Rigor and responsiveness in classroom activity

Teachers College Record

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Thompson, Jesica ^a   Hagenah, Sara ^b   Kang, Hosun ^c   Stroupe, David ^d   Braaten, Melisa ^e   Colley, Carolyn ^a   Windschitl, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068430280     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alozie, N. M., Moje, E. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395-427.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Banilower, E., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2006). The status of K-12 science teaching in the United States: Results from a national observation survey. In D. Sunal & E. Wright (Eds.), The impact of the state and national standards on K-12 science teaching (pp. 83-122). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
4. Banks, J. A. (1997). Educating citizens in a multicultural society. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
5. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50-73.
6. Bergeron, B. S. (2008). Engaging a culturally responsive curriculum in a novice teacher's classroom: Encountering disequilibrium. Urban Education, 43(4), 4-28.
7. Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 3-12.
8. Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1039-1065.
9. Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608-645.
10. Brown, A. L., & Kane. M. J. (1988). Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from examples. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 493-523.
11. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirschner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 151-233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109-1136.
14. Cohen, D. (2011). Teaching: Practice and its predicaments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Croninger, R., Buese, D., & Larson, J. (2012). A mixed-methods look at teaching quality: Challenges and possibilities from one study. Teachers College Record, 114, 1-3.
17. Dreier, O. (2003). Learning in personal trajectories of participation. In N. Stephenson, H. Radtke, R. Jorna, & H. Stam (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Critical contributions (pp. 20-29). Concord, Canada: Captus University Publications.
18. Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268-291.
19. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London, England: Routledge.
20. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
21. Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247-284.
22. Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 207-245.
23. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, & practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
24. Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
25. Gutiérrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 444-471.
26. Gutiérrez, K., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 100-117.
27. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice, 2nd edition. London, England: Routledge.
28. Harris, C. J., Phillips, R. S., & Penuel W. R. (2012). Examining teachers' instructional moves aimed at developing students' ideas and questions in learner-centered science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 23(7), 769-788.
29. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 433-475.
30. Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3-4), 451-493.
31. Horizon Research International (HRI). (2003). Special tabulations of the 2000-2001 LSC teacher questionnaire and classroom observation data. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
32. Horn, I. S., & Kane, B. D. (April, 2012). Tracing the development of pedagogical reasoning in mathematics teachers' collaborative conversations. Paper presented at the annual American Educational Research Association conference, Vancouver, Canada.
33. Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in conducting whole-class discussions in middle-grade mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646-682.
34. Kang, H., Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2014). Designing learning opportunities that advance scientific thinking with intellectually challenging instructional tasks. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35. Kelly, G., & Bazerman, C. (2003). How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 28-55.
36. Kennedy, M. M. (1999). The role of pre-service teacher education. In L. Darling Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 54-86). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37. Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94, 810-824.
38. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 59-65.
39. Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21-35.
40. Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2014). Better than "best practice": Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. New York, NY: Routledge.
41. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23, 512-529.
42. Leinhardt, G., & Steele, M. (2005). Seeing the complexity to standing to the side: Instructional dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 87-163.
43. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44. Levin, D., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154.
45. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.
46. Menchaca, V. D. (2001). Providing a culturally relevant curriculum for Hispanic children. Multicultural Education, 8(3), 18-20.
47. Mercer, N. (1995). The Guided Construction of Knowledge: talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
48. Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33-59.
49. Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (2012). Talk science primer. Cambridge, MA. TERC.
50. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283-297.
51. Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38-71.
52. Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). "Maestro, what is 'quality'?": Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469-498.
53. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
54. Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
55. O'Connor, M. C., & Garnier, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussions. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56. O'Connor, C., & Michaels, S. (2007). When is dialogue "dialogic"? Human Development, 50, 275-285.
57. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
58. Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of first-hand and text-based investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 151-193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97.
60. Pierson, J. (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 2008.
61. Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39(3), 183-197.
62. Rosebery, A., & Warren, B. (1995). Equity in the future tense: Redefining relationships among teachers, students and science in linguistic minority classrooms. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 298-328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
63. Rosebery, A., & Warren, B. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students' strengths. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
64. Roth, K., & Garnier, H. (2007). What science teaching looks like: An international perspective. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 16-23.
65. Sandoval, W. A. (2009). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5-51.
66. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20-37.
67. Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. (2000). Sixth grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349-422.
68. Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., O'Connor, M. C., & Resnick, L. B. (2009). Guided construction of knowledge in the classroom: The Troika of well-structured talk, tasks, and tools. In B. Schwarz & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Advances in Learning and Instruction (pp. 105-129). London, England: Elsevier.
69. Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98, 487-516.
70. Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464-476.
71. Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 574-615.
72. Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple school science investigations: Can pre-service instruction foster teachers' understandings of model-based inquiry? American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783-835.
73. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). The beginner's repertoire: Proposing a core set of instructional practices for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878-903.