29. Hagood, M. (2003). New media and online literacies: No age left behind. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 387-392.
30. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4).
31. Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production and knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2(1), 39-53.
32. Holloway, D., and Green, L. (2003). Sesame Street effect: Work, study, play and the family internet. Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Communications Association Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
33. Hull, G. (2003). AT LAST: Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229-233.
34. Hull, G., and Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multmodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224-261.
35. Hull, G., and Schultz, K. (Eds.). (2002). School’s out!: Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. International ICT Literacy Panel. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy.Retrieved February 28, 2005, from http://www.ets.org/research/ictliteracy/ictreport. pdf
37. Ito, M., and Okabe, D. (2005a). Intimate connections: Contextualizing Japanese youth and mobile messaging. In R. Harper, L. Palen, and A. Taylor (Eds.), The inside text: Social, cultural, and design perspectives on SMS (pp.127-143). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38. Ito, M., and Okabe, D. (2005b). Technosocial situations: Emergent structuring of mobile email use. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, and M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 257-276). Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.
39. Jeroski, S. (2004). Implementation of the wireless writing program: Phase 3. Retrieved June 21, 2005, from http://www.prn.bc.ca/WWP_Report04.pdf
40. Karchmer, R. (2001). The journey ahead: Thirteen teachers report how the Internet influences literacy and literacy instruction in their K-12 classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 442-466.
41. Kelly, T., Gray, V., and Minges, M. (2003). Broadband Korea: Internet case study. Geneva, Switzerland: International Telecommunications Union.
42. Kress, G. (1998). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication:The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53-79). Routledge: London.
43. Kress, G. (1999). “English” at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual. In G. E. Hawisher, and C. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 66-88). Logan: Utah State University Press.
44. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
45. Kress, G., and Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London:Routledge.
46. Kress, G., and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
47. Labbo, L. D., and Reinking, D. (1999). Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478-492.
48. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
49. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Second language literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly (34), 457-482.
50. Lam, W. S. E. (2003). Second language literacy and identify formation on the Internet. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
51. Lam, W. S. E. (2005a). Re-envisioning language literacy and the immigrant subject in new mediascapes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
52. Lam, W. S. E. (2005b). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room. Language Learning and Technology, 8(3), 44-65.
53. Landow, G. P. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
54. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge in the classroom. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
55. Leander, K. (2008). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 33-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, and R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology:Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Leu, D. J., Karchmer, R., and Leu, D. D. (1999). Exploring literacy on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 52(6), 636-642.
58. Leu, D., and Kinzer, C. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
59. Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., and Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell and N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1568-1611). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
60. Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E., and Thumim, N. (2008). Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies: Disciplinary, critical, and methodological issues. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 103-132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Lowood, H. (2005). Real-time performance: Machina and game studies. The International Digital Media and Arts Association Journal, 2(1), 10-17.
62. Luke, A., and Freebody, P. (1999). A map of possible practices: Further notes on the four resources model. Practically Primary, 4(2), 5-8.
63. Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality, and interdisciplinarity. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 297-314.
64. Mackey, M. (2003). Researching new forms of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 403-407.
65. McNamee, G. D., and Sivright, S. (2002). Community supports for writing development among urban African American children. In G. Hull, and K. Schultz (Eds.), School’s out: Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice (pp. 169-197). New York: Teachers College Press.
66. Morrell, E., and Duncan-Andrade, J. (2004). What youth do learn in school: Using hip-hop as a bridge to canonical poetry. In J. Mahiri (Ed.), What they don’t learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth (pp. 248-268). New York: Peter Lang.
67. Murray, J. H. (1998). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68. Nelson, M. E. (2006). Mode, meaning, and synesthesia in multimedia L2 writing. Language Learning and Technology, 10(2), 56-76.
69. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
70. Nielsen/Net Ratings. (2004). Three out of four Americans have access to the Internet, according to Nielsen Net Ratings. Retrieved June 21, 2005, from http://direct.www. nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_040318.pdf
71. Nixon, H. (2003). New research literacies for contemporary research into literacy and new media? Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 407-414.
72. O’Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., Bebell, D., and Tucker-Seeley, K. R. (2005). Examining the relationship between home and school computer use and students’ English/language arts test scores. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(3). Retrieved August 11, 2006, from http://www.jtla.org
73. Paterson, W. A., Henry, J. J., O’Quin, K., Ceprano, M. A., and Blue, E. (2003). Investigating the effectiveness of an integrated learning system on early emergent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(2), 172-207.
74. Pearce, C. (2002). Emergent authorship: The next ineractive revolution. Computers and Graphics, 26, 21-29.
75. Reardon, M. (2005). China to trump U.S. in broadband subscribers. Retrieved June 21, 2005, from http://news.zdnet.com/2100-6005_22-5695591.html
76. Renaissance Learning. (2004). Accelerated reader. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.
77. Russell, M., and Abrams, L. (2004). Instructional effects of computers for writing: The effect of state testing programs. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1332-1357.
78. Russell, M., Bebell, D., and Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 313-330.
79. Russell, M., Higgins, J., and Hoffman, T. (2004). Examining the effect of text editor and robust word processor on student writing performance (inTASC Publications). Boston:Lynch School of Education.
80. Russell, M., and Plati, T. (2002). Does it matter with what I write?: Comparing performance on paper, computer and portable writing devices. Current Issues in Education, 5(4), 2-27.
81. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., and Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
82. Seiter, E. (2004). Children reporting online: The cultural politics of the computer lab. Television and New Media, 5(2), 87-107.
83. Seiter, E. (2005). The Internet playground: Children’s access, entertainment, and miseducation. New York: Peter Lang.
84. Shetzer, H., and Warschauer, M. (2000). An electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer, and R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching:Concepts and practice (pp. 171-185). New York: Cambridge University Press.
85. Shiu, E., and Lenhart, A. (2004). How Americans use instant messaging. Washington, DC:Pew Internet and American Life Project.
86. Slayton, J., and Llosa, L. (2002). Evaluation of the Waterford Early Reading Program 2001- 2002: Implementation and student achievement (Planning, Assessment and Research Division Publication No. 144). Los Angeles: Los Angeles Unified School District Program Evaluation and Research Branch.
87. Smolin, L. I., and Lawless, K. A. (2003). Becoming literate in the technological age: New responsibilities and tools for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 56, 570-577.
88. Sotamaa, O. (2003, December). Computer game modding, intermediality and participatory culture. Paper presented at the New Media? New Theories? New Methods? Conference, Sandbjerg, Denmark.
89. Steinkuehler, C. (2005). The literacy practices of massively multiplayer online games versus online standards. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
90. Steinkeuhler, C. (2008). Cognition and literacy in massively multiplayer online games. In D. Leu, C. Lankshear, M. Knobel, and J. Coiro (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 611-634). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Stigler, J. W., and Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
92. Street, B. (1995). Social literacies. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
93. Taylor, R. (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
94. Tuman, M. (1992). Word perfect: Literacy in the computer age. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
95. Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
96. Ware, P., and Warschauer, M. (2005). Hybrid literacy texts and practices in technology-intensive environments. International Journal of Educational Research.
97. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470-481.
98. Warschauer, M. (1998). Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 757-761.
99. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
100. Warschauer, M. (2000). Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the track. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(4).
101. Warschauer, M. (2003a). The allures and illusions of modernity: Technology and educational reform in Egypt. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(38).
102. Warschauer, M. (2003b). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York:Teachers College Press.
104. Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., and Stone, L. (2004). Technology and equity in schooling:Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy, 18(4), 562-588.
105. Warschauer, M., and Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 1-24.
106. Wright, C. (2003). Parking Lott: The role of Web logs in the fall of Sen. Trent Lott. Culture, Communication, and Technology Program, 3, 1-30.