Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 4067-4076

  Politis, Ioannis ^a   Brewster, Stephen ^a   Pollick, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audio; Lateral Deviation; Multimodal Interaction; Response Time; Simulator; Situational Urgency; Steering Angle; Tactile; Visual; Warnings

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; ERGONOMICS; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS); SIMULATORS;

AUDIO; LATERAL DEVIATION; MULTI-MODAL INTERACTIONS; SITUATIONAL URGENCY; STEERING ANGLES; TACTILE; VISUAL; WARNINGS;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 84900425779     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2556288.2556988     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Ablaßmeier, M., Poitschke, T., Wallhoff, F., Bengler, K., and Rigoll, G. Eye gaze studies comparing head-up and head-down displays in vehicles. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, IEEE (2007), 2250-2252
2. Baldwin, C. L., Eisert, J. L., and Garcia, A. Multimodal urgency coding: Auditory, visual, and tactile parameters and their impact on perceived urgency. Work 41, (2012), 3586-3591
3. Baldwin, C. L. Verbal collision avoidance messages during simulated driving: Perceived urgency, alerting effectiveness and annoyance. Ergonomics 54, 4 (2011), 328-337
4. Bliss, J. P. and Acton, S. A. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: How collision alarm reliability affects driving. Applied ergonomics 34, 6 (2003), 499-509
5. Brewster, S. A., Wright, P. C., and Edwards, A. D. N. An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory human-computer interfaces. Proceedings INTER CHI'93, ACM Press (1993), 222-227
6. Brumby, D. P., Davies, S. C. E., Janssen, C. P., and Grace, J. J. Fast or Safe ? How Performance Objectives Determine Modality Output Choices While Interacting on the Move. CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 473-482
7. Cao, Y., van der Sluis, F., Theune, M., op den Akker, R., and Nijholt, A. Evaluating informative auditory and tactile cues for in-vehicle information systems. AutomotiveUI '10, AutomotiveUI (2010), 102-109
8. Edworthy, J., Hellier, E., Walters, K., Weedon, B., and Adams, A. The Relationship between Task Performance, Reaction Time, and Perceived Urgency in Nonverbal Auditory Warnings. HFES Annual Meeting 44, 22 (2000), 674-677
9. Edworthy, J., Loxley, S., and Dennis, I. Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human Factors 33, 2 (1991), 205-231
10. Gonzalez, C., Lewis, B. A., Roberts, D. M., Pratt, S. M., and Baldwin, C. L. Perceived Urgency and Annoyance of Auditory Alerts in a Driving Context. HFES Annual Meeting 56, 1 (2012), 1684-1687
11. Ho, C., Reed, N., and Spence, C. Multisensory In-Car Warning Signals for Collision Avoidance. Human Factors 49, 6 (2007), 1107-1114
12. Ho, C. and Spence, C. Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. Journal of experimental psychology. Applied 11, 3 (2005), 157-74
13. Ho, C. and Spence, C. Multisensory Driver. Ashgate, 2008
14. Ho, C., Tan, H. Z., and Spence, C. Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8, 6 (2005), 397-412
15. Hoggan, E., Raisamo, R., and Brewster, S. A. Mapping information to audio and tactile icons. ICMI-MLMI '09, (2009), 327-334
16. Hoggan, E. E. and Brewster, S. A. Crossmodal icons for information display. CHI EA '06, ACM Press (2006), 857-862
17. Horrey, W. J. and Wickens, C. D. Driving and Side Task Performance: The Effects of Display Clutter, Separation, and Modality. Human Factors 46, 4 (2004), 611-624
18. Kaufmann, C., Ohg, F., Risser, R., Geven, A., and Sefelin, R. Effects of simultaneous multi-modal warnings and traffic information on driver behaviour. Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, (2008), 33-42
19. Lewis, B. A. and Baldwin, C. L. Equating Perceived Urgency Across Auditory, Visual, and Tactile Signals. HFES Annual Meeting 56, 1 (2012), 1307-1311
20. Lewis, B. A., Penaranda, B. N., Roberts, D. M., and Baldwin, C. L. Effectiveness of Bimodal Versus Unimodal Alerts for Distracted Drivers. Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, (2013), 376-382
21. Lindgren, A., Angelelli, A., Mendoza, P. A., and Chen, F. Driver behaviour when using an integrated advisory warning display for advanced driver assistance systems. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 3, 4 (2009), 390-399
22. Liu, Y.-C. and Jhuang, J.-W. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance. Applied ergonomics 43, 4 (2012), 679-86
23. Liu, Y. C. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems. Ergonomics 44, 4 (2001), 425-42
24. Marshall, D. C., Lee, J. D., and Austria, P. A. Alerts for In-Vehicle Information Systems: Annoyance, Urgency, and Appropriateness. Human Factors 49, 1 (2007), 145-157
25. Murata, A., Kanbayashi, M., and Hayami, T. Effectiveness of automotive warning system presented with multiple sensory modalities. SICE Annual Conference, IEEE Comput. Soc (2012), 920-925
26. Oskarsson, P. A., Eriksson, L., and Carlander, O. Enhanced Perception and Performance by Multimodal Threat Cueing in Simulated Combat Vehicle. Human Factors 54, 1 (2011), 122-137
27. Politis, I., Brewster, S., and Pollick, F. Evaluating Multimodal Driver Displays of Varying Urgency. Automotive UI 2013, ACM Press (2013)
28. Pratt, S. M., Lewis, B. A., Penaranda, B. N., Roberts, D. M., Gonzalez, C., and Baldwin, C. L. Perceived Urgency Scaling in Tactile Alerts. HFES Annual Meeting 56, 1 (2012), 1303-1306
29. Raab, D. H. Statistical Facilitation of Simple Reaction Times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences 24, 5 Series II (1962), 574-590
30. Salvucci, D. D. Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human factors 48, 2 (2006), 362-380
31. Scott, J. J. and Gray, R. A Comparison of Tactile, Visual, and Auditory Warnings for Rear-End Collision Prevention in Simulated Driving. Human Factors 50, 2 (2008), 264-275
32. Serrano, J., Di Stasi, L. L., Megías, A., and Catena, A. Effect of directional speech warnings on road hazard detection. Traffic injury prevention 12, 6 (2011), 630-635.