Developing understanding of pupil feedback using Habermas’ notion of communicative action

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 396-414

  Dann, Ruth ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

assessment as learning; communicative action; feedback; learning gap

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940519505     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2015.1056083     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. R.Alexander, (2008). Towards dialogic teaching (4th ed.). London:Dialogos.
2. P.Black, R.McCormick, M.James, & D.Pedder, (2006). Learning how to learn and assessment for learning:A theoretical inquiry. Research Papers in Education, 21, 119–132.10.1080/02671520600615612
3. P.Black, & D.Wiliam, (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
4. P.Black, & D.Wiliam, (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
5. M.Boekaerts, & L.Corno, (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom:A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54, 199–231.10.1111/apps.2005.54.issue-2
6. P.Bourdieu, (1984). Distinction:A social critique of the judgement of taste. London:Routledge.
7. P.Bourdieu, (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, MA:Polity.
8. M.Carr, & G.Claxton, (2002). Tracking the development of learning dispositions. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy and Practice, 9, 9–37.10.1080/09695940220119148
9. G.Claxton, (2008). What’s the point of school? Rediscovering the heart of education. Richmond, VA:Oneworld.
10. R.Dann, (2002). Promoting assessment as learning:Improving the learning process. London:Routledge/Falmer.
11. R.Dann, (2014). Assessment as learning:Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory policy and practice. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy and Practice, 21, 129–166.
12. J.Dewey, (1927). The public and its problems. New York, NY:Shallow Press.
13. C.Dweck, (2012). Mindset:How you can fulfil your potential. London:Robinson.
14. Education Endowment Fund/Sutton Trust, Teaching and Learning Toolkit. (2014). Retrieved August 19, 2014, from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit/about-the-toolkit/
15. T.Englund, (2006). Deliberative communication:A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 503–520.10.1080/00220270600670775
16. H.Fisher, (2011). Inside the primary classroom:Examples of dissatisfaction behind a veil of compliance. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59, 121–141.10.1080/00071005.2011.567969
17. H.Fisher, (2014). ‘It would help if the teacher helps you a bit more … instead of going to the brainiest who don’t need a lot of help’:Exploring the perspectives of dissatisfied girls on the periphery of primary classroom life. British Educational Research Journal, 40, 150–169.10.1002/berj.3034
18. M.Gove, 2013. Speech by Michael Gove on 5th September on the importance of teaching. Retrieved September 18, 2013, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-speaks-about-the-importance-of-teaching
19. A.Gutmann, & D.Thompson, (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
20. A.Gutmann, & D.Thompson, (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Woodstock:Princeton University Press.
21. J.Habermas, (1984). The theory of communicative action:Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA:Polity.
22. J.Habermas, (1987). The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system:The critique of functionalist reasoning (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA:Polity.
23. J.Habermas, (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
24. J.Habermas, (1998). Between facts and norms:Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
25. E.Hargreaves, (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback:Reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39, 229–246.10.1080/03054985.2013.787922
26. J.Hattie, (2009). Visible learning. London:Routledge.
27. J.Hattie, (2012). Visible learning for teachers. London:Routledge.
28. J.Hattie, & H.Timperley, (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
29. A.N.Kluger, & A.DeNisi, (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance:A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
30. A.Lefstein, (2010). More helpful as problem than solution:Some implications of situating dialogue in classrooms. In K.Littleton & C.Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues:Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 170–191). London:Taylor and Francis.
31. H.Leganger-Krogstad, (2014). From dialogue to trialogue:A sociocultural perspective on classroom interaction. Journal for the Study of Religion, 27, 104–128.
32. J.-F.Lyotard, (1994). The postmodern turn. Manchester:Manchester University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570940
33. T.A.McCarthy, (1981). The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
34. P.Moran, & M.Murphy, (2012). Habermas, pupil voice, rationalism, and their meeting with Lacan’s Objet Petit A. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31, 171–181.10.1007/s11217-011-9271-6
35. L.Murtagh, (2014). The motivational paradox of feedback:Teacher and student perceptions. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 516–541. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.944197
36. D.J.Nicol, & D.Macfarlane‐Dick, (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning:A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
37. D.Perkins, (1995). Outsmarting I.Q:The emerging science of learnable intelligence. New York, NY:The Free Press.
38. M.Plum, (2012). Humanism, administration and education:The demand of documentation and the production of a new pedagogical desire. Journal of Education Policy, 27, 491–507.10.1080/02680939.2011.640944
39. J.Pryor, & B.Crossouard, (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34, 1–20.10.1080/03054980701476386
40. P.Ricoeur, (2008). From text to action. London:Continuum.
41. D.R.Sadler, (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.10.1007/BF00117714
42. D.R.Sadler, (1998). Formative assessment:Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 77–84.10.1080/0969595980050104
43. V.Shute, (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
44. L.Steinberg, (1996). Beyond the classroom:Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. NewYork, NY:Touchstone.
45. H.Torrance, (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy and Practice, 14, 281–294.10.1080/09695940701591867
46. H.Torrance, (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads:Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 323–342.10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
47. H.Torrance, & J.Pryor, (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham:Open University Press.
48. P.Tunstall, & C.Gipps, (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment:A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 389–404.10.1080/0141192960220402