Feedback literacies as sociomaterial practice

Critical Studies in Education

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2022, Pages 261-274

  Gravett, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

dialogue; Feedback; higher education; literacy and literacies; sociomateriality; student engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082935719     PISSN: 17508487     EISSN: 17508495     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2020.1747099     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42 (2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
2. Baadte, C., & Schnotz, W. (2013). Feedback effects on performance, motivation and mood: Are they moderated by the learner’s self-concept? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58 (5), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.781059
3. Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15 (2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019
4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Duke University Press.
5. Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36 (6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003731135
6. Bennett, A., & Burke, P. J. (2017). Re/conceptualising time and temporality: An exploration of time in higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(6), 913–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1312285
7. Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
8. Bing-You, R. G., Paterson, J., & Levine, M. A. (1997). Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Medical Teacher, 19 (1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599709019346
9. Bottrell, D., & Manathunga, C. (2019). Resisting neoliberalism in higher education: Seeing through the cracks. Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Brooks, R., & Waters, J. (2018). Materialities and mobilities in higher education. Routledge.
11. Burke, D. (2009). Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801895711
12. Burke, P. J., Bennett, A., Bunn, M., Stevenson, J., & Clegg, S. (2017). It’s about time: Working towards more equitable understandings of the impact of higher education. National centre for student equity in higher education (NCSEHE). Curtin University: Perth.
13. Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43 (8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
14. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36 (4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
15. Charteris, J. (2016). Dialogic feedback as divergent assessment for learning: An ecological approach to teacher professional development. Critical Studies in Education, 57 (3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.1057605
16. Chong, S. W. (2020). Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765
17. Clegg, S. (2010). Time future - the dominant discourse of higher education. Time and Society, 19 (3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10381528
18. Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (5), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601116912
19. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. Routledge.
20. Gourlay, L. (2015). ‘Student engagement’ and the tyranny of participation. Teaching in Higher Education, 20 (4), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020784
21. Gourlay, L. (2017). Student engagement, ‘learnification’ and the sociomaterial: Critical perspectives on higher education policy. Higher Education Policy, 30 (1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0037-1
22. Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2018). Student engagement in the digital university: Sociomaterial assemblages. Routledge.
23. Gourlay, L. (2019). Textual practices as already-posthuman: Re-imagining text, authorship and meaning-making in higher education. In C. Taylor & A. Bayley (Eds.), Posthumanism and higher education: Re-imagining pedagogy, practice and research (pp. 237–254). Springer.
24. Gravett, K. (2019). Making learning happen: Students’ development of academic and information literacies. In S. Lygo-Baker, I. Kinchin, & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Engaging student voices in higher education: Diverse perspectives and expectations in partnership (pp. 297–313). Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Gravett, K., & Winstone, N. E. (2019a). ‘Feedback interpreters’: The role of learning development professionals in facilitating university students’ engagement with feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 24 (6), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1498076
26. Gravett, K., & Winstone, N. E. (2019b). Storying students’ becomings into and through higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1695112
27. Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37 (4), 543–560. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2011.604951
28. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Routledge.
29. Hernandez, R. (2012). Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning? Higher Education, 64 (4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9506-7
30. Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27 (1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099368
31. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23 (2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
32. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45 (4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
33. Lillis, T., & Tuck, J. (2016). Academic Literacies: A critical lens on writing and reading in the academy. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of english for academic purposes (pp. 30–43). Routledge.
34. Loveday, V. (2018). The neurotic academic: Anxiety, casualisation, and governance in the neoliberalising university. Journal of Cultural Economy, 11 (2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1426032
35. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Polity Press.
36. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. Sage.
37. Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2019). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
38. Nash, R., & Winstone, N. E. (2017). Responsibility-sharing in the giving and receiving of assessment feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1519), 250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519
39. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
40. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
41. Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18 (3), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001
42. Pitt, E., Bearman, M., & Esterhazy, R. (2019). The conundrum of low achievement and feedback for learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1630363
43. Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
44. Price, M., Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Handley, K. (2012). Assessment literacy: The foundation for improving student learning. Oxford Centre for Staff Learning Development.
45. Raaper, R. (2016). Academic perceptions of higher education assessment processes in neoliberal academia. Critical Studies in Education, 57 (2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.1019901
46. Raaper, R. (2018). Students’ unions and consumerist policy discourses in English higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1417877
47. Stein-Uttheim, A., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15 (15), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002
48. Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49 (1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.647781
49. Taras, M. (2008). Issues of power and equity in two models of self assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 13 (1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701794076
50. Taylor, C., & Bayley, A. (2019). Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research. Palgrave Macmillan.
51. Taylor, C., & Ivanson, G. (2016). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Routledge.
52. Turner, G., & Gibbs, G. (2010). Are assessment environments gendered? An analysis of the learning responses of male and female students to different assessment environments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (6), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902977723
53. Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (3), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500353061
54. Winstone, N. E., & Pitt, E. (2017). Feedback is a two-way street. So why does the NSS only look one way? Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/feedback-two-way-street-so-why-does-nss-only-look-one-way
55. Winstone, N. E., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.
56. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52 (1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
57. Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research and Development, 37 (4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417
58. Zukas, M., & Malcolm, J. (2019). Reassembling academic work: A sociomaterial investigation of academic learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 41 (3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1482861