Metacognition in science education: Defi nitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition

Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education

Volumn 40, Issue , 2012, Pages 21-36

  Veenman, Marcel V J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Declarative Knowledge; Goal Orientation; Metacognitive Knowledge; Science Education; Task Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 85101085967     PISSN: 18780482     EISSN: 18780784     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (98)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 285–310). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
2. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1996). The architecture of cognition. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2007). Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91, 298–320.
5. Anderson, J. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2000). Implications of the ACT-R learning theory: No magic bullets. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1–33). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
6. Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1997). The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 932–945.
7. Armstrong, N. A., Wallace, C. S., & Chang, S.-M. (2008). Learning from writing in college biology. Research in Science Education, 38, 483–499.
8. Azevedo, R. (2007). Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: An introduction. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 57–65.
9. Azevedo, R., Greene, J. A., & Moos, D. C. (2007). The effect of a human agent’s external regulation upon college students’ hypermedia learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 67–87.
10. Bartsch, K., & Estes, D. (1996). Individual differences in children’s developing theory of mind and implications for metacognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 281–304.
11. Berk, L. E. (2003). Child development. Boston: Pearson Education.
12. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
13. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
14. Butler, D. L. (1998). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 277–307). San Diego: Academic.
15. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.
16. Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical review. Child Development, 53, 11–28.
17. Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098–1120.
18. Connor, L. N. (2007). Cueing metacognition to improve researching and essay writing in a final year high school biology class. Research in Science Education, 37, 1–16.
19. De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1984). Strategiegebruik bij het oplossen van problemen in een semantisch rijk domein: electriciteit en magnetisme [Strategy use while solving problems in a semantic rich domain: Electricity and magnetism]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 9, 3–15.
20. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with com puter simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201.
21. Dunlosky, J. (1998). Epilogue. Linking metacognitive theories to education. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 367–381). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
22. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14.
23. Elio, R., & Scharf, P. B. (1990). Modeling novice-to-expert shifts in problem-solving strategy and knowledge organization. Cognitive Science, 14, 579–639.
24. Elshout, J. J. (1987). Probleemoplossen als context voor leren probleemoplossen [Problem solving as context for learning to solve problems]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 42, 344–353.
25. Elshout, J. J. (1996). Architecture of cognition. In E. de Corte & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 369–372). Oxford: Pergamon.
26. Elshout, J. J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hell, J. G. (1993). Using the computer as a help tool during learning by doing. Computers in Education, 21, 115–122.
27. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.
28. Flavell, J. H. (1970). Developmental studies of mediated memory. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 181–211). New York: Academic.
29. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
30. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
31. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-Mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 274–290.
32. Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
33. Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Oveview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv–xxviii). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
34. Glaser, R., Schauble, L., Raghavan, K., & Zeitz, C. (1992). Scientific reasoning across different domains. In E. de Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (NATO ASI series F, Vol. 84, pp. 345–371). Heidelberg: Springer.
35. Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., & Winne, P. H. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 107–124.
36. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113.
37. Israel, S. E., Collins Block, C., Bauserman, K. L., & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (2005). Metacognition in literacy learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
38. Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Metacognition in chemical education: Question posing in the case-based computerized learning environment. Instructional Science, 37, 403–436.
39. Kelemen, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver, C. A., III. (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory and Cognition, 28, 92–107.
40. Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). The inquiry laboratory as a source for the development of metacognitive skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 601–627.
41. Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1–48.
42. Klein, P. D. (2004). Scientific explanation through writing. Instructional Science, 32, 191–231.
43. Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31–64). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
44. Kluwe, R. H., Misiak, C., & Haider, H. (1990). Learning by doing in the control of a complex system. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, S. N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context. Vol. 2.1. Social and cognitive aspects of learning and instruction (pp. 197–218). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
45. Kneser, C., & Ploetzner, R. (2001). Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: Observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning success. Learning and Instruction, 11, 53–83.
46. Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition nad comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85, 758–768.
47. Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205–226.
48. Kuhn, D. (1999). Metacognitive development. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology. A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 259–286). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
49. Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(4), 1–160.
50. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317–345.
51. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2006). Precursors of metamemory in young children: The role of theory of mind and metacognitive vocabulary. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 15–31.
52. Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 141–155.
53. Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 209–237.
54. Mettes, C. T. C. W., Pilot, A., & Roossink, H. J. (1981). Linking factual and procedural knowledge in solving science problems: A case study in a thermodynamics course. Instructional Science, 10, 333–361.
55. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.
56. Nelson, T. O. (1999). Cognition versus metacognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 625–641). Cambridge: MIT Press.
57. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 26 (pp. 125–173). San Diego: Academic.
58. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
59. Pressley, M., & Gaskins, I. (2006). Metacognitive competent reading is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be developed in students? Metacognition and Learning, 1, 99–113.
60. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 866–878.
61. Prins, F. J. (2002). Search & see. The roles of metacognitive skillfulness and intellectual ability during novice inductive learning in a complex computer-simulated environment. (Dissertation, Universiteit van Leiden, Leiden).
62. Reder, L. M., & Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–77). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
63. Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 915–920.
64. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), Toward a general theory of expertise (pp. 172–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Schauble, L., Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1993). The discovery and reflection notation: A graphical trace for supporting self-regulation in computer-based laboratories. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 319–337). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
66. Schellings, G., Aarnoutse, C., & van Leeuwe, J. (2006). Third-grader’s think-aloud protocols: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and Instruction, 16, 549–568.
67. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.
68. Schraw, G., & Nietfeld, J. (1998). A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 236–248.
69. Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., & Roedel, T. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 433–444.
70. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
71. Schunn, C. D., & Anderson, J. R. (1999). The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 337–370.
72. Shute, V. J., & Glaser, R. (1990). A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: Smithtown. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 51–77.
73. Simons, P. R. J. (1996). Metacognition. In E. de Corte & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 436–441). Oxford: Pergamon.
74. Slife, B. D., Weiss, J., & Bell, T. (1985). Separability of metacognition and cognition: Problem solving in learning disabled and regular students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 437–445.
75. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
76. Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311–330.
77. Van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2008). Relation between intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness as predictors of learning performance of young students performing tasks in different domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 128–134.
78. Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75–97). Berlin: Waxmann.
79. Veenman, M. V. J. (2006). Self-questioning as a metacognitive skill. In H. Pedrosa de Jesus & H. van der Meij (Eds.), Research on questioning. Aveiro: University of Aveiro.
80. Veenman, M. V. J. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 177–183.
81. Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 197–218). New York: Routledge.
82. Veenman, M. V. J., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying texts under conditions of text difficulty and time constraint. Learning and Instruction, 14, 619–638.
83. Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.
84. Veenman, M. V. J., & Verheij, J. (2003). Identifying technical students at risk: Relating general versus specific metacognitive skills to study success. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 259–272.
85. Veenman, M. V. J., Samarapungavan, A., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Beishuizen, J. J. (1992). De relatie tussen cognitieve en metacognitieve vaardigheden: een introductie [The relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills: An introduction]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 17, 269–272.
86. Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Busato, V. V. (1994). Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 93–106.
87. Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs. domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7, 187–209.
88. Veenman, M. V. J., Prins, F. J., & Elshout, J. J. (2002). Initial learning in a complex computer simulated environment: The role of metacognitive skills and intellectual ability. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 327–342.
89. Veenman, M. V. J., Prins, F. J., & Verheij, J. (2003). Learning styles: Self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 357–372.
90. Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14, 89–109.
91. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
92. Walczyk, J. J. (1994). The development of verbal efficiency, metacognitive strategies, and their interplay. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 173–189.
93. Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 63–85.
94. Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327–353.
95. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217–221.
96. Zohar, A., & Ben David, A. (2008). Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 59–82.
97. Zohar, A., & Ben David, A. (2009). Paving a clear path in a thick forest: A conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 177–195.
98. Zohar, A., & Peled, B. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low-and high-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 18, 337–353.