Drivers' individual design preferences of takeover requests in highly automated driving

i-com

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 167-178

  Brandenburg, Stefan ^a   Epple, Sandra ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conditional automation; highly automated driving; HMI design; subjective preferences; take over request; take over request modality; take over request procedure

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; LONGITUDINAL CONTROL; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; USER EXPERIENCE; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCES; TAKE-OVER REQUEST; TAKE-OVER REQUEST MODALITY; TAKE-OVER REQUEST PROCEDURE;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85070795654     PISSN: 1618162X     EISSN: 21966826     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/icom-2018-0028     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Albert, M., Lange, A., Schmidt, A., Wimmer, M., & Bengler, K. (2015). Automated driving-assessment of interaction concepts under real driving conditions. Procedia Manufacturing 3, 2832-2839.
2. Bengler, K., Dietmayer, K., Färber, B., Maurer, M., Stiller, C., & Winner, H. (2014). Three decades of driver assistance systems-review and future perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Magazine 6(4), 6-22.
3. Borojeni, S.S., Chuang, L., Heuten, W., & Boll, S. (2016). Assisting drivers with ambient take-over requests in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 237-244). DOI: 10.1145/3003715.3005409.
4. Brandenburg, S. & Chuang, L. (in review). Take-over requests during highly automated driving: How should they be presented and under which conditions Transportation research part F.
5. Brandenburg, S. & Skottke, E.M. (2014). Switching from manual to automated driving and reverse: Are drivers behaving more risky after highly automated driving In IEEE Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), IEEE (pp. 2978-2983). DOI: 10.1109/ITSC.2014.6958168.
6. Casner, S.M., Hutchins, E.L., & Norman, D. (2016). The challenges of partially automated driving. Communications of the ACM 59(5), 70-77. DOI: 10.1145/2830565.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence: Erlbaum.
8. ECE/TRANS/WP.1/145 (2014). Report of the sixty-eight session of the Working Party on Road Traffic Safety, United Nations Economic and Social Council, 1-11.
9. Endsley, M.R. (1995). Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37(1), 32-64.
10. Epple, S., Roche, F., & Brandenburg, S. (2018). The Sooner the Better: Drivers' Reactions to Two-Step Take-Over Requests in Highly Automated Driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 62(1), 1883-1887). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
11. ERTRAC (2015). Automated Driving Roadmap. Technical report of the European Road Transportation Research Advisory Council. Brussels, Belgium.
12. Flemisch, F., Schieben, A., Schoeming, N., Strauss, M., Luecke, S., & Heyden, A. (2011). Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. In Context Diversity, 6767 LNCS (pp. 270-279).
13. Gellatly, A.W., Hansen, C., Highstrom, M., & Weiss, J.P. (2010). Journey: General Motors' move to incorporate contextual design into its next generation of automotive HMI designs. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Vehicular Applications (pp. 156-161).
14. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). "Take over" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 1938-1942. DOI: 10.1177/1541931213571433.
15. Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Carsten, O.M.J., & Lai, F.C.H. (2013). Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 30, 116-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.008.
16. Koo, J., Kwac, J., Ju, W., Steinert, M., Leifer, L., & Nass, C. (2015). Why did my car just do that Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 9(4), 269-275.
17. Kröger, F. (2015). Automated driving in its social, historical, and cultural contexts. In M. Maurer, J.C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner. Autonomous driving: Technical, legal and social aspects (pp. 41-68). SpringerOpen: Berlin, Heidelberg.
18. Louw, T.L., Kountouriotis, G., Carsten, O., & Merat, N. (2015). Driver Inattention During Vehicle Automation: How Does Driver Engagement Affect Resumption Of Control In 4th International Driver Distraction and Inattention Conference (pp. 9-11).
19. Macaranas, A., Antle, A.N., & Riecke, B.E. (2015). What is intuitive Interaction Balancing users' performance and satisfaction with natural user interfaces. Interacting with Computers. DOI: 10.1093/iwc/iwv003.
20. McMillin, B. & Sanford, K.L. (1998). Automated highway systems. IEEE Potentials 17(4), 7-11.
21. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C.H., Daly, M., & Carsten, O.M.J. (2014). Transition to manual: Driver behavior when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation research part F 27, 274-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005.
22. Merat, N. & Lee, J.D. (2012). Preface to the Special Section on Human Factors and Automation in Vehicles: Designing Highly Automated Vehicles With the Driver in Mind. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54(5), 681-686. DOI: 10.1177/0018720812461374.
23. Miller, D., Sun, A., Johns, M., Ive, H., Sirkin, D., Aich, S., & Ju, W. (2015). Distraction becomes engagement in automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting, (pp. 1676-1680).
24. Minge, M., Thüring, M., Wagner, I., & Kuhr, C.V. (2016). The meCUE Questionnaire. A Modular Evaluation Tool for Measuring User Experience. In M. Soares, C. Falcaõ & T.Z. Ahram (Eds.): Advances in Ergonomics Modeling, Usability & Special Populations. Proceedings of the 7th Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Conference 2016. Switzerland: Springer International Press, 115-128.
25. Minge, M., Thüring, M., Wagner, I. (2016). Developing and Validating an English Version of the meCUE Questionnaire for Measuring User Experience. Proceedings of the Human Factors Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601468.
26. Naujoks, F., Mai, C., & Neukum, A. (2014). The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. In T. Ahram, W. Karowowski & T. Marek, Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE, Krakow, Poland.
27. Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., & Neukum, A. (2016). Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation-Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment. Transportation Research Part F, 38, 67-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.011.
28. Petermann-Stock, I., Hackenberg, L., Muhr, T., & Mergl, C. (2013). Wie lange braucht der Fahrer Eine Analyse zu Übernahmezeiten aus verschiedenen Nebentätigkeiten während einer hochautomatisierten Staufahrt. 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme. Der Weg zum automatischen Fahren, 1-26.
29. Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., & de Winter, J. (2017). Takeover again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Applied Ergonomics, 62, 204-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023.
30. Politis, I., Brewster, S., & Pollick, F. (2014). Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4067-4076). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM Press.
31. Politis, I., Brewster, S., & Pollick, F. (2015). Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 3-10). Nottingham: ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/2799250.2799262.
32. Politis, I., Langdon, P., Adebayo, D., Bradley, M., Clarkson, P.J., Skrypchuk, L., Mouzakitis, A., Eriksson, A., Brown, J., Revell, K., & Stanton, N. (2018, March). An evaluation of inclusive dialogue-based interfaces for the takeover of control in autonomous cars. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 601-606). ACM.
33. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., & Bengler, K. (2014). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting, 2063-2067.
34. Stahl, P., Donmez, B., & Jamieson, G.A. (2016). Supporting anticipation in driving through attentional and interpretational in-vehicle displays. Accident Analysis and Prevention 91, 103-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.030.
35. Thüring, M. & Mahlke, S. (2007). Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human-technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 253-264.
36. UK Department of Transportation (2015). The Pathway to Driverless Cars-Summary report and action plan. DfT Publications: London, UK.
37. Walch, M., Lange, K., Baumann, M., & Weber, M. (2015). Autonomous driving: Investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 11-18). ACM.
38. Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., & Young, M.S. (2001). Where is computing driving cars International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 13(2), 203-229.
39. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., & Schrauf, M. (2015). What determines the take-over time An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 78, 212-221.