Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 478-492

  Labbo, Linda D ^a   Reinking, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011939886     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.34.4.5     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. ADONI, H. (1995). Literacy and reading in a multimedia environment. Journal of Communication, 45(2), 52-74.
2. BECKER, H. (1991). How computers are used in the United States schools: Basic data from the 1989 I.E.A. Computers in Education Survey. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 385-406.
3. BECKER, H. (1993). Decision making about computer acquisition and use in American schools. Computers and Education, 20, 341-352.
4. BIRKERTS, S. (1995). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. New York: Fawcett.
5. BOLTER, J.D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [Also available as hypertext computer program.]
6. BOLTER, J.D., JOYCE, M., SMITH, J.B., & BERNSTEIN, M. (1993). Storyspace [Computer software]. Cambridge, MA: Eastgate Systems.
7. BORK, A. (1997). The future of computers and learning. T.H.E. Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 24, 1-13.
8. BOWERS, C.A. (1988). The cultural dimensions of educational computing: Understanding the non-neutrality of technology. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. BRUCE, B.C. (1997). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 289-309.
10. BRUCE, B.C., & HOGAN, M.P. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D.K. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Literacy for the 21st century: Technological transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 269-281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. BRUCE, B.C., & RUBIN, A. (1993). A situated evaluation of using computers for writing in classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. CAREY, A.R., & WORTHINGTON, K. (1997, November 6). Elementary computing. USA Today, p. 4D.
13. CHANG, L.L., & OSGUTHORPE, R.T. (1990). The effects of computerized picture-word processing on kindergartners' language development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5(1), 73-84.
14. CLARK, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.
15. CLEMENTS, D.H. (1994). The uniqueness of the computer as a learning tool: Insights from research and practice. In J.L. Wright & D.D. Shade (Eds.), Young children: Active learners in a technological age (pp. 31-49). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
16. CLEMENTS, D.H., & NASTASI, B.K. (1992). Computers and early childhood education. In M. Gettinger, S.N. Elliot, & T.R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Advances in school psychology: Preschool and early childhood treatment directions (pp. 187-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. COCHRAN-SMITH, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61, 107-155.
18. COCHRAN-SMITH, M., KAHN, J., & PARIS, C.L. (1990). When word processors come into the classroom. In J.L. Hoot & S.B. Silvern (Eds.), Writing with computers in the early grades (pp. 45-74). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. COOPER, M.M., & SELFE, C.L. (1990). Computer conferences and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English, 52, 847-869.
20. CUBAN, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. DAIUTE, C. (1985). Computers and writing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. DERTOUZOS, M. (1997). What will be. How the new world of information will change our lives. New York: HarperCollins.
23. DUFFY, G.G. (1994). How teachers think of themselves: A key to mindfulness. In J.N. Mangieri & C. Collins (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 3-25). Fort Worth, TX: HarperCollins.
24. ELLIS, A. (1974). The use and misuse of computers in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. EMIHOVICH, C. (1990). Technocentrism revisited: Computer literacy as cultural capital. Theory Into Practice, 29(4), 227-234.
26. FEY, M. (1998). Critical literacy in school-college collaboration through computer networking: A feminist research project. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 85-117.
27. GARNER, R., & GILLINGHAM, M. (1996). Internet connections in six classrooms: Conversations across time, space, and culture. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. GARNER, R., & GILLINGHAM, M. (1998). The Internet in the classroom: Is it the end of transmission-oriented pedagogy? In D.R. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Literacy for the 21st century: Technological transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 221-231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. GARTON, J. (1996). New genres and new literacies: The challenge of the virtual curriculum. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 20, 209-222.
30. GEE, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
31. GEE, J.P. (in press). Reading and the new literacy studies: Reframing the National Academy of Science's report on reading. Journal of Literacy Research.
32. GILSTER, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
33. GIROUX, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
34. GOLDBERG, K., & SHERWOOD, R.D. (1983). Microcomputers: A parent's guide. New York: Wiley.
35. GREENLEAF, C. (1992). Technological indeterminacy: The role of classroom writing practices and pedagogy in shaping students' use of the computer. Written Communication. 11, 85-130.
36. HAUGHLAND, S.W. (1992). Effects of computer software on preschool children's developmental gains. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 3(1), 15-30.
37. HEAVISIDE, S., FARRIS, E., MALITZ, G., & CARPENTER, J. (1995). Advanced telecommunications in U.S. public schools, K-12 (NCES 95-731). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
38. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION. (1998). National educational technology standards for students: Essential conditions to make it happen. [Online]. Available: www.http://cnets.iste.org/condition.htm
39. JONES, I. (1994). First-grade students' computer supported writing: Metacognitive and linguistic effects. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 453. (University Microfilms No. 95-20, 830)
40. KAMIL, M.L., & LANE, D.M. (1998). Researching the relationship between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D.R. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds), Literacy for the 21st century: Technological transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. KNOWLTON, S.R. (1997, November 3). Web taking a toll on college term papers: Professors raising concerns over quality of research. Atlanta Journal Constitution, p. B5.
42. KOZOL, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.
43. KRENDL, K.A., & WILLIAMS, R.B. (1990). The importance of being rigorous: Research on writing to read. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 81-86.
44. KULIK, C.C., KULIK, J., & BANGERT-DROWNS, R.L. (1984, April). Effects of computer based education of elementary school pupils. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
45. LABAREE, D.F. (1998). Educational researchers: Living with a lesser form of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 27(8), 4-12.
46. LABBO, L.D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356-385.
47. LABBO, L.D., & KUHN, M. (1998). Computers and emergent literacy: An examination of young children's computer-generated communicative symbol making. In D.R. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Literacy for the 21st century: Technological transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 79-91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. LABBO, L.D., PHILLIPS, M., & MURRAY, B. (1995-1996). "Writing to Read": From inheritance to innovation and invitation. The Reading Teacher, 49, 314-321.
49. LABBO, L.D., & REINKING, D. (in press). Computers in reading education: A course of study. In J. Many (Ed.), The literacy resource book: Touchstones from the teaching lives of literacy scholars. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. LABBO, L.D., REINKING D., & MCKENNA, M. (1995). Incorporating the computer into kindergarten: A case study. In K.A. Hinchman, D.J. Leu, & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice. 44th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 459-465). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
51. LANDOW, G. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52. LANHAM, R.A. (1993). The electronic word: Democracy, technology, and the arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. LATOUR, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination (pp. 103-131). New York: Routledge.
54. LEMKE, J.L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D.K. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Literacy for the 21st century: Technological transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283-301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. LEU, D.J. (1997). Caity's question: Literacy as deixis on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 41, 62-67.
56. LEU, D.J. (in press). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, R. Barr, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. LEU, D.J., HILLINGER, M., LOSEBY, P., BALCOM, M., DINKIN, J., ECKELS, M., JOHNSON, J., MATHEWS, K., & RAEGLER, R. (1998). Grounding the design of new technologies for literacy and learning in teachers instructional needs. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 203-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. LEU, D.J., & KINZER, C.K. (1999). Effective literacy instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
59. LEU, D.J., & LEU, D.D. (1998). Teaching with the Internet: Lessons from the classroom (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
60. LEVIN, H.M. (1986). Cost and cost effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction. In J.A. Culbertson & L.L. Cunningham (Eds.), Microcomputers and education. 85th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 156-174). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. MARTIN, J. (1986). Writing to read teacher's manual (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: IBM.
62. MCKENNA, M.C. (1998). Electronic texts and the transformation of beginning reading. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 45-59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. MCKENNA, M., & WATKINS, J. (1994, December). Computer-mediated books for beginning readers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
64. MCKENNA, M., & WATKINS, J. (1996, December). The effects of computer-mediated trade books on sight word acquisition and the development of phonics ability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.
65. MCKNIGHT, C., DILLON, A., & RICHARDSON, J. (1996). User-centered design of hypertext/hypermedia for education. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 622-633). New York: Macmillan.
66. MCLUHAN, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: Signet Books.
67. MEANS, B. (Ed.). (1994). Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68. MEDWELL, J. (1996). Talking books and reading. Reading, 30(1), 41-46.
69. MEHAN, H. (1989). Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology and social practice. Anthropology & Educational Quarterly, 20, 4-21.
70. MEYERS, J., HAMMET, R., & MCKILLOP, A.M. (1998). Opportunities for critical literacy/pedagogy in student authored hypermedia. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 63-78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. MIKULECKY, L., & KIRKLEY, J.R. (1998). Changing workplaces, changing classes: The new role of technology in workplace literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L.D Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 303-320). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. MILLER, L. & BURNETT, J.D. (1987). Using computers as an integral aspect of elementary language arts instruction: Paradoxes, problems, and promise (pp. 178-191). In D. Reinking (Ed.), Reading and computers: Issues for theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
73. MILLER, L., & OLSON, J. (1994). Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 121-141.
74. NEILSEN, L. (1998). Coding the light: Rethinking generational authority in a rural high school telecommunication project. In D. Keinking, M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 129-143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. NEUMAN, O. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 8-13.
76. OLSON, K. (1994). Writing and revising with pencils and computers: An analysis of the processes and products of seven first-grade children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 22, (University Microfilms No. 95-13, 449)
77. PAPERT, S. (1987). Computer criticism vs. technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 17(1), 22-30.
78. PAPERT, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
79. POSTMAN, N. (1992). Technopoly. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
80. REINKING, D. (1995). Reading and writing with computers: Literacy research in a post-typographic world. In K.A. Hinchman, D.J. Leu, & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.) Perspectives on literacy research and practice. 44th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 17-34). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
81. REINKING, D. (1997). ME and my hypertext:) A multiple digression analysis of technology and literacy (sic). The Reading Teacher, 50, 626-643.
82. REINKING, D. (1998). Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. xi-xxx). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. REINKING, D. (in press). Topics in computer-based reacting and writing. In J. Many (Ed.), The literacy resource book: Touchstones from the teaching lives of literacy scholars. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
84. REINKING, D., & BRIDWELL-BOWLES, L. (1991) Computers in reading and writing. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 310-340). New York: Longman.
85. REINKING, D., & PICKLE M. (1993). Using a formative experiment to study how computers affect reading and writing in classrooms. In D.J. Leu & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice. 42nd yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 263-270). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
86. REINKING, D., & WATKINS, J. (1996). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students' independent reading (Research Rep No. 55). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, University of Georgia.
87. REINKING, D., & WATKINS, J. (1998). Balancing change and understanding in literacy research through formative experiments. In T. Shanahan & F. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), Forty-seventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 461-471). Chicago: National Reading Conference
88. REITSMA, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 219-235.
89. KHEINGOLD, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
90. ROTH, S.F., & BECK, I.L. (1987). Theoretical and instructional implications of assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 197-218.
91. ROUET, J., LEVONEN, J., DILLON, A., & SPIRO, R. (Eds.). (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. RUBIN, A. (1984). The computer confronts the language arts: Cans and shoulds for education. In A.C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Classroom computers and cognitive science (pp. 201-217). New York: Academic Press.
93. SALOMON, G., PERKINS, D.N., & GLOBERSON, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9.
94. SHEINGOLD, K. (1991). Restructuring for learning with technology: The potential for synergy. Phil Delta Kappan, 73(1), 17-27.
95. SLAVIN, R. (1991). Reading effects of IBM's "Writing to Read" program: A review of evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 1-11.
96. STOKES, D.E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington. DC: Brookings Institute Press.
97. STOLL, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday.
98. TAO, L., & REINKING, D. (in press). A brief look at the literature on e-mail and literacy. Reading and Writing Quarterly.
99. TAPSCOTT, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
100. TERGAN, S. (1997). Misleading theoretical assumptions in hypertext hypermedia research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6, 257-283.
101. TERRANCE, P.D. (1996). Patterns of reading practice. Madison, WI: Advantage Learning Systems.
102. TIERNEY, R., & DAMARIN, S. (1998). Technology as enfranchisement and cultural development: Crisscrossing symbol systems, paradigm shifts, and social-cultural considerations. In D.R. Reinking, L.D. Labbo, M. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Literacy for the 21st century: Technological transformations in a post-typograpbic world (pp. 253-268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
103. U.S. CONGRESS, OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
104. VENEZKY, R.L. (1983). Evaluating computer-assisted instruction on its own terms. In A.C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Classroom computers and cognitive science (pp. 31-49). New York: Academic Press.
105. WARTELLA, E., & REEVES, B. (1983, June). Recurring issues in research on children and media. Educational Technology, 5-9.
106. WEBSTER'S NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY. (1974). Springfield, MA: Merriam.
107. WEIR, S. (1989). The computer in schools: Machine as humanizer. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 61-73.
108. WENGLINSKY, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service [Online]. Available: www.ets.org/research/pic
109. WIBURG, K. (1997). The dance of change: Integrating technology in classrooms. Computers in the Schools: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 13, 171-184.