Feedback facilitates the acquisition and retention of numerical fact series by elementary school students with mathematics learning disabilities

Psychological Record

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 35-54

  Brosvic, Gary M ^a   Dihoff, Roberta E ^b   Epstein, Michael L ^a   Cook, Michael L ^a  

^a RIDER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROWAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32944467590     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395536     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. BADIAN, D. B., HATTON, D. D., & SKINNER, M. (1983). In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (pp. 235-264). New York: Grune & Stratton.
2. BAECHLE, C. L., & LIAN, M. G. (1990). The effects of direct feedback and practice on metaphor performance in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 451-455.
3. BENNETT, K., & CAVANAUGH, R. A. (1998). Effects of immediate self-correction, delayed self-correction, and no correction on the acquisition and maintenance of multiplication facts by a fourth-grade student with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 303-306.
4. BROWN, A. I. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from text by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities, 4, 1-17.
5. CALDWELL, N. K., WOLERY, M., WERTS, M. G., & CALDWELL, Y. (1996). Embedding feedback into teacher-student interactions during independent seat work. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 459-480.
6. CAWLEY, J. F., PARMAR, R. S., YAN, W. F., & MILLER, J. H. (1996). Arithmetic computation abilities of students with learning disabilities: Implications for instruction. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 230-237.
7. CAWLEY, J. F., PARMAR, R. S, VAN, W. F., & MILLER, J. H. (1998). Arithmetic computation performance of students with learning disabilities: Implications for curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 68-74.
8. DIHOFF, R. E., BROSVIC, G. M., & EPSTEIN, M. L. (2003). The role of feedback during academic testing: The delay retention effect revisited. The Psychological Record, 53, 533-548.
9. DIHOFF, R. E., BROSVIC, G. M., EPSTEIN, M. L., & COOK, MICHAEL J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54, 207-231.
10. EPSTEIN, M. L., BROSVIC, G. M., DIHOFF, R. E., LAZARUS, A. D., & COSTNER, K. L. (2003). Effectiveness of feedback during the testing of preschool children, elementary school children, and adolescents with developmental delays. The Psychological Record, 53, 177-195.
11. GEARY, D. C., & BROWN, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
12. GEARY, D. C., BROWN, S. C., & SAMARANAYAKE, V. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 787-797.
13. GOLDMAN, S. R., MERTZ, D. L., & PELLEGRINO, J. W. (1989). Individual differences in extended practice functions and solution strategies for basic addition facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 481-496.
14. GREIFFENSTEIN, M. F., & BAKER, W. J. (2002). Neuropsychological and psychosocial correlates of adult arithmetic deficiency. Neuropsychology, 16, 451-458.
15. HEUBUSCH, J. D., & LLOYD, J. W. (1998). Corrective feedback in oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 63-79.
16. JORDAN, N. C., & HANICH, L. D. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second-grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 567-578.
17. JORDAN, N. C., KAPLAN, D., & HANICH, L. B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586-597.
18. KEARNEY, C. A., & DRABMAN, R. S. (1993). The write-say method for improving spelling accuracy in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 52-56.
19. LOMBARDO, T. W., & DRABMAN, R. S. (1985). Teaching LD children multiplication tables. Academic Therapy, 4, 438-442.
20. MAZZOCCO, M. M. (2001). Math learning disability and math LD subtypes: Evidence from studies of Turner Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome, and Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 520-533.
21. MORRIS, R. C., SHAYWITZ, S. E., SHANKWEILER, D. P., KATZ, L., STUEBIN, K. K., FLETCHER, J. M., LYON, G. R., FRANCIS, D. J., & SHAYWITZ, B. A. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347-373.
22. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. OSTAD, S. A. (1999). Developmental progression of subtraction strategies: A comparison of mathematically disabled and mathematically normal children. Mathematical Cognition, 4, 1-20.
24. PANY, D., & MCCOY, K. M. (1988). Effects of corrective feedback on word accuracy and reading comprehension of readers with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 546-550.
25. PERKINS, V. L. (1988). Feedback effects on oral reading errors of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 244-248.
26. PRESSEY, S. L. (1950). Development and appraisal of devices providing immediate automatic sorting of objective tests and concomitant self-instruction. The Journal of Psychology, 29, 417-447.
27. ROBINSON, S. L., DEPASCALE, C., & ROBERTS, F. C. (1989). Computer-delivered feedback in group-based instruction: Effects for learning disabled students in mathematics. Learning Disability Focus, 5, 28-35.
28. SEIDMAN, L. J., BIEDERMAN, J., MONUTEAUX, M. C., DOYLE, A. E., & FARAONE, S. V. (2001). Learning disabilities and executive dysfunction in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychology, 15, 544-556.
29. SIEGLER, R. S. (1986). Unities across domains in children's strategy choices. In M. Pedmutter (Ed.), Perspectives for intellectual development: Minnesota Symposia on child psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. SKINNER, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Meredith Corporation.
31. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. (2002). Health, United States, 1998. Hyattsville, MD. Publication: PHS 98-1232. Author.