The development of academics’ feedback literacy: experiences of learning from critical feedback via scholarly peer review

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2020, Pages 651-665

  Gravett, Karen ^a   Kinchin, Ian M ^a   Winstone, Naomi E ^a   Balloo, Kieran ^a   Heron, Marion ^a   Hosein, Anesa ^a   Lygo Baker, Simon ^a   Medland, Emma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

concept mapping; Feedback literacy; peer review; publication

Indexed keywords

EID: 85074987077     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1686749     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Atjonen, P., 2018. “Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences.” Journal of Academic Ethics 16(4): 359–376. doi:10.1007/s10805-018-9308-3.
2. Balloo, K., C., Evans, A., Hughes, X., Zhu, and N., Winstone. 2018. “Transparency Isn’t Spoon-Feeding: How a Transformative Approach to the Use of Explicit Assessment Criteria Can Support Student Self-Regulation.” Frontiers in Education 3(69): 1–11. doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00069.
3. Bearman, M., and E., Molloy. 2017. “Intellectual Streaking: The Value of Teachers Exposing Minds (and Hearts).” Medical Teacher 39(12): 1284–1285. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1308475.
4. Bozalek, V., M., Zembylas, and T., Shefer. 2019. “Response-Able (Peer) Reviewing Matters in Higher Education: A Manifesto.” In Posthumanism and Higher Education, edited by C., Taylor and A., Bayley. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Braun, V., and V., Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
6. Canagarajah, A. S., 1999. Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Casanave, C. P., 2005. Writing Games: Multicultural Case Studies of Academic Literacy Practices in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
8. Clegg, S., 2009. “Forms of Knowing and Academic Development Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 34(4): 403–416. doi:10.1080/03075070902771937.
9. Carless, D., and D., Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43(8): 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
10. Day, N., and T., Porter. 2017. “Lacerations of the Soul: Rejection-Sensitive Business School Faculty and Perceived Publication Performance.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 25(1): 101–115. doi:10.1177/1548051817709008.
11. Deci, E.L., and R. M., Ryan. 2002. “The Paradox of Achievement: The Harder You Push, the Worse It Gets.” In Improving Academic Achievement, edited by J., Aronson, 61–87. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Dobele, A. R., 2015. “Assessing the Quality of Feedback in the Peer-Review Process.” Higher Education Research & Development 34(5): 853–868. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1011086.
13. Gravett, K., and N., Winstone. 2018. “Feedback Interpreters’: The Role of Learning Development Professionals in Facilitating University Students’ Engagement with Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 24(6): 723–738. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1498076.
14. Green, D. A., and D., Little. 2016. “Family Portrait: A Profile of Educational Developers around the World.” International Journal for Academic Development 21(2): 135–150. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2015.1046875.
15. Hartley, N., and A., Dobele. 2009. “Feathers in the Nest: Establishing a Supportive Environment for Women Researchers.” The Australian Educational Researcher 36(1): 43–58. doi:10.1007/BF03216891.
16. Hattie, J., and H., Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77(1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
17. Holliday, A., 2005. “How Is It Possible to Write?” Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 4(4): 304–309. doi:10.1207/s15327701jlie0404_6.
18. Holliday, A., 2007. Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
19. Horn, S., 2016. “The Social and Psychological Costs of Peer Review: Stress and Coping with Manuscript Rejection.” Journal of Management Inquiry 25(1): 11–26. doi:10.1177/1056492615586597.
20. Hyland, K., 2012. “Welcome to the Machine: Thoughts on Writing for Scholarly Publication.” Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research 01(01): 58–68. doi:10.5420/jsltr.01.01.3319.
21. Impellizzeri, J., D. M., Savinsky, J. A., King, and L., Leitch-Alford. 2017. “Conceptual Mapping Task: An Effective Verification Tool for Qualitative Counseling Research.” Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation 8(1): 31–47. doi:10.1080/21501378.2017.1327745.
22. Jackson, L., M. A., Peters, L., Benade, N., Devine, S., Arndt, D., Forster, A., Gibbons, E., Grierson, P., Jandrić, G., Lazaroiu, et al. 2018. “Is Peer Review in Academic Publishing Still Working?” Open Review of Educational Research 5(1): 95–112. doi:10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139.
23. Kandiko, C. B., and I. M., Kinchin. 2013. “Developing Discourses of Knowledge and Understanding: Longitudinal Studies of PhD Supervision.” London Review of Education 11(1): 46–58. doi:10.1080/14748460.2012.761819.
24. Kinchin, I. M., M., Heron, A., Hosein, S., Lygo-Baker, E., Medland, D., Morley, and N., Winstone. 2018. “Researcher-Led Academic Development.” International Journal for Academic Development 23(4): 339–354. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2018.1520111.
25. Kinchin, I. M., and N. E., Winstone. 2017. Pedagogic Frailty and Resilience in the University. Rotterdam: Sense.
26. Land, R., 2004. Educational Development: Discourse, Identity and Practice. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
27. Lave, J., and E., Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lygo-Baker, S., 2006. “Re-Evaluating Values: The Impact of Academic Developers.” The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review 12(4): 11–18. doi:10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v12i04/46637.
29. Marton, F., and R., Säljö. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning I–Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46(1): 4–11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.
30. Mercer, J., 2013. “Responses to Rejection: The Experiences of Six Women Early Career Researchers in the Education Department of an English University.” Women's Studies International Forum 38(38): 125–134. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.03.008.
31. Molloy, E., and M., Bearman. 2018. “Embracing the Tension between Vulnerability and Credibility: ‘Intellectual Candour’ in Health Professions Education.” Medical Education 53(1): 32–41. doi:10.1111/medu.13649.
32. Paltridge, B., and S., Starfield. 2016. Getting Published in Academic Journals: Navigating the Publication Process. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33. Pitt, E., and L., Norton. 2017. “Now That’s the Feedback I Want!’ Students’ Reactions to Feedback on Graded Work and What They Do with It.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42(4): 499–516. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500.
34. Price, M., K., Handley, and J., Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36(8): 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
35. Reason, P., 1994. Participation in Human Inquiry. London: Sage.
36. Shields, S., 2015. “My Work Is Bleeding: Exploring Students’ Emotional Responses to First-Year Assignment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 20(6): 614–624. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1052786.
37. Smith, R., 2006. “Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99(4): 178–182. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178.
38. Sutton, P., 2012. “Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49(1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
39. Värlander, S., 2008. “The Role of Students’ Emotions in Formal Feedback Situations.” Teaching in Higher Education 13(2): 145–156. 10.1080/13562510801923195
40. Winstone, N., R., Nash, J., Rowntree, and M., Parker. 2017. “It’d Be Useful, but I Wouldn’t Use It’. Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42(11): 2026–2041. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.
41. Winstone, N., R., Nash, M., Parker, and J., Rowntree. 2017. “Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes.” Educational Psychologist 52(1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.
42. Xu, Y., and D., Carless. 2017. “Only True Friends Could Be Cruelly Honest”: Cognitive Scaffolding and Social-Affective Support in Teacher Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42(7): 1082–1094. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759.
43. Zimmerman, B. J., 2008. “Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects.” American Educational Research Journal 45(1): 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909.