Investigating the effectiveness of an integrated learning system on early emergent readers

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 172-207

  Paterson, Wendy A ^a   Henry, Julie Jacobs ^b   O'Quin, Karen ^a   Ceprano, Maria A ^a   Blue, Elfreda V ^c  

^a BUFFALO STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b CANISIUS COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10644283666     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.38.2.2     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ADAMS, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. BECKER, H.J. (1992). A model for improving the performance of integrated learning systems. Educational Technology, 32, 6-15.
3. BRAUNGER, J., & LEWIS, J. (1998). Building a knowledge base in reading. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory's Curriculum and Instruction Services.
4. BREWER, J., & HUNTER, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. BRUCE, B.C., & HOGAN, M.P. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D.R. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M.C. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Literacy for the 21st century: Technological transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 269-281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. CAMBOURNE, B. (1988). The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy in the classroom. Auckland, New Zealand: Ashton Scholastic.
7. CAMBOURNE, B. (1995). Toward an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning: Twenty years of inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 49, 182-190.
8. CARNEGIE CORPORATION. (1996). Years of promise: A comprehensive learning strategy for America's children. New York: Author.
9. CLAY, M.M. (1967). The reading behavior of 5-year old children: A research report. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2, 11-31.
10. CLAY, M.M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11. CLAY, M.M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. CLEMENTS, D.H (1985). Computers in early and primary education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. CLEMENTS, D.H. (1993). Early education principles and computer practices. In C G. Hass & F.W. Parkay (Eds.), Curriculum planning: A new approach (6th ed., pp. 6-10). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14. CLEMENTS, D H., & NASTASI, B.K. (1992). Computer and early childhood education. In M. Gettinger, S.N. Elliot, & T.R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Advances in school psychology: Preschool and early childhood treatment directions (pp. 187-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. CONANT, E.H. (1973). Teacher and paraprofessional work productivity. Washington, DC: Heath.
16. CUBAN, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. CUNNINGHAM, P M., & ALLINGTON, R.L. (1999). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write (2nd ed). New York: Longman.
18. DURKIN, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-535.
19. ESTEP, S.G., MCINERNY, W.D., VOCKELL, E., & KOSMOSKI, G. (1999). An investigation of the relationship between integrated learning systems and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28, 5-19.
20. GARNER, R., & GILLINGHAM, M.G. (1996). Internet communication in six classrooms: Conversations across time, space, and culture. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. GLASCOE, F.P. (1997). Technical report for the Brigance Screens. N. Billerica, MA. Curriculum Associates.
22. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
23. HEUSTON, D.H. (1996a). Background on reading research behind the Waterford Early Reading Program. Sandy, UT: Waterford Institute.
24. HEUSTON, D.H. (1996b), Power tools: An introduction to the Waterford Institute. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 706-707.
25. HILLIARD, A. (2000). The state of black education. Panel discussion at American Educational Research Association Convention, New Orleans, LA.
26. KAMIL, M.L., & LANE, D.M. (1998). Researching the relationship between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D.R. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M.C. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Literacy for the 21st century: Technological transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. KOZMA, R.B., & CRONINGER, R.G. (1992). Technology and the fate of at-risk students. Education and Urban Society, 24, 440-553.
28. LABBO, L.D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356-385.
29. LABBO, L.D., & REINKING, D. (1999). Theory and research into practice: Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478-492.
30. LINCOLN, Y.S., & GUBA, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31. MADDUX, CD., & WILLIS, J.W. (1992). Integrated learning systems and their alternatives: Problems and cautions. Educational Technology, 32, 51-57.
32. MAGEAU, T. (1990). ILS: Its new role in schools. Electronic Learning, 10, 22-24, 30-32.
33. MCCARRIER, A., PINNELL, G.S., & FOUNTAS, I. (2000). Interactive writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
34. MCDONALD, J., LYNCH, W., & KEARSLEY, G. (1996). Unfulfilled promises. American School Board Journal, 183, 26-28.
35. MEHLINGER, H.D. (1996). School reform in the information age. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 400-407.
36. MILES, M.B., & HUBERMAN, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. MILLER, L., & OLSON, J. (1994). Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 121-141.
38. MILLER, L., & OLSON, J. (1998). Literacy research oriented toward features of technology and classrooms. In D.R. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M.C. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 343-360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT. (2001). The New York State School district report card for XXXX City School District: An overview of academic performance. New York: University of the State of New York. [To preserve anonymity, XXXX replaces the name of the school district described in this article.]
40. OWENS, R.F., HESTER, J.L., & TEALE, W.H. (2002). Where do you want to go today? Inquiry-based learning and technology integration. The Reading Teacher, 55, 616-625.
41. REINKING, D., & PICKLE, M. (1993). Using a formative experiment to study how computers affect reading and writing in classrooms. In D.J. Leu & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice. 42nd yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 263-270). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
42. ROSENBLATT, L.M. (1978). The reader, the text, and the poem: The transactional theory of literacy work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
43. SARANGARM, S. (1991). The relationship between writing and reading achievement: The effectiveness of the writing to read program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.
44. SCHWANDT, T.A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. SHERRY, M. (1990). Implementing an integrated instructional system: Critical issues. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 118-120.
46. STANOVICH, K.E. (1986). Matthew Effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 360-406.
47. STRICKLAND, D.S., FEELEY, J.T., & WEPNER, S.B. (1987). Using computers in the teaching of reading. New York: Teachers College Press.
48. SULZBY, E. (1989). Assessment of writing and of children's language while writing. In L. Morrow & J. Smith (Eds.), The role of assessment and measurement in early literacy instruction (pp. 83-109). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
49. SULZBY, E., & TEALE, W. (1991). Emergent literacy In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 727-757). New York: Longman.
50. SUTHERLAND-SMITH, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy Web: Changes in reading from page to screen. The Reading Teacher, 55, 662-669.
51. TASHAKKORI, A., & TEDDLIE, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. TEALE, W.H., LEU, D.J., LABBO, L.D., & KINZER, C. (2002). Exploring literacy on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 55, 654-669.
53. TROTTER, A. (1990). Computer-learning The American School Board Journal, 777, 9-18.
54. VAN DUSEN, L.M., & WORTHEN, B.R. (1995). Can integrated instructional technology transform the classroom? Educational Leadership, 53, 28-33.
55. VENEZKY, R.L (1983). Evaluating computer-assisted instruction on its own cerms. In A.C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Classroom computers and cognitive science (pp. 31-49). New York: Academic Press.
56. VYGOTSKY, I. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. WEINFURT, K.P. (1995). Multivariate analysis of variance. In L.G. Grimm & P.R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 245-276). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
58. WEPNER, S.B., & TAO, L. (2002). From master teacher to master novice: Shifting responsibilities in technology-infused classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 55, 642-651.
59. WHITE, M.A. (1992). Are ILSs good education? Educational Technology, 32, 49-50.
60. WOOD, D., BRUNER, J.S., & ROSS, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
61. WRIGHT GROUP. (1999). The story box reading program assessment guide: Informing instruction for emergent learners. Bothell, WA: Author.
62. YADEN, D.B., Jr., ROWE, D.W., & MACGILLIVRAY, L. (2000). In M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 425-454). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.