Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 85, Issue , 2019, Pages 175-189

  van der Kleij, Fabienne M ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Feedback; Formative assessment; Individual student characteristics; Perception; Student; Teacher

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068386390     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adie, L.E., Klenowski, V., Wyatt-Smith, C., Towards an understanding of teacher judgement in the context of social moderation. Educational Review 64 (2012), 223–240, 10.1080/00131911.2011.598919.
2. Adie, L., Van der Kleij, F.M., Cumming, J., The development and application of coding frameworks to explore dialogic feedback interactions and self-regulated learning. British Educational Research Journal 44 (2018), 704–723, 10.1002/berj.3463.
3. Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2016), 252–265, 10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863.
4. Attali, Y., Effects of multiple-try feedback and question type during mathematics problem solving on performance in similar problems. Computers & Education 86 (2015), 260–267, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.011.
5. Attali, Y., Van der Kleij, F.M., Effects of feedback elaboration and feedback timing during computer-based practice in mathematics problem solving. Computers & Education 110 (2017), 154–169, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.012.
6. Australian Education Regulation, Australian Government, Federal register of legislation. 2013 https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2016C00958.
7. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, National professional standards for teachers. 2011 Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/aitsl_national_professional_standards_for_teachers.
8. Black, P., Wiliam, D., Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (2009), 5–31, 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
9. Butler, D.L., Winne, P.H., Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65 (1995), 245–281, 10.3102/00346543065003245.
10. Carless, D., Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education 31 (2006), 219–233, 10.1080/03075070600572132.
11. th ed., 2012, Pearson, Boston.
12. rd ed., 2013, SAGE, Washington.
13. Dann, R., Developing the foundations for dialogic feedback in order to better understand the “learning gap” from a pupil's perspective. London Review of Education 13:3 (2015), 5–20.
14. Gamlem, S.M., Smith, K., Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20 (2013), 150–169, 10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212.
15. Handley, K., Price, M., Millar, J., Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education 37 (2011), 543–560, 10.1080/03054985.2011.604951.
16. Hargreaves, E., Teachers' classroom feedback: Still trying to get it right. Pedagogies: International Journal 7 (2012), 1–15, 10.1080/1554480X.2012.630454.
17. Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., Klieme, E., The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback's perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology 34 (2014), 269–290, 10.1080/01443410.2013.785384.
18. Harris, L.R., Brown, G.T.L., Harnett, J.A., Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 26 (2014), 107–133, 10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5.
19. Hattie, J., Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. 2009, Routledge, London.
20. Hattie, J., Gan, M., Instruction based on feedback. Alexander, P., Mayer, R.E., (eds.) Handbook of research on learning and instruction, 2011, Routledge, New York, 249–271.
21. Hattie, J., Timperley, H., The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 (2007), 81–112, 10.3102/003465430298487.
22. Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., Ludvigsen, K., Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies In Educational Evaluation 38 (2012), 21–27, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001.
23. Jónsson, Í.R., Smith, K., Geirsdóttir, G., Shared language of feedback and assessment. Perception of teachers and students in three Icelandic secondary schools. Studies In Educational Evaluation 56 (2018), 52–58, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.003.
24. Kluger, A.N., DeNisi, A., The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119 (1996), 254–284, 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
25. Lipnevich, A.A., Berg, D.A.G., Smith, J.K., Toward a model of student response to feedback. Brown, G.T.L., Harris, L.R., (eds.) The handbook of human and social conditions in assessment, 2016, Routledge, New York, 169–185.
26. Lipnevich, A.A., Smith, J.K., Effects of differential feedback on students' examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 (2009), 319–333, 10.1037/a0017841.
27. Marshall, B., Goals or horizons — the conundrum of progression in English: Or a possible way of understanding formative assessment in English. Curriculum Journal 15 (2004), 101–113, 10.1080/0958517042000226784.
28. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs, Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. 2008 Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf.
29. Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., et al. Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education 71 (2014), 56–76, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011.
30. Nicol, D., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31 (2006), 199–218, 10.1080/03075070600572090.
31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Education policy outlook 2015: Making reforms happen. 2015, Author, Paris Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-policy-outlook-2015_9789264225442-en.
32. Peterson, E.R., Irving, S.E., Secondary school students' conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction 18 (2008), 238–250, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001.
33. Pintrich, P.R., De Groot, E.V., Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82:1 (1990), 33–40.
34. Popham, W.J., Transformative assessment. 2008, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
35. QSR International, NVivo (version 11) [computer software]. 2015.
36. Rowe, A.D., Wood, L.N., Student perceptions and preferences for feedback. Asian Social Science 4 (2008), 78–88, 10.5539/ass.v4n3p78.
37. Schreier, M., Qualitative content analysis. Flick, U., (eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 2014, SAGE, London, 170–183.
38. Shute, V.J., Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78 (2008), 153–189, 10.3102/0034654307313795.
39. Small, M., Lin, A., Instructional feedback in mathematics. Lipnevich, A.A., Smith, J.K., (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback, 2018, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 169–190.
40. Stiggins, R., The emotional dynamics of feedback from the student's point of view. Lipnevich, A.A., Smith, J.K., (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback, 2018, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 519–530.
41. nd ed., 2010, SAGE, London.
42. Taylor, R.T., Review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) using reliability generalization techniques to assess scale reliability (Order No. 3520489)., 2012 Available from: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1033786065). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1033786065?accountid=8194.
43. Van der Kleij, F.M., Adie, L.E., Cumming, J.J., Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology 48 (2017), 1092–1105, 10.1111/bjet.12536.
44. Voerman, L., Korthagen, F.A.J., Meijer, P.C., Simons, R.J., Feedback revisited: Adding perspectives based on positive psychology. Implications for theory and classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education 43 (2014), 91–98, 10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.005.
45. Williams, J.A., ‘You know what you've done right and what you've done wrong and what you need to improve on’: New Zealand students' perspectives on feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (2010), 301–314, 10.1080/0969594X.2010.496249.
46. Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Parker, M., Rowntree, J., Supporting learners' agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist 52 (2017), 17–37, 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.
47. Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., Mewborn, C., Toward a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback: A mixed methods study. Reading and Writing 29 (2016), 349–370, 10.1007/s11145-015-9599-3.