Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 87-163

  Leinhardt, Gaea ^a   Steele, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13944259024     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_4     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anderson, J. L., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
2. Anderson, J. L., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 18-21.
3. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
4. Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500-508.
5. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171-200). Stamford, CT: Elsevier Science.
6. Bromme, R. (1982, March). How to analyze routines in teachers' thinking processes during lesson planning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
7. Bromme, R., & Brophy, J. E. (1986). Teachers cognitive activities. In B. Christiansen, G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 99-139). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
9. Chazan, D., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 187-199.
10. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning: Perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4-15.
12. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2001). The mathematical education of teachers. In Issues in mathematics education (Vol. 11). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society in cooperation with Mathematical Association of America.
13. Coxford, A. F., Fey, J. T., Hirsch, C. R., Schoen, H. L., Burrill, G., Hart, E. W., et al. (with Messenger, M. J., & Ritsema, B.). (1997). Contemporary mathematics in context: A unified approach (Course 1). Columbus, OH: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
14. Descartes, R. (1952). Geometry. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1637)
15. Eisenhart, M., Borko, H., Underhill, R., Brown, C., Jones, D., & Agard, P. (1993). Conceptual knowledge falls through the cracks: Complexities of learning to teach mathematics for understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 8-40.
16. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
17. Good, T., Grouws, D., & Ebmeier, H. (1983). Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
18. Greeno, J. G. (1988). The situated activities of learning and knowing mathematics. In M. J. Behr, C. B. Lacampagen, & M. M. Wheeler (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 481-521). DeKalb, IL: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America.
19. Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 94-99.
20. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 5-17.
21. Greeno, J. G., & The Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group. (1997). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
22. Grice, P. (1998). Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.
24. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
25. Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The schools we need and why we don't have them. New York: Doubleday.
26. Hull, G., & Greeno, J. G. (2002, May). Identity and agency in school and non-school worlds. Paper presented at the After-School Corporation conference, New York.
27. Knuth, E. J. (2000). Student understanding of the Cartesian connection: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 500-508.
28. Lampert, M. (1989). Choosing and using mathematical tools in classroom discourse. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 223-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-64.
30. Lampert, M. (1992). Teaching and learning long division for understanding in school. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 221-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Lampert, M. (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Lawler, R. (1979). One child's learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
35. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1999). Respect: An exploration. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
36. Lehrer, R., & Lesh, R. (2003). Mathematical learning. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 357-391). New York: Wiley.
37. Leinhardt, G. (1983). Novice and expert knowledge of individual student's achievement. Educational Psychologist, 18, 165-179.
38. Leinhardt, G. (1987). Development of an expert explanation: An analysis of a sequence of subtraction lessons. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 225-282.
39. Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 52-75.
40. Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 333-357). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
41. Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-95.
42. Leinhardt, G., & Ohlsson, S. (1990). Tutorials on the structure of tutoring from teachers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2, 21-46.
43. Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K. M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 135-176.
44. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
45. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
46. Minstrell, J. (1999, June). The role of the teacher in making sense of classroom experiences, and effecting better learning. Paper presented at the 30th Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
47. Morine-Dershimer, G. (1985). Talking, listening, and learning in elementary classrooms. In Institute for Research on Teaching Monograph Series (Vol. X). New York: Longman.
48. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1997). Middle childhood and early adolescence/mathematics: Standards for National Board certification. Washington, DC: Author.
49. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
50. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
51. Norman, A. (1992). Teachers' mathematical knowledge of the concept of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 215-232). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
52. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Pitts, V. R. (2003). Representations of functions: An examination of pre-service mathematics teachers' knowledge of translations between algebraic and graphical representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
54. Romberg, T. A., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. P. (Eds.). (1993). Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
55. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4, 1-94.
56. Schoenfeld, A. H. (in press). Dilemmas/decisions: Can we model the on-line decision-making of teachers? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
57. Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol 4, pp. 55-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
58. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
59. Sherin, M. G. (2002a). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 205-233.
60. Sherin, M. G. (2002b). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 119-150.
61. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
62. Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (1996). Building discourse communities in mathematics classrooms: A worthwhile but challenging journey. In P. C. Elliott (Ed.), 1996 yearbook: Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond (pp. 20-28). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
63. Smith, J. P. (1990). Learning rational number. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
64. Smith, J. P. (1995). Competent reasoning with rational numbers. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 3-50.
65. Smith, M. S. (2000). Balancing old and new: An experienced middle school teacher's learning in the context of mathematics instructional reform. Elementary School Journal, 100, 351-375.
66. Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
67. Stein, M. K., Baxter, J. A., & Leinhardt, G. (1990). Subject-matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 639-663.
68. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Hughes, E. K., & Smith, M. S. (2004). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Helping teachers learn to better incorporate student thinking. Manuscript submitted for publication.
69. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
70. Wehmiller, P. L. (1988). A gathering of gifts. (Available from the Friends Council on Education, 1507 Cherry Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102)
71. Willoughby, S. S., Bereiter, C., Hilton, P., & Rubenstein, J. H. (1981). Real math (Level 5). La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Co.
72. Wood, T., Cobb, P. & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 587-616.
73. Yinger, R. J. (1979). Routines in teacher planning. Theory into Practice, 18, 163-169.
74. Yinger, R. J. (1980). A study of teacher planning. The Elementary School Journal, 80, 107-127.
75. Yinger, R. J. (1987). Learning the language of practice. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 293-318.