The journey ahead: Thirteen teachers report how the internet influences literacy and literacy instruction in their K-12 classrooms

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 442-466

  Karchmer, Rachel A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039437987     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.36.4.5     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. ANDERSON-INMAN, L., & HORNEY, M.A. (1993, April). Profiles of hypertext readers: Case studies from the ElectroText project. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
2. ANDERSON-INMAN, L., & HORNEY, M.A. (1998). Transforming text for atrisk readers. In D. Reinking., M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 15-43). Mahwah, NJ: Eribaum.
3. ANGELO, T.A. (1996). Relating exemplary teaching to student learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, 57-64.
4. BAKER, E.A. (2000). Instructional approaches used to integrate literacy and technology. Reading Online, 4. Retrieved January 1, 2000 from the World Wide Web: www.readingonline.org/articles/baker/
5. BAKER, E.A., & KINZER, C.K. (1998). Effects of technology on process writing: Are they all good? In T. Shanahan & F.V. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), 47th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 428-440). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
6. BALLI, S.J., WRIGHT, M.D., & FOSTER, P.N. (1997). Preservice teachers' field experiences with technology. Educational Technology, 36(5), 40-46.
7. BECKER, H.J. (1991). When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints. The Computing Teacher, 18(8), 6-9.
8. BOGDAN, R.C., & BIKLEN, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9. BOLTER, J.D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
10. BOLTER, J.D. (1998). Hypertext and the question of visual literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 3-13). Mahwah, NJ: Eribaum.
11. BOYARIN, J. (Ed.). (1993). The ethnography of reading. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12. BRUCE, B.C. (1997a). Current issues and future directions. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 875-884). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
13. BRUCE, B.C. (1997b). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 289-309.
14. CALDERHEAD, J., & ROBSON, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 1-8.
15. CARTER, K., SABERS, D., CUSHING, K., PINNEGAR, S., & BERLINER, D. (1987). Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice and postulant teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 147-157.
16. CEO FORUM. (1999). Professional development: A link to better learning. Retrieved March 1, 1999 from the World Wide Web: www.ceoforum.org/ report99/99report.pdf
17. CHASE, S.E. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
18. CLANDININ, D.J., & CONNELLY, F.M. (1994). Personal experience method. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 413-427). London: Sage.
19. CLARK, R.E. (1991). When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educational Technology, 31, 34-40.
20. COLLINSON, V. (1996, July). Becoming an exemplary teacher: Integrating professional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal knowledge. Paper presented at the Japan-United States Teacher Education Consortium Annual Conference, Naruto, Japan.
21. CUBAN, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. CUBAN, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. DIRINGER, D. (1968). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
24. DRUCKER, P.F. (1994, November). The age of social transformation. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 53-80.
25. EL-HINDI, A.E. (1998). Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching with the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 51, 694-700.
26. GLASER, B., & STRAUSS, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
27. HODDER, I. (1994). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 393-412). London: Sage.
28. IVEY, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 172-192.
29. KAMIL, M.L., INTRATOR, S.M., & KIM, H.S. (2000). The effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.) Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 771-788). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. KAPLAN, N. (1991). Ideology, technology, and the future of writing instruction. In G.E. Hawisher & C.L. Seife (Eds.), Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies (pp. 11-42). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
31. KARCHMER, R.A. (2000). Understanding teachers' perspectives of Internet use in the classroom: Implications for teacher education and staff development. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 81-85.
32. LABBO, L.D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356-385.
33. LABBO, L.D., & KUHN, M. (1998). Electronic symbol-making: Young children's computer-related emerging concepts about literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 79-91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. LABBO, L.D., & REINKING, D. (1999). Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478-492.
35. LEU, D.J., JR. (2000). Continuously changing technologies and envisionments for literacy: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. LEU, D.J., KARCHMER, R.A., & LEU, D.D. (1999). The Miss Rumphius effect: Envisionments for literacy and learning that transform the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 52, 636-642.
37. LEU, D.J., JR., & KINZER, C.K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies tor information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
38. LEU, D.J., JR., MALLETTE, M.H., & KARCHMER, R.A. (in press). New literacies, new technologies, and new realities: Redefining the agenda for literacy research. Reading Research and Instruction.
39. LEU, D.J., JR., & REINKING, D. (1996). Bringing insights from reading research to research on electronic learning environments. In H.V. Oostendorp & S.D. Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 43-76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. LINCOLN, Y.S. (1997). What constitutes quality in interpretive research? In C.K. Kinzer, K.A. Hinchman, & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Inquiries in literacy theory and practice: 46th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 54-68). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
41. LINCOLN, Y.S., & GUBA, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. LIVINGSTON, C., & BORKO, H. (1989). Expert-novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 36-42.
43. LOWMAN, J. (1996). Characteristics of exemplary teachers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, 33-40.
44. MANGUEL, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.
45. MCKEON, C.A. (in press). E-mail as a motivating literacy event for one struggling reader: Donna's case. Reading Research and Instruction.
46. MEANS, B., BLANDO, J., OLSON, K., MIDDLETON, T., MOROCCO, C.C., REMZ, A.R., & ZORFASS, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. Washington, DC: Office of Research, United States Department of Education.
47. MIKULECKY, L., & KIRKLEY, J.R. (1998). Changing classes: The new role of technology in workplace literacy. In D. Reinking., M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 303-320). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. MITRA, A., & COHEN, E. (1999). Analyzing the Web: Directions and challenges. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 179-202). London: Sage.
49. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. (1999a). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Statistical analysis report January 1999. Retrieved April 28, 1999 from the World Wide Web: nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999080.htm
50. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. (1999b). Internet access in public schools and classrooms: 1994-1998. Retrieved March 6, 1999 from the World Wide Web: nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999017.hlml
51. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. (2000a). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-99. Retrieved June 20, 2000 from the World Wide Web: nces.ed.gov/pubsearcn/pubsinto.asp? pubid=2000086
52. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. (2000b). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology. Retrieved January 10, 2001 from the World Wide Web: nces.ed.gov/spider/ webspider/2000102.shtml
53. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION. (1997). Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Retrieved March 4, 1999 from the World Wide Web: www.ncate.org/projects/tech
54. NEW LONDON GROUP. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
55. NICAISE, M., & BARNES, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 205-212.
56. OPPENHEIMER, T. (1997, July). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved January 15, 1999 from the World Wide Web: www.the atlantic.com/issues/97jul/computer.html
57. PERKINS, D.N. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology, 5, 18-23.
58. REINKING, D. (1995). Reading and writing with computers: Literacy research in a post-typographic world. In K.A. Hinchman, D.J. Leu, & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice: 44th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 17-33) Chicago: National Reading Conference.
59. REINKING, D. (1998). Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographical world. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. xi-xxx) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. REINKING, D., & CHANLIN, L.J. (1994). Graphic aids in electronic texts. Reading Research and Instruction, 33, 207-232.
61. REINKING, D., LABBO, L., & MCKENNA, M. (1997). Navigating the changing landscape of literacy: Current theory and research in computer-based reading and writing. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 77-92). NY: Macmillan Library Reference.
62. REINKING, D., & RICKMAN, S.S. (1990). The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 395-411.
63. REPORT OF THE WEB-BASED EDUCATION COMMISSION TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS. (2000, December). The power of the Internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Retrieved January 2, 2001 from the World Wide Web: interact.hpcnet.org/webcommission/index.htm
64. SALOMON, G., GLOBERSON, T., & GUTERMAN, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620-627.
65. SCHÖN, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
66. STAHL, S.A., HYND, C.R., BRITTON, B.K., MCNISH, M.M., & BOSQUET, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-449.
67. TAO, L., & REINKING, D. (1996). What research reveals about email in education (Report No. CS-012-853). Charleston. SC: Annual Meeting of the College Reading Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 572)
68. TRATHEN, W., & MOORMAN, G. (in press). Using e-mail to create pedagogical dialogue in teacher education. Reading Research and Instruction.
69. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. (2000). Learning a living: A blueprint for high-performance. A SCANS report for America 2000. Retrieved January 5, 2001 from the World Wide Web: www.ttrc.doleta.gov/SCANS/work.html
70. WHITE HOUSE PANELON EDUCATIONALTECHNOLOGY. (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Retrieved August 20, 1998 from the World Wide Web: www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/NSTC/PCAST/K-12ed.hlml#5.1
71. WOOD, J.M. (1999). Early literacy instruction and educational technologies: Three classroom-based models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.