A developmental perspective on feedback: How corrective feedback influences children’s literacy, mathematics, and problem solving

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2023, Pages 130-145

  Fyfe, Emily R ^a   Borriello, Giulia A ^a   Merrick, Megan ^a  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85137842898     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2022.2108426     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35 (1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.127
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002213
3. Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (3), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498
4. Bohlmann, N. L., & Fenson, L. (2005). The effects of feedback on perseverative errors in preschool aged children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6 (1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0601_7
5. Bonneton-Botté, N., Fleury, S., Girard, N., Le Magadou, M., Cherbonnier, A., Renault, M., Anquetil, E., & Jamet, E. (2020). Can tablet apps support the learning of handwriting? An investigation of learning outcomes in kindergarten classroom. Computers & Education, 151, 103831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103831
6. Brosvic, G. M., Dihoff, R. E., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. L. (2006). Feedback facilitates the acquisition and retention of numerical fact series by elementary school students with mathematics learning disabilities. The Psychological Record, 56 (1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395536
7. Brown, S. A., & Alibali, M. W. (2018). Promoting strategy change: Mere exposure to alternative strategies helps, but feedback can hurt. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19 (3), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2018.1477778
8. Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (2), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031026
9. Butler, A. C., & Woodward, N. R. (2018). Towards a consilience in the use of task-level feedback to promote learning. In K. D. Federmeier (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 1–38). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.001
10. Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., González, F., & Gardulski, V. (2021). Is more detailed feedback better for problem-solving? Interactive Learning Environments, 29 (7), 1189–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619595
11. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.
12. Chen, Z., Honomichl, R., Kennedy, D., & Tan, E. (2016). Aiming to complete the matrix: Eye-movement analysis of processing strategies in children’s relational thinking. Developmental Psychology, 52 (6), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000113
13. Chiu, S., & Alexander, P. A. (2014). Young children’s analogical reasoning: The role of immediate feedback. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32 (5), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913515442
14. Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2008). Advice on tool use in open learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17 (1), 81–97. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22944/
15. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Irvington Publishers.
16. Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2005). Adjunctive role for immediate feedback in the acquisition and retention of mathematical fact series by elementary school students classified with mild mental retardation. The Psychological Record, 55 (1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395497
17. Duhon, G. J., House, S., Hastings, K., Poncy, B., & Solomon, B. (2015). Adding immediate feedback to explicit timing: An option for enhancing treatment intensity to improve mathematics fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24 (1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9203-y
18. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43 (6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
19. Espinet, S. D., Anderson, J. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2013). Reflection training improves executive function in preschool-age children: Behavioral and neural effects. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.009
20. Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & Education, 106, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.001
21. Fazio, L. K., Kennedy, C. A., & Siegler, R. S. (2016). Improving children’s knowledge of fraction magnitudes. PLoS One, 11 (10), e0165243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165243
22. Fyfe, E. R. (2016). Providing feedback on computer-based algebra homework in middle-school classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.082
23. Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016a). Feedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108 (1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000053
24. Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016b). The benefits of computer-generated feedback for mathematics problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 147, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.009
25. Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Mathematics practice without feedback: A desirable difficulty in a classroom setting. Instructional Science, 45 (2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9401-1
26. Fyfe, E. R., Rittle-Johnson, B., & DeCaro, M. S. (2012). The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (4), 1094–1108. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028389
27. Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40 (2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.177
28. Grundmann, F., Scheibe, S., & Epstude, K. (2021). When ignoring negative feedback is functional: Presenting a model of motivated feedback disengagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30 (1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420969386
29. Hargreaves, E. (2012). Teachers’ classroom feedback: Still trying to get it right. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.630454
30. Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T., & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26 (2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5
31. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
32. Hattie, J. A. C., & Yates, G. C. R. (2014). Using feedback to promote learning. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 45–58). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.
33. Hendriks, E., Muris, P., & Meesters, C. (2022). The influence of negative feedback and social rank on feelings of shame and guilt: A vignette study in 8-to 13-year-old non-clinical children. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 53 (3), 411–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-021-01143-4
34. Heyman, G. D., Fu, G., & Lee, K. (2013). Selective skepticism: American and Chinese children's reasoning about evaluative academic feedback. Developmental Psychology, 49 (3), 543–553.
35. Hier, B. O., & Eckert, T. L. (2014). Evaluating elementary-aged students’ abilities to generalize and maintain fluency gains of a performance feedback writing intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 29 (4), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000040
36. Hier, B. O., & Eckert, T. L. (2016). Programming generality into a performance feedback writing intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of School Psychology, 56, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.03.003
37. Hier, B. O., Eckert, T. L., & Viney, E. A. (2019). Generalization and maintenance effects of writing fluency intervention strategies for elementary-age students: A randomized controlled trial. School Psychology Review, 48 (4), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0123.V48-4
38. Honomichl, R. D., & Chen, Z. (2006). Learning to align relations: The effects of feedback and self-explanation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7 (4), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0704_5
39. Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19 (4), 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
40. Kao, G. Y. M., Tsai, C. C., Liu, C. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2016). The effects of high/low interactive electronic storybooks on elementary school students’ reading motivation, story comprehension and chromatics concepts. Computers & Education, 100, 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.013
41. Kegel, C. A., & Bus, A. G. (2012). Online tutoring as a pivotal quality of web-based early literacy programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (1), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025849
42. Kegel, C. A., Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility in early literacy instruction through computer games: The role of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4). Mind, Brain, and Education, 5 (2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01112.x
43. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
44. Koenig, E. A., Eckert, T. L., & Hier, B. O. (2016). Using performance feedback and goal setting to improve elementary students' writing fluency: A randomized controlled trial. School Psychology Review, 45 (3), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-3.275-295
45. Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2006). Do children and adults learn differently? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7 (3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0703_1
46. Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1 (4), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320096
47. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L C. (1988). Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 58 (1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001079
48. Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5 (2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9056-2
49. Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., & Merriman, W. E. (2009). Persistent overconfidence despite practice: The role of task experience in preschoolers’ recall predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103 (2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.002
50. Lobato, J. (2006). Alternative perspectives on the transfer of learning: History, issues, and challenges for future research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15 (4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_1
51. Mangels, J. A., Good, C., Whiteman, R. C., Maniscalco, B., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Emotion blocks the path to learning under stereotype threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7 (2), 230–241.
52. Marble, K. E., Boseovski, J. J., & Hill, A. (2021). Is honesty always the best policy? Children’s perceptions of negative performance feedback. Social Development, 30 (4), 910–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12517
53. Martin-Chang, S. (2017). Learning to read with and without feedback, in and out of context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109 (2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000131
54. Martin-Chang, S., Ouellette, G., & Bond, L. (2017). Differential effects of context and feedback on orthographic learning: How good is good enough? Scientific Studies of Reading, 21 (1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1263993
55. Messer, D. J., Mohamedali, M. H., & Fletcher, B. (1996). Using computers to help pupils tell the time, is feedback necessary? Educational Psychology, 16 (3), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341960160305
56. Monteiro, V., Mata, L., Santos, N., Sanches, C., & Gomes, M. (2019). Classroom talk: The ubiquity of feedback. Frontiers in Education, 4, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00140
57. Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 745–783). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
58. Muis, K. R., Ranellucci, J., Trevors, G., & Duffy, M. C. (2015). The effects of technology-mediated immediate feedback on kindergarten students’ attitudes, emotions, engagement and learning outcomes during literacy skills development. Learning and Instruction, 38, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.02.001
59. Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Waxmann.
60. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (NGACBP). (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, Appendix A. http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards
61. Nelson, L. J., & Fyfe, E. R. (2019). Metacognitive monitoring and help-seeking decisions on mathematical equivalence problems. Metacognition and Learning, 14 (2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09203-w
62. Nobel, K., & Grünke, M. (2020). Effects of a computerized STOP & LIST intervention to foster text production skills in students who struggle with composition writing. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 17 (1), 73–85.
63. Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Cerezo, R., & Valle, A. (2015). Teachers’ feedback on homework, homework-related behaviors, and academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 108 (3), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.878298s
64. Patchan, M. M., & Puranik, C. S. (2016). Using tablet computers to teach preschool children to write letters: Exploring the impact of extrinsic and intrinsic feedback. Computers & Education, 102, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.007
65. Plebanek, D. J., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2017). Costs of selective attention: When children notice what adults miss. Psychological Science, 28 (6), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617693005
66. Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x
67. Rutherford, T., Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S. M., & Farkas, G. (2018). Links between achievement, executive functions, and self‐regulated learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32 (6), 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3462
68. Schuldt, L. C. (2019). Feedback in action: Examining teachers’ oral feedback to elementary writers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.020
69. Shin, H., Bjorklund, D. F., & Beck, E. F. (2007). The adaptive nature of children’s overestimation in a strategic memory task. Cognitive Development, 22 (2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.001
70. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1) 8, 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
71. Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (8), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
72. Spaai, G. W., Ellermann, H. H., & Reitsma, P. (1991). Effects of segmented and whole-word sound feedback on learning to read single words. The Journal of Educational Research, 84 (4), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1991.10886017
73. Stevenson, C. E. (2017). Role of working memory and strategy-use in feedback effects on children’s progression in analogy solving: An explanatory item response theory account. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27 (3), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0129-5
74. Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10 (3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
75. Tärning, B., Lee, Y. J., Andersson, R., Månsson, K., Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2020). Assessing the black box of feedback neglect in a digital educational game for elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29 (4–5), 511–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1770092
76. Tarullo, A. R., Nayak, S., St. John, A. M., & Doan, S. N. (2018). Performance effects of reward-related feedback on the Dimensional Change Card Sort task. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179 (4), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2018.1466264
77. Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15 (2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881509348831
78. Timms, M., DeVelle, S., & Lay, D. (2016). Towards a model of how learners process feedback: A deeper look at learning. Australian Journal of Education, 60 (2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116652912
79. Touw, K. W., Vogelaar, B., Thissen, F., Rovers, S., & Resing, W. C. (2020). Progression and individual differences in children’s series completion after dynamic testing. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12272
80. Truckenmiller, A. J., Eckert, T. L., Codding, R. S., & Petscher, Y. (2014). Evaluating the impact of feedback on elementary aged students’ fluency growth in written expression: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of School Psychology, 52 (6), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.09.001
81. Tudge, J., & Winterhoff, P. (1993). Can young children benefit from collaborative problem solving? Tracing the effects of partner competence and feedback. Social Development, 2 (3), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1993.tb00016.x
82. Tudge, J. R. H., Winterhoff, P. A., & Hogan, D. M. (1996). The cognitive consequences of collaborative problem solving with and without feedback. Child Development, 67 (6), 2892–2909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01894.x
83. van Bers, B., van Schijndel, T., Visser, I., & Raijmakers, M. (2020). Cognitive flexibility training has direct and near transfer effects, but no far transfer effects, in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 193, Article 104809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104809
84. van Bers, B. M., Visser, I., & Raijmakers, M. (2014). Preschoolers learn to switch with causally related feedback. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.007
85. Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85 (4), 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881
86. van Gorp, K., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). The role of feedback and differences between good and poor decoders in a repeated word reading paradigm in first grade. Annals of Dyslexia, 67 (1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0129-z
87. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge University Press.
88. Wardlow, L., & Heyman, G. D. (2016). The roles of feedback and working memory in children’s reference production. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.016
89. Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43 (7), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660
90. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52 (1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
91. Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2019). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087