Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 141-155

  Manlove, Sarah ^a   Lazonder, Ard W ^a   De Jong, Ton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Inquiry learning; Science teaching; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 36849040991     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-007-9012-y     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1/2), 87-111.
2. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
3. Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
4. Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109-138.
5. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
6. Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819-837.
7. De Jong, T. (2006). Computer simulations: Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312(5773), 532-533.
8. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201.
9. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1-24.
10. Gijlers, A. H., & De Jong, T. (2005a). The relation between prior knowledge and students' collaborative discovery learning processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 264-282.
11. Gijlers, H,. & De Jong, T. (2005b). Confronting ideas in collaborative scientific discovery learning. Paper presented at the AERA 2005, Montreal, CA.
12. Jackson, S. L., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1996). Making dynamic modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 233-257.
13. Kapa, E. (2001). A metacognitive support during the process of problem solving in a computerized environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 317-336.
14. Klahr, D., Dunbar, K., & Fay, A. L. (1990). Designing good experiments to test bad hypotheses. In J. Shrager, & P. Langley (Eds.) Computational models of discovery and theory formation (pp. 355-402). San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufman.
15. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495-523.
16. Lan, W. (2005). Self-monitoring and its relationship with educational level and task importance. Educational Psychology, 25, 109-127.
17. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 61-78.
18. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
19. Lavoie, D. R., & Good, R. (1988). The nature and use of prediction skills in a biological computer-simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 335-360.
20. Lin, X. D., & Lehman, J. D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837-858.
21. Manlove, S., & Lazonder, A. (2004). Self-regulation and collaboration in a discovery learning environment. Paper presented at the First Meeting of the EARLI-SIG on Metacognition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
22. Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2006). Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 87-98.
23. Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
24. Njoo, M., & De Jong, T. (1993). Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instructional support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 821-844.
25. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic.
26. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337-386.
27. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students' transitions from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859-882.
28. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
29. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
30. Swaak, J., Van Joolingen, W. R., & De Jong, T. (1998). Supporting simulation-based learning; the effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge. Learning and Instructions, 8, 235-253.
31. Van der Meij, J., & De Jong, T. (2006). Supporting students' learning with multiple representation in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 199-212.
32. Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 671-688.
33. Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Busato, V. V. (1994). Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 93-106.
34. Von Wright, J. (1992). Reflections on reflection. Learning and Instruction, 2, 59-68.
35. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
36. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Zuniga, S. (2002). Short circuits or superconductors? Effects of group composition on high-achieving students' science performance. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 943-989.
37. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118.
38. White, B. Y., Shimoda, T. A., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: Computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 151-182.
39. Williams, S. M., Bareiss, R., & Reiser, B. J. (1996). Ask Jasper: A multimedia publishing and performance supported environment for design. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, New York, USA.
40. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Zhang, J. W., Chen, Q., Sun, Y. Q., & Reid, D. J. (2004). Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: Experimental research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 269-282.
42. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.)Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-35). San Diego, CA: Academic.