Marking and moderation in the UK: False assumptions and wasted resources

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 209-220

  Bloxham, Sue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Degree classification; External examining; Marking; Moderation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951197905     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930801955978     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Baird, J., J. Greatorex, and J.F. Bell. 2004. What makes marking reliable? Experiments with UK examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11, no. 3: 331-48.
2. Baume, D., M. Yorke, and M. Coffey. 2004. What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 4: 451-77.
3. Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for quality learning at university. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. 1st ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
5. Black, P. and D. Wiliam. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5, no. 1: 7-74.
6. Bloxham, S., and P. Boyd. 2007. Developing effective assessment in higher education: A practical guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
7. Bridges, P., and P. Bourdillon. 1999. Discipline related marking behaviour using percentages: A potential cause of inequity in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24, no. 3: 285-301.
8. Broad, B. 2000. Pulling your hair out: Crises of standardization in communal writing assessment. Research in the Teaching of English 35, no. 2: 213-60.
9. Clegg, K., and C. Bryan. 2006. Reflections, rationales and realities. In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, ed. C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 216-27. London: Routledge.
10. Crook, C.K., H. Gross, and R. Dymott. 2006. Assessment relationships in higher education: The tension of process and practice. British Educational Research Journal 32, no. 1: 95-114.
11. Earl, L.M. 2003. Assessment as learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
12. Ecclestone, K. 2001. I know a 2:1 when I see it: Understanding criteria for degree classifications in franchised university programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25, no. 3: 301-13.
13. Eisner, E.W. 1985. The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. London: Falmer.
14. Elton, L. and B. Johnston. 2002. Assessment in universities: A critical review of research. York:Higher Education Academy.
15. Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving assessment through student involvement. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
16. Gibbs, G. 1999. Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches, ed. S. Brown and A. Glasner, 41-53. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
17. Gibbs, G. 2006. Why assessment is changing. In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, ed. C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 11-22. London: Routledge.
18. Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2004-5. Conditions under which assessment supports student learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1, no. 1: 3-31.
19. Hand, L., and D. Clewes. 2000. Marking the difference: An investigation of the criteria used for assessing undergraduate dissertations in a business school. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25, no. 1: 5-21.
20. Hartley, J., M. Trueman, L. Betts, and L. Brodie. 2006. What price presentation? The effects of typographic variables on essay grades. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 5: 523-34.
21. Heywood, J. 2000. Assessment in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
22. Higher Education Academy. 2004. Working paper 4: The process of academic external examining. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp?process=full_record§ion=generic&id=366 (accessed November 20, 2006).
23. Hornby, W. 2003. Assessing using grade-related criteria: A single currency for universities? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 4: 435-54.
24. Hounsell, D., V. McCune, J. Hounsell, and J. Litjens. 2006. The quality of guidance and feedback. Paper presented to the Northumbria EARLI SIG Assessment Conference, August 30-September 1, in Darlington.
25. Klenowski, V., and J. Elwood. 2002. Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27, no. 3: 243-56.
26. Knight, P.T. 2000. The value of a programme-wide approach to assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25, no. 3: 237-51.
27. Knight, P.T. 2006. The local practices of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 4: 435-52.
28. Knight, P.T., and M. Yorke. 2003. Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
29. McGhee, P. 2003. The academic quality handbook: Enhancing higher education in universities and further education colleges. London: Kogan Page.
30. Murphy, R. 2006. Evaluating new priorities for assessment in higher education. In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, ed. C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 37-47. London: Routledge.
31. National Student Survey. 2006. The National Student Survey. http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/ (accessed September 13, 2006).
32. Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 2: 199-218.
33. Norton, L. 2004. Using assessment criteria as learning criteria: A case study in psychology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, no. 6: 687-702.
34. Norton, L., K. Harrington, J. Elander, S. Sinfield, P. Reddy, E. Pitt, and O. Aiyegbayo. 2004. Supporting diversity and inclusivity through writing workshops. Paper presented at the International Improving Student Learning Symposium, September 6-8, in Birmingham.
35. Orr, S. 2007. Assessment moderation: Constructing the marks and constructing the students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32, no. 6: 645-56.
36. Partington, J. 1994. Double-marking students work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 19, no. 1: 57-60.
37. Price, M. 2005. Assessment standards: The role of communities of practice and the scholarship of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 3: 215-30.
38. Price, M., and C. Rust. 1999. The experience of introducing a common criteria assessment grid across an academic department. Quality in Higher Education 5, no. 2: 133-44.
39. QAA. 2005. Outcomes from institutional audits: External examiners and their reports. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency.
40. QAA. 2006. Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 6: Assessment of students. 2nd ed. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency.
41. QAA. 2007. The classification of degree awards. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency.
42. Read, B., B. Francis, and J. Robson. 2005. Gender, bias, assessment and feedback: Analyzing the written assessment of undergraduate history essays. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 3: 241-60.
43. Sadler, D.R. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18, no. 2: 119-44.
44. Sadler, D.R. 2005. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 2: 175-94.
45. Scouller, K.M., and M. Prosser. 1994. Students' experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations. Studies in Higher Education 19, no. 3: 267-79.
46. Silver, H., A. Stennett, and R. Williams. 1995. The external examiner system: Possible futures. London: Quality Support Centre.
47. Smith, E., and K. Coombe. 2006. Quality and qualms in the marking of university assignments by sessional staff: An exploratory study. Higher Education 51, no. 1: 45-69.
48. Swann, J., and K. Ecclestone. 1999. Litigation and learning: Tensions in improving university lecturers assessment practice. Assessment in Education 6, no. 3: 357-75.
49. Universities UK. 2004. Measuring and recording student achievement (The Burgess Report). London: Author.
50. Universities UK. 2006. The UK Honours degree: Provision of information. 2nd consultation paper. London: Author.
51. Universities UK. 2007. Beyond the Honours degree classification: The Burgess Group final report. London: Author.
52. Watson, D. 2006. Who killed what in the quality wars. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency.
53. Wolf, A. 1995. Competence-based assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
54. Woolf, H. 2004. Assessment criteria: Reflections on current practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 4: 479-93.
55. Yorke, M. 2008. Grading student achievement in higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.
56. Yorke, M., P. Bridges, and H. Woolfe. 2000. Mark distributions and marking practices in UK higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education 1, no. 1: 7-27.