Towards a model of how learners process feedback: A deeper look at learning

Australian Journal of Education

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 128-145

  Timms, Michael ^a   Develle, Sacha ^a   Lay, Dulce ^a  

^a Australian Council for Educational Research   (Australia)

Author keywords

cognitive psychology; education; Feedback; hints; intelligent learning environment; intelligent learning environments; learning; neuroscience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981531619     PISSN: 00049441     EISSN: 20505884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0004944116652912     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aleven V., (2013) Help seeking and intelligent tutoring systems: theoretical perspectives and a step towards theoretical integration. In: Azevedo R., Aleven V., (eds) International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies, New York: Springer, pp. 311-335.
2. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. (2000). Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: 5th International Conference, ITS 2000, Montreal, Canada, 19-23 June 2000 Proceedings (pp. 292-303). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
3. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). Towards computer-based tutoring of help-seeking skills. In S. Karabenick & R. Newman (Eds.), Help seeking in academic settings: Goals, groups, and contexts (pp.259-296). Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum.
4. Aleven V., McLaren B., Sewall J., van Velsen M., Popescu O., Demi S., Koedinger K., (2016) Example-tracing tutors: Intelligent tutor development for non-programmers. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26 (1): 224-269.
5. Amadieu F., Van Gog T., Paas F., Tricot A., Mariné C., (2009) Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning. Learning and Instruction 19 (5): 376-386.
6. Anderson J. R., (1993) Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist 48 (1): 35.
7. Andrews G., Birney D., Halford G., (2006) Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences. Memory and Cognition 34 (6): 1325-1340.
8. Boucheix J., Lowe R., (2010) An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction 20 (2): 123-135.
9. Butler D., Winne P., (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245-281.
10. Carpenter P., Just M., (1989) The role of working memory in language comprehension. In: Klahr D., Kotovsky K., (eds) Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 31-68.
11. Chaouachi, M., & Frasson, C. (2010). Exploring the relationship between learner EEG mental engagement and affect. In V. Aleven, J. Kay, & J. Mostow (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: 10th International Conference, ITS 2010, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 14-18 June 2010 Proceedings, Part II (pp. 291-293). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
12. Collins A., Brown J., (1988) The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In: Mandl H., Lesgold A., (eds) Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1-18.
13. Conati C., Jaques N., Muir M., (2013) Understanding attention to adaptive hints in educational games: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 23 (1-4): 136-161.
14. Crone E., Zanolie K., Van Leijenhorst V., Westenberg P., Rombouts S., (2008) Neural mechanisms supporting flexible performance adjustment during development. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 8 (2): 165-177.
15. nd Annual Conference on Learning, Madrid, Spain.
16. DeVelle, S. (2016) Creative insight problem solving: What teachers should know. Teacher Magazine [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/article/creative-insight-problem-solving-what-teachers-should-know.
17. D'Mello S., Olney A., Williams C., Hays P., (2012) Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70 (5): 377-398.
18. Fischer P., Mandl H., (1988) Knowledge acquisition by computerized audiovisual feedback. European Journal of Psychology of Education 3 (2): 217-233.
19. Ginns P., (2005) Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction 15 (4): 313-331.
20. Goldin, I. M., Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V. (2012). Learner differences in hint processing. In K. Yacef, O. Zaïane, H. Hershkovitz, M. Yudelson, & J. Stamper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 73-80).
21. Goo J., (2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34 (03): 445-474.
22. Harrington M., Sawyer M., (1992) L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 25-38.
23. Hattie J., Timperley H., (2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81-112.
24. Lai M., Tsai M., Yang F., Hsu C., Liu T., Lee S., Tsai C., (2013) A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review 10: 90-115.
25. Mason, B., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Retrieved from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html.
26. Mayer R., (2009) Multimedia learning, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. Mayer R., (2014) Computer games for learning: An evidence-based approach, Massachusetts, England: MIT Press.
28. Metcalfe J., Kornell N., Finn B., (2009) Delayed versus immediate feedback in children's and adults' vocabulary learning. Memory and Cognition 37 (8): 1077-1087.
29. Mory E., (2004) Feedback research revisited. In: Jonassen D., (ed.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology Vol. 2, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 745-783.
30. Pettito, L., & Dunbar, K. (2004). New findings from educational neuroscience on bilingual brains, scientific brains, and the educated mind. Monograph: Mind, Brain and Education.
31. Rayner K., (1998) Eye movements in reading and information Processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124 (3): 372-422.
32. Recker, M., & Pirolli, P. (1992). Student strategies for learning programming from a computational environment. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & G. McCalla (Eds.), Proceedings on intelligent tutoring systems: Second international conference, ITS 92, Montreal, Canada, 10-12 June 1992 (pp. 382-394). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
33. Roll I., Baker R. S. J. D., Aleven V., Koedinger K. R., (2014) On the benefits of seeking (and avoiding) help in online problem-solving environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences 23 (4): 537-560. doi:10. 1080/10508406.2014.883977.
34. Sandkühler S., Bhattacharya J., (2008) Deconstructing insight: EEG correlates of insightful problem solving. PLoS One 3 (1): e1459.
35. Shute V., (2008) Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153-189.
36. Timms, M., DeVelle, S., & Schwanter, U. (2015). Towards a model of how learners process feedback. In C. Conati, N. Heffernan, A. Mitrovic, & M. Felisa Verdejo (Eds.), The published proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Education Conference 2015 (pp. 794-799). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
37. Van Duijvenvoorde A., Zanolie K., Rombouts S., Raijmakers M., Crone E., (2008) Evaluating the negative or valuing the positive? Neural mechanisms supporting feedback-based learning across development. The Journal of Neuroscience 28 (38): 9495-9503.
38. Walsh M. W., Anderson J. R., (2012) Learning from experience: Event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 36 (8): 1870-1884.
39. Wood H., Wood D., (1999) Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education 33 (2): 153-169.