Self-, peer- and teacher-assessment of student essays

Active Learning in Higher Education

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 51-62

  Lindblom Ylänne, Sari ^a   Pihlajamäki, Heikki ^a   Kotkas, Toomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

essays; peer assessment; scoring matrix; self assessment; teacher assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990334158     PISSN: 14697874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1469787406061148     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BIGGS, J. (1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
2. BIRENBAUM, M. & DOCHY, F. (1996) Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, LearningProcesses and Prior Knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. BOUD, D. (1992) “The Use of Self-assessment Schedules in Negotiated Learning', Studies in Higher Education 17(2): 185-201.
4. BOUD, D. (1995) Enhancing Learning Through Self-Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
5. BROWN, G., BULL, J. & PENDLEBURY, M. (1997) Assessing Students' Learning in HigherEducation. London: Routledge.
6. BUCHY, M. & QUINLAN, K. (2000) “Adapting the Scoring Matrix: A Case Study of AdaptingDisciplinary Tools for Learning Centred Evaluation', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(1): 81-91.
7. DAVID, T., PATEL, L., BURDETT, K. & RANGACHARI, P. (1999) Problem-based Learning in Medicine. Worcester: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
8. DOCHY, F., SEGERS, M. & SLUIJSMANS, D. (1999) “The Use of Self-, Peer- and Coassessment in Higher Education: A Review', Studies in Higher Education 24(3): 331-351.
9. FALCHIKOV, N. & BOUD, D. (1989) “Student Self-assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-analysis“, Review of Educational Research 59(3): 395-430.
10. GALE, K., MARTIN, K. & MCQUEEN, G. (2002) “Triadic Assessment', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27(6): 557-567.
11. GOLDFINCH, J. (1994) “Further Developments in Peer Assessment of Group Projects”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 19(1): 29-35.
12. GULIKERS, J., BASTIENS, T. & KIRSCHNER, P. (2004) “A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment', Educational Technology Research and Development 52(3): 67-86.
13. HANRAHAN, S. & ISAACS, G. (2001) “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students‘Views’, Higher Education Research & Development 20(1): 53-70.
14. LEJK, M. & WYVILL, M. (2001) “The Effect of the Inclusion of Self-assessment withPeer-assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: A Quantitative Study ofSecret and Agreed Assessments”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26(6): 551-561.
15. LINDBLOM-YLÄNNE, S. & LONKA, K. (2001) “Students' Perceptions of Assessment Practices in aTraditional Medical Curriculum', Advances in Health Sciences Education 6(2): 121-140.
16. MACKENZIE, L. (2000) “Occupational Therapy Students as Peer Assessors in Viva Examinations”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(2): 135-147.
17. MACLELLAN, E. (2004) “How Convincing is Alternative Assessment for Use in Higher Education?' Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29(3): 311-321.
18. MAGIN, D. & HELMORE, P. (2001) “Peer- and Teacher-assessment of Oral Presentation Skills: HowReliable Are They?' Studies in Higher Education 26(3): 287-298.
19. MILLER, P. (2003) “The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-assessment', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28(4): 383-394.
20. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (1996) “The Importance of Marking Criteria in Peer Assessment', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 21(3): 239-249.
21. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (1997) “A Study in Self-assessment: Tutor and Students' Perceptions of Performance Criteria', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 22(4): 357-369.
22. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (2000) “The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self Assessment', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(1): 23-38.
23. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (2002) “The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using StudentDerived Marking Criteria in Peer- and Self-assessment', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27(4): 309-323.
24. POPE, N. (2001) An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in theContext of the Theory of Consumption Values, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26(3): 235-246.
25. RUST, C., PRICE, M. & O'DONOVAN, B. (2003) “Improving Students' Learning by Developing theirUnderstanding of Assessment Criteria and Process”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28(2): 147-164.
26. SAVIN-BADEN, M. (2000) Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: UntoldStories. Buckingham: The Society for Resesarch intoHigher Education & Open University Press.
27. SEGERS, M. & DOCHY, F. (2001) “New Assessment Forms in Problem-based Learning: The Value Addedof the Students' Perspective', Studies in Higher Education 26(3): 327-343.
28. SEGERS, M., DOCHY, F. & CASCALLAR, E. (2003) “The Era of Assessment Engineering:Changing Perspectives on Teaching and Learning and the Role of New Modes ofAssessment', in M. Segers, F. Dochy and E. Cascallar (eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities andStandards, pp. 1-12. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. SEGERS, M., DOCHY, F., VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P. & TEMPELAAR, D. (2001) “The Quality of Co-assessment in a Problem-based Curriculum”. Paper presented at the 9th Conference of European Associationfor Research on Learning and Instruction, 28August–“1 September at Fribourg, Switzerland.
30. SLUIJSMANS, D., BRAND-GRUWEL, S. & MERRIÀNBOER, J. (2002) “Peer Assessment Training in Teacher Education: Effects onPerformance and Perceptions”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27(5): 443-454.
31. TARAS, M. (2001) “The Use of Tutor Feedback and Student Self-assessment inSummative Assessment Tasks: Towards Transparency for Students and for Tutors”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26(5): 605-614.
32. TOPPING, K. (2003) “Self- and Peer-assessment in School andUniversity: Reliability, Validity and Utility', in M. Segers, F. Dochy and E. Cascallar (eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities andStandards, pp. 55-87. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. TOPPING, K., SMITH, E., SWANSON, I. & ELLIOT, A. (2000) “Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing BetweenPostgraduate Students”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(2): 149-169.
34. ZOLLER, U. & BEN-CHAIM, D. (1997) “Student Self-assessment in HOCS Science Examinations: Is itCompatible with that of Teachers?” Paper presented at the 7th EARLI conference, Athens, Greece, 26-30 August.