The sooner the better: Drivers' reactions to two-step take-over requests in highly automated driving

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 3, Issue , 2018, Pages 1883-1887

  Epple, Sandra ^a   Roche, Fabienne ^a   Brandenburg, Stefan ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; ERGONOMICS; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; DRIVING BEHAVIOR; DRIVING SITUATIONS; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; MULTI-STEP; SITUATIONAL AWARENESS; VEHICLE CONTROL;

HUMAN REACTION TIME;

EID: 85069267032     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Casner, S. M., Hutchins, E. L., & Norman, D. (2016). The challenges of partially automated driving. Communications of the ACM, 59(5), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.l 145/2830565
2. Damböck, D., Bengler, K., Farid, M., & Tönert, L. (2012). Übemahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Fahren. Tagung Fahrerassistenz. München, 15, 16.
3. Endsley, M. R. (1996). Automation and situation awareness. Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, 20, 163-181.
4. Eriksson, A., & Stanton, N. A. (2017). Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(4), 689-705. https://doi.org/10.l 177/0018720816685832
5. Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., & Huestegge, L (2017). Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 109, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap. 2017.09.019
6. Gasser, T. M., Arzt, C., Ayoubi, M., Battels, A., Burkle, L., Eier, J.. Vogt, W. (2012). Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung: gemeinsamer Schlussbericht der Projektgruppe. (Bundesanstalt für Stra- ßenwesen, Ed.). Bremerhaven: Wirtschaftsverlag NW.
7. Merat, N., Jamson, A. H., Laii, F. C. H., Daly, M., & Carsten, O. M. J. (2014). Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005
8. Naujoks, F., Mai, C, & Neukum, A (2014). The effect of urgency of takeover requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Part I. Krakow.
9. Petermann-Stock, I., Hackenberg, L., Muhr, T., & Mergl, C. (2013). Wie lange braucht der Fahrer? Eine Analyse zu Übemahmezeiten aus verschiedenen Nebentätigkeiten während einer hochautomatisierten Staufahrt. Presented at the 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme. der Weg zum automatischen Fahren.
10. Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., & De Winter, J. (2017). Takeover again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Applied Ergonomics, 62, 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023
11. Politis, I., Brewster, S., & Pollick, F. (2014). Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency. In Proceedings of the SIGCHl Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4067-4076). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556988
12. Politis, I., Brewster, S., & Pollick, F. (2015). Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 3-10). Nottingham: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799262
13. Walch, M., Lange, K., Baumann, M., & Weber, M. (2015). Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 11-18). Nottingham: ACM Press, https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799268