An evaluation of inclusive dialogue-based interfaces for the takeover of control in autonomous cars

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 601-606

  Politis, Ioannis ^a   Langdon, Patrick ^a   Adebayo, Damilola ^a   Bradley, Mike ^a   Clarkson, P John ^a   Skrypchuk, Lee ^b   Mouzakitis, Alexander ^b   Eriksson, Alexander ^c   Brown, James W H ^d   Revell, Kirsten ^d   Stanton, Neville ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b JAGUAR LAND ROVER   (United Kingdom)

^c SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Autonomous cars; Dialogue system; Evaluation; Inclusive design; Takeover of control

Indexed keywords

SPEECH PROCESSING;

AUTONOMOUS CAR; AUTONOMOUS MODE; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; DRIVING SIMULATOR; EVALUATION; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; SITUATION AWARENESS; TACTILE CUES;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 85045419582     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3172944.3172990     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. V. A. Banks, N. A. Stanton, and C. Harvey. 2014. Subsystems on the road to vehicle automation: Hands and feet free but not "mind" free driving. Safety Science 62:505-514. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.014
2. S. S. Borojeni, L. Chuang, W. Heuten, and S. Boll. 2016. Assisting Drivers with Ambient Take-Over Requests in Highly Automated Driving. In AutomotiveUI 2016, 237-244. http://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005409
3. J. Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194:4-7.
4. Civil Aviation Authority. 2015. Radiotelephony Manual.
5. Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., and C. Lebbon. 2013. Inclusive design: Design for the whole population. Springer.
6. B. Dhillon, R. Kocielnik, I. Politis, M. Swerts, and D. Szostak. 2011. Culture and Facial Expressions: A Case Study with a Speech Interface. In INTERACT 2011, 392-404.
7. M. R. Endsley. 1988. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1988. NAECON 1988., Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National: 789-795. http://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1988.195097
8. M. R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37, 1:32-64. http://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
9. A. Eriksson, S. M. Petermeijer, M. Zimmerman, J. C. F. De Winter, K. J. Bengler, and N. A. Stanton. 2017. Rolling out the red (and green) carpet: supporting driver decision making in automation-to-manual transitions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems: In Press. http://doi.org/10.1002/elan.
10. A. Eriksson and N. A. Stanton. 2017. The chatty codriver: A linguistics approach applying lessons learnt from aviation incidents. Safety Science 99:94-101. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.005
11. Y. Forster, F. Naujoks, and A. Neukum. 2016. Your Turn or My Turn? Design of a Human-Machine Interface for Conditional Automation. In AutomotiveUI 2016, 253-260. http://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005463
12. Y. Forster, F. Naujoks, and A. Neukum. 2017. Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings 2, Iv: 365-372. http://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995746
13. S. G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9:904-908. http://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
14. S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Advances in Psychology 52:139-183. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115 (08) 62386-9
15. A. Hawkins. 2017. Ford and Lyft will work together to deploy autonomous cars. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/27/16373574/fordlyft-self-driving-car-partnership-gm
16. W. J. Horrey and C. D. Wickens. 2004. Driving and Side Task Performance: The Effects of Display Clutter, Separation, and Modality. Human Factors 46, 4:611-624. http://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.4.611.56805
17. SAE J3016. 2016. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles.
18. M. Jeon, I. Politis, S. E. Shaldover, C. Sutter, J. Terken, and B. Poppinga. 2016. Towards Life-Long Mobility: Accessible Transportation with Automation. In AutomotiveUI 2016 EA.
19. M. Karam, F. A. Russo, and D. I. Fels. 2009. Designing the model human cochlea: An ambient crossmodal audio-tactile display. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2, 3:160-169. http://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2009.32
20. S. Keates and P. J. Clarkson. 2002. Countering design exclusion through inclusive design. ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped 44, 73-74:69. http://doi.org/10.1145/960201.957218
21. M. Kyriakidis, R. Happee, and J. C. F. De Winter. 2015. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 32:127-140. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
22. J. D. Van Der Laan, A. Heino, and D. De Waard. 1997. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 5, 1:1-10. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X (96) 00025-3
23. P. Langdon, I. Politis, M. Bradley, L. Skrypchuk, A. Mouzakitis, and P. J. Clarkson. 2017. Obtaining design requirements from the public understanding of driverless technology. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 749-759. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1-72
24. D. R. Large, V. Banks, G. Burnett, and N. Margaritis. 2017. Putting the Joy in Driving?: Investigating the Use of a Joystick as an Alternative to Traditional Controls within Future Autonomous Vehicles. In AutomotiveUI 2017, 31-39.
25. D. R. Large, G. Burnett, B. Anyasodo, and L. Skrypchuk. 2016. Assessing Cognitive Demand during Natural Language Interactions with a Digital Driving Assistant. In AutomotiveUI 2016, 67-74. http://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005408
26. K. J. Lee, Y. K. Joo, and C. Nass. 2014. Partially Intelligent Automobiles and Driving Experience at the Moment of System Transition. In CHI 2014, 3631-3634.
27. R. McCall, F. McGee, A. Meschtscherjakov, N. Louveton, and T. Engel. 2016. Towards A Taxonomy of Autonomous Vehicle Handover Situations. In AutomotiveUI 2016, 193-200. http://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005456
28. Microsoft. 2012. Microsoft Speech Platform. Retrieved from http://msdn. microsoft.com/enus/library/hh361572.aspx
29. F. Naujoks, D. Befelein, K. Wiedemann, and A. Neukum. 2017. A Review of Non-driving-related Tasks Used in Studies on Automated Driving. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 525-537. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1
30. F. Naujoks, Y. Forster, K. Wiedemann, and A. Neukum. Speech improves human-automation cooperation in automated driving. Mensch und Computer 2016 - Workshopband. http://doi.org/10.18420/muc2016-ws08-0007
31. F. Naujoks, C. Mai, and A. Neukum. 2014. The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, 431-438.
32. Phys.org. 2017. GM unit says it has "mass producible" autonomous cars. Phys.org. Retrieved from https://phys.org/news/2017-09-gm-mass-autonomouscars.html
33. I. Politis, S. Brewster, and F. Pollick. 2015. Language-Based Multimodal Displays for the Handover of Control in Autonomous Cars. In Automotive UI 2015, 3-10.
34. I. Politis, S. Brewster, and F. Pollick. 2017. Using Multimodal Displays to Signify Critical Handovers of Control to Distracted Autonomous Car Drivers. International Journal of Mobile Human-Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) 9, 3:1-16.
35. I. Politis, P. Langdon, M. Bradley, L. Skrypchuk, A. Mouzakitis, and P. J. Clarkson. 2017. Designing autonomy in cars: A survey and two focus groups on driving habits of an inclusive user group, and group attitudes towards autonomous cars. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 161-173. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60597-5-15
36. C. Rödel, S. Stadler, A. Meschtscherjakov, and M. Tscheligi. 2014. Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience. Automotive UI 2014:1-8. Retrieved December 16, 2014 from http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=2667330
37. B. Schoettle and M. Sivak. 2014. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia.
38. B. Schoettle and M. Sivak. 2014. Public Opinion About Self-Driving Vehicles in China, India, Japan, The U. S., The U. K. and Australia. http://doi.org/UMTRI-2014-30
39. B. Schoettle and M. Sivak. 2015. Motorists' Preferencesfor Different Levels of Vehicle Automation.
40. B. Schoettle and M. Sivak. 2016. Motorists' Preferences for Different Levels of Vehicle Automation: 2016.
41. R. M. Taylor. 1989. Situational Awareness Rating Techniqu (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478 pp. 3/1-3/17).
42. T. Van Veen and J. Terken. 2017. Situation Awareness in Automated Vehicles through Proximal Peripheral Light Signals. In AutomotiveUI 2017, 287-292.
43. Volvo. Autopilot - Self-driving Volvos by 2017. Retrieved from https://www.volvocars.com/au/about/innovations/intelli safe/autopilot
44. M. Walch, K. Lange, M. Baumann, and M. Weber. 2015. Autonomous Driving: Investigating the Feasibility of Car-Driver Handover Assistance. In AutomotiveUI'15, 11-18. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799268
45. M. Walch, T. Sieber, P. Hock, M. Baumann, and M. Weber. 2016. Towards Cooperative Driving: Involving the Driver in an Autonomous Vehicle's Decision Making. In AutomotiveUI 2016, 261-268. http://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005458
46. C. D. Wickens. 1980. The structure of attentional resources.
47. C. D. Wickens. 2008. Multiple Resources and Mental Workload. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50, 3:449-455. http://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394